Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 21 Jan 2007 (Sunday) 23:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

SD600 taking blurry photos?

 
tenth8sphere
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 21, 2007 23:03 |  #1

I just bought an SD600 because it was supposed to be a major upgrade from my old 3.1 Kodak. But almost all the photos have a 'blur' and I can't zoom in nearly as far on images as I could in my old, cheaper Kodak.

I'm a novice to camera settings, but I was hoping for at least the SAME quality as my old camera, since this has twice the mega pixels. I have a couple of days before my time is up to return it. Can anyone suggest any settings or such that I might be doing to cause this?

Lighting seems off, photos are blurry in things up close and far. I've gotten a couple 'okay' shots, but even they didn't compare to the clunky old 3.1 cameras.

Any help? I really know nothing about settings. I've got everything, I think, on auto right now...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tenth8sphere
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 21, 2007 23:13 |  #2

Oh yes. the photos are also much DARKER, like the flash isn't lining up right or something.... none of them are bright at all




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aLFaDaRK
Senior Member
Avatar
751 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Jan 21, 2007 23:21 |  #3

Post some sample pictures to show what you mean perhaps?


Canon EOS 5D Mark III, Canon Speedlite 580EX II
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM, Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L USM, Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
Apple 15" Retina Macbook Pro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Jan 21, 2007 23:36 as a reply to  @ aLFaDaRK's post |  #4

It could be that you have your micro setting on. That would cause your normal distance shots to be blurry. Or the focus beam could be turned off. Check trobleshooting page 97 in your owner's manual.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Collin85
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,164 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sydney/Beijing
     
Jan 22, 2007 06:25 |  #5

Under what situations are you shooting? If you are shooting under poor lighting, the camera-chosen shutter speed will tend to be low. Without stabilization (such as a tripod, firm surface, IS etc.), blurry shots may ensue.

As for the pictures being darker and the flash not firing properly, are you sure your subjects are close enough to the camera? The SD600's flash head isn't the most powerful of sorts, so subjects too far away from the camera often end up underexposed.

I agree with aLFaDaRK - you should post some example shots.

Collin


Col | Flickr (external link)

Sony A7 + Leica 50 Lux ASPH, Oly E-M5 + 12/2
Canon 5D3, 16-35L, 50L, 85L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tenth8sphere
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 22, 2007 08:21 |  #6

Thanks for the responses. I'm shooting under all conditions, indoor and out. I'll post some images here:

This image was taken several times, all but one was this bad - and even that one had blurry edges around everything. This blur is a little worse than normal, but still happens around 1 in 15 shots usually. Tried with flash on, and off.
http://img300.imagesha​ck.us/my.php?image=203​891603eu.jpg (external link)

An example of my 'typical' blur effect. This is what is in almost all my photos.
http://img157.imagesha​ck.us/my.php?image=362​372475hc.jpg (external link)

Another example of typical blur. Our old camera never had this effect on it, and it was a cheap Kodak 3.1 megapixel.
http://img259.imagesha​ck.us/my.php?image=831​425992hr.jpg (external link)

As I said above, all the photos have a blur around the edges of subjects, and are darker. I don't have any of the old camera photos here, but I'll upload one when I get home. They're just sharper and brighter.

(My focus beam (the red/orange light, right?) is on, and I've got it running on auto.)

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Collin85
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,164 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sydney/Beijing
     
Jan 22, 2007 08:34 |  #7

ALL of those looks like camera shake blur. Chances are the shutter speed was simply too slow - as expected for the first two shots since they're indoors. Not so sure about the third one, there looks to be sufficient ambience light around for a decent shutter. From my knowledge, the IXUS cameras tend to prioritise high shutters over stopping down the aperture, but perhaps your shots demonstrated a few exceptions.

What shutter speeds were all those shots taken at?

Not so sure about the pics being dark though - the first two indoor pics seem adequately exposed. Perhaps you had your flash on? If your camera prioritises foreground exposure when flash is enabled, then your background may end up more underexposed. But then again this explanation has it's drawbacks since it would imply a high shutter was used (which should of prevented the blur in the first place). What time of day was the third pic taken in?


Col | Flickr (external link)

Sony A7 + Leica 50 Lux ASPH, Oly E-M5 + 12/2
Canon 5D3, 16-35L, 50L, 85L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tenth8sphere
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 22, 2007 08:55 |  #8

All of the pictures were on auto. My camera has an ISO of 800 max, and I think 400 as a 'normal' setting? I don't know much about it, but I'm pretty sure my HIGH iso is one of 800.

If this is camera shake blur, then I need to fix it. Maybe because my last camera was bigger it didn't shake as much when I held it? We NEVER got shots like these on the old camera. If this is the fault of me, does anyone have any way to tell? Maybe set it on a table and take the picture?

Can anyone recommend a small camera (I wanted one to go in my pocket) that won't be blurry like this if it IS shake blur? I can still return this one and pick up another.

As for darkness, I'll post another photo when I get home, but the old camera may have had a brighter flash or something, because the photos were all bright, these are almost like underdeveloped 35mm photos...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rabidcow
Goldmember
Avatar
1,100 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jan 22, 2007 09:08 |  #9

those were taken at 1/20 or slower it looks like (EXIF) so there is the problem. The shutter speed is just too slow.


Steven A. Pryor (external link)
Photo Manager, Prestige Portraits (Central Indiana)
Pixel peep or shoot...Pixel peep or shoot... or shoot... (external link)
Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tenth8sphere
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 22, 2007 09:19 |  #10

Rabidcow,

What can I do about it?? I've already tried taking some on ISO 800, and they still had the blur...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rabidcow
Goldmember
Avatar
1,100 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jan 22, 2007 10:41 |  #11

are you using the flash? if so then you might have a problem in full auto in regards to the camera meter, or you might just have bad batteries that cannot charge the capacitor fast enough. I have little experience with point and shoots, so my advice will not be all that great, I just know that your slow shutter speed is the cause of your blurry images.


Steven A. Pryor (external link)
Photo Manager, Prestige Portraits (Central Indiana)
Pixel peep or shoot...Pixel peep or shoot... or shoot... (external link)
Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMSphoto
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: PA
     
Jan 22, 2007 10:58 |  #12

My husband bought this camera a few months ago as a "take along" camera he could keep in his pocket. Although our photos aren't as severe as yours, I think the quality is lousy. I haven't been able to get a good shot out of it yet, no matter what settings I use. Terrible red eye, mostly out of focus, noise, dark, etc. I really do not like this camera at all. The first Canon I ever met that I didn't like :(


Stacey :D
Cameras: Canon 20D/BGE2; Canon Elan 7e; Canon G3
Canon Lenses: 18-55mm, 50mm 1.4
Tamron Lenses: 75-300mm, 28-80mm
Speedlite 420ex, LSII, NYIP Student

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tenth8sphere
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 22, 2007 11:27 |  #13

SMS Photo,

Thanks for the input. I guess I'll mess around with it a little tonight, and then send it back tomorrow for a refund if I can't get it working satisfactorily.

Can anyone recommend a high-qualty small take-along camera?? I really wanted something that could slip in my pocket.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Jan 22, 2007 12:06 as a reply to  @ tenth8sphere's post |  #14

Your pictures were taken at shutter speeds as low as 1/13. That's just too slow for handheld use. The same would be true with any camera. I have the 600, and I can get fantastic pictures with it. They are not out of focus, they are very clear and sharp. I have blown several up to 8X10 with great results. However, the flash is very weak, and taking inside pictures with low light is somewhat of a challenge. The SD600 is a good camera that takes good pictures, but if you plan to take many indoor, low light photos, it may not be the camera for you.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tenth8sphere
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 22, 2007 12:15 |  #15

Just Shootin,

The camera is on auto though, so how do I increase the shutter speed? You say yours turn out fine, and the shutterspeed in my problem - but how do I fix it? All I do is take pictures with auto settings...

Is there another portable camera with stronger flash? Maybe the 700, 800, 900 or a Nikon model?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,019 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
SD600 taking blurry photos?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2108 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.