Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Jan 2007 (Wednesday) 15:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best bang for the buck lens. Need Help Fast!

 
Janika
Goldmember
Avatar
1,060 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ontario, CA
     
Jan 17, 2007 17:19 |  #16

Another vote for the Sigma 17-70 Dc macro, Nothing can touch it for the price!


(John) CANON A590 iS - EOS 50D - EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM - EF 50 f/1.8 II - Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 XR Di II - Velbon Sherpa pro - SIGMA DG500-ST
EOS 40D sold, EF 300 f/4L iS Sold

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jptsr1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,845 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 116
Joined Sep 2006
Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore
     
Jan 17, 2007 19:31 as a reply to  @ Janika's post |  #17

+1 for the Sigma 17-70

J.


Et Facta Est Lux
My Gear
Flickrexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizen_Insane
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ames, IA
     
Jan 17, 2007 20:44 |  #18

+1 Sigma 17-70, was a great replacement for my kit lens.


Gear
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallydog
Member
Avatar
37 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Jan 18, 2007 00:37 as a reply to  @ Citizen_Insane's post |  #19

Another nod for the Sigma 17-70




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jayson ­ Prentice
Senior Member
365 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lenexa, KS
     
Jan 18, 2007 00:38 |  #20

I'm buying the 17-70 for my first lens purchase to replace the kit. I've talk to quite a few people who have it and used it for sometime and they can't believe how well it has done for them. So I'll go with a vote for that one if you are looking for wide angle/small zoom.


Severe Plains (external link) -- Meteorologist -- Ham Radio Operator: KC0TQO
Canon Rebel XTi -- Sigma 500 DG Super
Canon 50mm f/1.8 -- Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5 -- Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Jan 18, 2007 01:18 as a reply to  @ Jayson Prentice's post |  #21

Madweasel wrote in post #2557412 (external link)
So the wrong end of the focal length scale and way above his price range. Apart from that, exactly what he's looking for! :rolleyes:

:lol: :lol: What do you expect in the lens forum ;)

Anyway, 17-70mm Sigma is the bang per buck king at the moment. Excellent throughout. Great flexibility and decent build/function.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gacon1
Senior Member
Avatar
639 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
     
Jan 18, 2007 01:22 |  #22

Tamron 17-50 f/2.8




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jan 18, 2007 01:50 |  #23

Best bang for the buck the kit lens, for about $50 it can't be beat for the money.

Now if you want sharp pics also then that is a diffrent story, maybe 11-22 or a 16-35.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persian-Rice
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,531 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Behind a viewfinder.
     
Jan 18, 2007 21:50 |  #24

Hey thanks a bunch guys,

I decided to lay off the lens for now and use my 28-75. Ill just buy the 17-40 or something that is strictly wide in a little while.

btw thanks for the wide 70-200....:P i had the 2.8......one of biggest regrets ive ever made was selling that thing.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sboerup
Senior Member
Avatar
841 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AZ
     
Jan 18, 2007 22:56 |  #25

Man, and you thought the 70-200 f4 was good for that stuff. Wait till you experience the 200 1.8L, best night club lens out there (that is if you want to be the most conspicuous photographer there).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aussieskier
just that stupid?
Avatar
10,608 posts
Joined Aug 2005
     
Jan 18, 2007 22:59 |  #26

I liked my Tamron 17-35 i picked it up for about 300 i have seen it for less since (used)
Cheers,
Riley




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,712 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Best bang for the buck lens. Need Help Fast!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1161 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.