Another vote for the Sigma 17-70 Dc macro, Nothing can touch it for the price!
Janika Goldmember 1,060 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Ontario, CA More info | Jan 17, 2007 17:19 | #16 Another vote for the Sigma 17-70 Dc macro, Nothing can touch it for the price! (John) CANON A590 iS - EOS 50D - EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM - EF 50 f/1.8 II - Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 XR Di II - Velbon Sherpa pro - SIGMA DG500-ST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember 1,845 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info |
Citizen_Insane Senior Member 453 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ames, IA More info | Jan 17, 2007 20:44 | #18 |
wallydog Member 37 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Another nod for the Sigma 17-70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JaysonPrentice Senior Member 365 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Lenexa, KS More info | Jan 18, 2007 00:38 | #20 I'm buying the 17-70 for my first lens purchase to replace the kit. I've talk to quite a few people who have it and used it for sometime and they can't believe how well it has done for them. So I'll go with a vote for that one if you are looking for wide angle/small zoom. Severe Plains
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | Madweasel wrote in post #2557412 So the wrong end of the focal length scale and way above his price range. Apart from that, exactly what he's looking for! ![]()
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gacon1 Senior Member 639 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2006 More info | Jan 18, 2007 01:22 | #22 Tamron 17-50 f/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lostdoggy King Duffus 4,787 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Queens, NY More info | Jan 18, 2007 01:50 | #23 Best bang for the buck the kit lens, for about $50 it can't be beat for the money.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Jan 18, 2007 21:50 | #24 Hey thanks a bunch guys,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sboerup Senior Member 841 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: AZ More info | Jan 18, 2007 22:56 | #25 Man, and you thought the 70-200 f4 was good for that stuff. Wait till you experience the 200 1.8L, best night club lens out there (that is if you want to be the most conspicuous photographer there).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aussieskier just that stupid? 10,608 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Jan 18, 2007 22:59 | #26 I liked my Tamron 17-35 i picked it up for about 300 i have seen it for less since (used)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1161 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||