Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 20 Jan 2007 (Saturday) 19:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Anybody jump from i9900 to Pixma Pro9000?

 
Lord_Malone
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jan 20, 2007 19:24 |  #1

Any significant improvements? I'm actually holding out for the Pro9500, but was just curious as to the performance of the 9000.


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebrewer
Senior Member
Avatar
786 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mohawk Valley, NY
     
Jan 20, 2007 21:16 |  #2

I was holding out for the 9500, but I gave in (Canon now says sometime in 2007 for the Pro9500). I went from an old S9000 to the Pixma Pro 9000 last week. My first observations are that the flesh tones are improved, and the blues seem more true. Also, black and white has no undesired tint, but is very slow.

Rich




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jan 20, 2007 21:52 |  #3

thebrewer wrote in post #2573601 (external link)
I was holding out for the 9500, but I gave in (Canon now says sometime in 2007 for the Pro9500). I went from an old S9000 to the Pixma Pro 9000 last week. My first observations are that the flesh tones are improved, and the blues seem more true. Also, black and white has no undesired tint, but is very slow.

Rich


Yeah, I thought about caving in, but I'm having a hard time justifying jumping from the i9900 to the Pro9000. Aside from a few nifty improvements, it's pretty much a lateral move. I think the Pro9500 will be a much more noticeable upgrade. I'd love to do more accurate B&W prints. I guess I'll continue to hold out and continue to squeeze more juice out of the i9900 for now. ;)


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 20, 2007 22:48 |  #4

I was about to cave in and go for the Canon Pro9000... I didnt want to wait for the Pro9500...

BUT... now I am looking into the R1800 and the R2400 Epson printing systems. Both Pigment based printers...

Anyone look into these? I hear the B&Ws off these are very good.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,910 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jan 20, 2007 23:02 |  #5

In all honesty, I'm not sure either would be a significant upgrade Malone.
The 9000 as you say is almost the same printer with similar dye inks,. (the the new Chromalife should be better for archival. It's sad that Canon would not allow the driver upgrade required to use these inks in the i9900 here in the US)

The 9500 is a switch to Pigment.. which might be seen as an upgrade, but again to me it's more of a "change" than an upgrade if you know what I mean.

think about what your motivation for switching is..

If it's to sell prints professionally and therefore offer more archival prints, and to use far more types of paper, then you want to go with Pigment.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 20, 2007 23:05 |  #6

I know a few people.. friends of mine, who own both pigment and dye... and they say both do different things... and put out different results.

I still have no idea which one I want tho =)

I dont know if I should just scrap the entire printer project and just keep going to costco, mpix, and local labs...


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jan 21, 2007 03:08 |  #7

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2574033 (external link)
In all honesty, I'm not sure either would be a significant upgrade Malone.
The 9000 as you say is almost the same printer with similar dye inks,. (the the new Chromalife should be better for archival. It's sad that Canon would not allow the driver upgrade required to use these inks in the i9900 here in the US)

The 9500 is a switch to Pigment.. which might be seen as an upgrade, but again to me it's more of a "change" than an upgrade if you know what I mean.

think about what your motivation for switching is..

If it's to sell prints professionally and therefore offer more archival prints, and to use far more types of paper, then you want to go with Pigment.


You're right, Jake. I'm not doing this gig for a living so I shouldn't even worry about it. What I really need to put my money into is a new PC with a multi-core processor. Thanks for your input, guys.


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 21, 2007 03:14 |  #8

I built a pretty sweet intel duo core system... as my work horse to my server...

Got to say... works wonders with photoshop.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jan 21, 2007 03:19 |  #9

StealthLude wrote in post #2574757 (external link)
I built a pretty sweet intel duo core system... as my work horse to my server...

Got to say... works wonders with photoshop.


Oh! Yes! Yes! Do tell!


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 21, 2007 03:29 |  #10

haha ok.

Systems a Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz chip. ASUS motherboard (highly recommend.. this is the 3-4th system I used ASUS with and never once had a problem, + their boards are very robust... 2 gigs ram, and 500 gig hard drives on raid 1... Gaming graphics card and various other things... Calibration etc...

This is all here just to compliment my storage server, which holds a total of 2000 gigs =) 3Ware raid card, Windows Server 2003 SBS, few of hard drives and dual Xeon processors.

I used to use a laptop and a Mac G5 1.8, but this system is a wonder to use... Ive had my Kasperski anti-virus software start a scheduled scan on a friday, while editing, and didnt even knotice it.... On my laptop, photoshop is almost unusable with AV running...

filters apply w/o even really thining... you get the idea.

Now i need a printer! I think im going to wait for a Canon PRO9500...


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quickben
Fairy Gapped
Avatar
1,512 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Whitley Bay, UK
     
Jan 22, 2007 09:30 |  #11

StealthLude wrote in post #2574792 (external link)
Now i need a printer! I think im going to wait for a Canon PRO9500...

I'm doing that aswell. I've got a i850 at the moment, so it will be a pretty big jump for me. Problem is, I've been waiting for bloody ages now ! I was going to get a i9950 (UK version of i9900) before they even announced the Pro Series, but then I thought they would release a pigment-based system, as Epson had one out for a while. So I waited and waited and waited etc.. Then they announced the Pro series, now I'm waiting and waiting and ... oh you get the picture.

I've seen some retailers quoting prices for them over here. Around £500 (about $930). I hope this means we'll be seeing them for sale soon !

Gary.


Fighting the war against the unnecessary use of the Book Worthy Smiley
My name is Gary, not Ben.
6D 24-70/2.8VC 85/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Jan 22, 2007 13:39 |  #12

well Lord. im in the same boat as you. i have the i9900, and although i love the prints it puts out i like the idea of longer archival inks on the pro9000 (and i wonder if it can print 8x10 in bordless, which the i9900 cant do). on the other hand, like you said, doesnt seem like a big upgrade. the pro9500 is what ive been waiting for, but it seems like its never going to come! and will probably be quite a bit more pricy when it does. ill probably hold out for the pro9500, and keep the i9900 for quick stuff (since the pigment ink takes 4times as long to print).


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebrewer
Senior Member
Avatar
786 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mohawk Valley, NY
     
Jan 22, 2007 19:45 |  #13

Billginthekeys wrote in post #2581672 (external link)
(and i wonder if it can print 8x10 in bordless, which the i9900 cant do).

Yes is can.

Rich




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Jan 22, 2007 20:13 |  #14

thebrewer wrote in post #2583500 (external link)
Yes is can.

Rich

thank you so much. thats one of the main points ive been wanting to know. no one seemed to be able to answer me in the thread i made about that issue :D


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,993 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Anybody jump from i9900 to Pixma Pro9000?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is txphotonurse
1215 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.