Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 07 Mar 2004 (Sunday) 13:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Viewing Photo's online, Cable Service?

 
JZaun
Goldmember
2,488 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Mar 07, 2004 13:06 |  #1

I am not happy with my online service it is just too slow :evil: I hate having to wait for pic's to download and when there are several, I quite often give up and go to another post. Some peoples pic's seem to load faster than others, I guess it is their server. Now the real question

Does anyone here use cable service? I know it is faster but is it worth the cost ? (Your opinion) Is it that much faster than dial up considering the load on some servers out there?

Cable will cost me about $45 a month here and I have to buy a cable modem $80. I am currently spending $14.95 for great service but would like more speed.

Anyone have any information or feelings about this??

Thanks
JZaun




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Mar 07, 2004 13:52 |  #2

I love cable. My cable service (Comcast in Mass) give 3 meg download, which is theoretically fantastic, but something like 384 upload. Since I run my own webserver this is less than ideal, but that's probably not a concern to you.

The 3 meg download is the absolute max - a single average user will rarely see it, since almost no website will send to them at 3 meg. It does make a difference if you have multiple users or if you like to multi-browse. When waiting for one message to load I might also be in another forum or another site. I have absolutely no patience, so I flip back and forth a lot.

To compare cable to a dial-up modem is not a comparison. Cable is much, much faster. On an *average* site you will probably get 500-1000 Mb/s download speed. Compare to a 56K modem and you're running 9-18 times faster. If you manage to hit an idle server with a very good connection to the Internet you may actually get 3 Mb/s, but that's very rare. On the other end if you try browsing at the same time everyone else on your cable segment is browsing then that 3 meg number will go down quite a bit.

But it's still going to be a hell of a lot faster than a dial-up modem. Personally I think it's worth every penny. But the Internet is my job, one of my hobbies, and I also run my own web server and mail server out of my house. I'm not average. In fact I spent about 1.5 years paying $129 a month for a 1.5 Mb/s DSL line. And I thought that was worth every penny, too.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ajax
Member
213 posts
Joined Oct 2002
     
Mar 07, 2004 14:34 |  #3

I had a relatively speedy dial-up service for years. They sold out and their service suffered dramatically.

So, I held my breath and signed up for cable [comcast].

I am sooo glad I did! I was paying for a separate phone line, so the cost was only a bit more. I like it for the speed, as well as the fact that it is always "on", so it's convenient for quicky things. I find it far more reliable than the dial-up [though that could be due to my dial-up provider].




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IanD
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
5,342 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 463
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Lancaster, Ontario
     
Mar 07, 2004 14:49 |  #4

Jerry,
Believe it or not we actually have cable up here in Canada :lol:
Do not even think about it, just sign up for cable. It is worth the cost. Once you try it you will never go back to dial-up. The only problem is when you are on the road and cannot find a hotel/motel with HS and have to revert to dial-up. Very painful :cry:


Ian (®Feathers & Fur)
Have You Hugged Your Mallard Today?
More Images- (external link)My Gear
flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Laziferous
Goldmember
Avatar
1,570 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Mar 07, 2004 20:51 |  #5

I also have comcast, and I'd rather have no internet connection, than have to go back to dial-up. 3 mbps is just too good to let go.


blah something clever blah blahdie blah.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
Avatar
4,175 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Mar 07, 2004 20:52 |  #6

I have cable, and I like it. I've never had dial-up myself, so I can't compare to that.
If you get cable access, a firewall is a must, especially if you leave the PC up all the time.
I also found out after several months of frequent reboots that the cable modem (if you are USB) must be plugged into the PC, not a USB hub.

Have Fun
Rick 8)


Rick

My Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,406 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Viewing Photo's online, Cable Service?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1165 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.