Beau Hudspeth wrote in post #2612515
Welcome to the forums and welcome to your the next thing to consume all your $$$!
Ha! Thanks, Beau. I'm new to photography, but not to hobbies that siphon money out of one's wallet, what with being a musician. From the pictures you linked, it looks like you're one as well. 
Beau Hudspeth wrote in post #2612515
With that said: when shooting musical instruments, I find that in most cases, it is better if you have no background visible - and if you do have one make sure that is compliments the 'guitar' instead of detracting from it. This can be looked at in a logical way as well. For smaller things like flutes, for a BG [Background] you could use sheetmusic or a music stand. For medium sized things like guitars, a plain white, black or any muted solid colored bg is ok. Also, a nude woman works well too ...
I don't have any nude women hanging around the music room, so I'll have to go with one of your other suggestions. I thought the parquet floor created an interesting texture on the Stratocaster photo, but I can see how it comes off as distracting as well; it dilutes the beauty of the guitar itself. I'll try laying down a plain sheet to remove the pattern.
Beau Hudspeth wrote in post #2612515
For example, I shot these against a piece of black velvet
ONE
|
TWO
with a very short depth of field. This keeps the instrument in focus and lets the unnecessary stuff fall in to blur.
These are gorgeous pictures. I especially like the first of the two, showing the wound strings. Do you open the aperature more to shorten the field of view? I have a Canon A95, and I know I can vary the aperature, but this is completely new territory to me.
Beau Hudspeth wrote in post #2612515
Good luck and welcome to the wonderfully fun and expensive world of photography!

Thanks! I've been looking for an other fun, yet expensive, hobby.
- Keith