ok i have a 1dmk11n about a month old, i shot tonight at 1600iso and noticed banding in one of the jpegs but not its corresponding(sp) raw file. my question is to the others experiencing banding, is it only in your jpegs?
nycgrip Member 88 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: NYC, NY More info | Jan 16, 2007 17:48 | #1 ok i have a 1dmk11n about a month old, i shot tonight at 1600iso and noticed banding in one of the jpegs but not its corresponding(sp) raw file. my question is to the others experiencing banding, is it only in your jpegs?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Jan 16, 2007 17:49 | #2 was the jpeg processed in CS auto settings? Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
i have auto settings off in cs, and tried it in microsoft picture viewer which i figure is a basic prog that wont manipulate photo and still saw the banding. banding wasnt in other similarily framed photos taken within seconds
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lord_Malone Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book 7,686 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Jan 16, 2007 20:33 | #4 Post some sample pics. ~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
if you push the exposure 4-5 stops youll see banding more clearly.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lord_Malone Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book 7,686 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Jan 16, 2007 22:09 | #6 It's there, but very difficult to see if you're not looking for it. Doesn't seem serious. And it can easily be fixed in PP. You said this only happened in this one shot right? ~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
in a bunch, those two shots were more prominant, pretty much anything shot at iso 1600 with lots of sky. 800 iso was fine.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thekid24 pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Jan 16, 2007 22:35 | #8 I dont have a 2N (yet) but have heard of this problem. Not only in the 1D models but also with other cameras. (5D 30D 20D) and as of last night I saw it in my XT in RAW but only when exposure was extremely high, the difference was my ISO was at 100. This isnt the first time this has happened. Im thinking its with low light and overexposed shots. At least that is what has happened to me, but I could be wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tag141 Goldmember 3,247 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Trans Trans Tasman? More info | Jan 17, 2007 00:32 | #9 [Story] There is a woman in work who has the most disgusting eating habits. She 'troughs', talks with her mouth full, chews with her mouth open and generally upsets everyone with the way she eats. However, I sat in the staff room blissfully unaware of this behaviour until someone pointed it out.[/story]
This is the original image, just the jpeg extracted...
So just to check, I went back with my 10D with 24-70L @ 1600ISO attached and retook the image. I underexposed, overexposed with the camera and also in CS2, as well as increasing brightness etc.
Noisy, yes...banding...no. The N is now back at Canon to check. I really think paying $$$ for a camera and having to remedy images in CS2 isn't on. In my job, QC and calibrations are vital and I wouldn't run my equipment without performing these daily. When I put my order in for the N, there was a six week back order and I wonder if Canon put through a rush batch to play catch up. There are too many people on this forum who have noiseless, bandingless images for me to ignore this problem on my camera. Plus this isn't the only image it appears on, just the easiest to see. I really hope Canon find and fix the problem as I love this camera and I'm sure that the banding issue is very isolated. Also see this thread...https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=260160
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tag please if you remember let me know the outcome. i can live with it for now, but if they can fix it i would have to take it in. im not so sure that all 'ns dont have this problem when exposed improperly in high isos.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FatPete Senior Member 287 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Blackpool, UK More info | I've noticed the same on mine from ISO 800 upwards. Now I didn't notice it before the last firmware upgrade, but this could be (and probably is) coincidence!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tag141 Goldmember 3,247 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Trans Trans Tasman? More info | Jan 17, 2007 01:59 | #12 Actually FatPete, these images were before I updated to the last firmware. I didn't think to try it after updating. I suspect however, the issue will remain.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
had an idea, so i checked the operating temperatures of the mk11n and they are 32-104f. and it was below that when pictures taken. possible factor?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lord_Malone Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book 7,686 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Jan 17, 2007 05:03 | #14 The 1Dinosaur is known for banding at ISO above 1600. I've seen this, but it's really not that big of a deal for me. I don't expect it to be as prominent in the later incarnations of the 1D though. But if it does exists then so be it. I can live with the occaisional banding. ~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FatPete Senior Member 287 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Blackpool, UK More info | Jan 17, 2007 06:58 | #15 I'll post up a shot tonight at 1600 when I get home - may also get in touch with Canon to see what they say, although it will really cripple my 'photo-per-day' project if I have to send it away for a few weeks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1692 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||