Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Jan 2007 (Sunday) 13:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why 'Petal' lens hoods?

 
Roy ­ Mathers
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jan 28, 2007 13:59 |  #1

Can anyone tell me if there is any scientific or optical reason why most of the lens hoods for the upmarket lenses seem to be what is called 'petal shaped'? I can't seem to see any sense in it (although I'm sure one of you boffins will put me right).

It would seem to me, without any science to back it up, that the most sensible shape for a lens hood would be rectangular. This surely would mimic the shape of the sensor and be a more effective shield. I once owned a Hasselblad and I remember that that had a square lens hood (again, mimicing the film format), so it is not a new idea.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calgaryphotographer
Senior Member
338 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Jan 28, 2007 14:11 |  #2

The 'petal' hoods are used on wider angle lenses (17-40, 16-35, heck even the 24-70 exhibits a petal detent) these are shaped perfectly so that when the lens is at it's widest setting the hood does not appear in the photos, yet still are shaped so that flare and glare can be controlled.


CANON EOS 300D | Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS | CANON EF-S 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 | Some soft Hood | CANON EF 75-300 F/4.5-5.6 III USM | Canon ET-60 Hood | Canon EF 50 f/1.8 | Canon ES-62 Hood | CANON 430EX | MANFROTTO TRIPOD | Canon RC-1 Remote | A WHACK OF BP-511'S | SANDISK CF CARDS | LOWEPRO MINI-TREKKER AW |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vctr
Member
Avatar
182 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jan 28, 2007 14:16 as a reply to  @ calgaryphotographer's post |  #3

Thank You, I was wondering myself. Hood on my Tamron 17-50 F/2.8


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


XSi 450D, Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 XR Di II, Tamron SP 70-300 F/4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon 50mm F/1.8 II, 430EX Flash, Power Shot S95.
http://vtassone.myphot​oalbum.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
Jan 28, 2007 14:26 |  #4

Actually there is no reason that the entire lens couldn't be made rectangular, except that it is much easier to design and manufacture circular lenses. After that, the shape of the lens hood is probably a combination of esthetics, manufacturing ease and marketing.

The petal shape allows a longer hood on the top and bottom, an medium hood on the sides and a shorter hood on the corners. A rectangular hood could not have the corners any longer than the corner portion of a circular hood. The top, bottom and sides could still stick out further resulting in petals on a rectangle. The problem with this is that the petals would be flat and more subject to deformation or damage than the petals on a circular hood.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
troutbreath
Senior Member
Avatar
771 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: The Dash, North Carolina
     
Jan 28, 2007 15:40 |  #5

Don't know about the hood, but I like that lens cap design.


Canon Digital Rebel XT, Canon 30D, Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L, Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, Canon EF 85mm f1.8 USM, Canon EF 50mm f1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 10-22 USM, Canon EF-S 18-55mm, 430 EX Speedlite, 580 EXII Speedlight
Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 APO EX DG HSM, Sigma 1.4x APO TC
Canon Rebel S 35mm, Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vctr
Member
Avatar
182 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jan 28, 2007 15:44 as a reply to  @ troutbreath's post |  #6

This one.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


XSi 450D, Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 XR Di II, Tamron SP 70-300 F/4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon 50mm F/1.8 II, 430EX Flash, Power Shot S95.
http://vtassone.myphot​oalbum.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jan 28, 2007 16:41 |  #7

I love that lens cap design too - why on earth don't Canon do it? It would save an awful lot of fiddling around!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 28, 2007 16:43 |  #8

ScottE wrote in post #2614825 (external link)
Actually there is no reason that the entire lens couldn't be made rectangular, except that it is much easier to design and manufacture circular lenses. After that, the shape of the lens hood is probably a combination of esthetics, manufacturing ease and marketing.

I can think of several reasons, not the least of which is focusing and zooming.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jan 28, 2007 16:55 |  #9

20drgoger - would you care to elaborate?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
verty
Goldmember
Avatar
1,459 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
     
Jan 28, 2007 17:02 |  #10

does the petal hood have to be alwayz sitting in the same way?
or can you just screw it in and it doesnt matter where the petals sit above the lens?


5D Mark II || 550 D || 350 D || Canon 17-40L || Canon 24-70L || Canon 50 1.4 || Canon 70-200L IS 2.8 || 580 EX Speedlight || 480 EX speedlight x2 || Manfrotto 190CXPro3 + 488 RC2 || Cybersyncs

Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lkrms
"stupidly long verbal diarrhoea"
Avatar
4,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia
     
Jan 28, 2007 17:07 |  #11

verty wrote in post #2615509 (external link)
does the petal hood have to be alwayz sitting in the same way?
or can you just screw it in and it doesnt matter where the petals sit above the lens?

Circular hoods (like the 50/1.4's hood) sometimes have threading that allows the hood to settle in various positions. Petal ones only lock into the correct position (long edge top and bottom).


Luke
Headshot photographer Sydney and Newcastle (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
Jan 28, 2007 17:21 |  #12

Roy Mathers wrote in post #2615486 (external link)
20drgoger - would you care to elaborate?

Many lenses are designed so that the elements rotate when focusing or zooming which would not be possible if the lens elements were rectangular. However, it is possible to design a lens where the elements move without rotating.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
verty
Goldmember
Avatar
1,459 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
     
Jan 28, 2007 17:23 |  #13

linarms wrote in post #2615528 (external link)
Circular hoods (like the 50/1.4's hood) sometimes have threading that allows the hood to settle in various positions. Petal ones only lock into the correct position (long edge top and bottom).

thanx for that! ive always wondered if that was the case


5D Mark II || 550 D || 350 D || Canon 17-40L || Canon 24-70L || Canon 50 1.4 || Canon 70-200L IS 2.8 || 580 EX Speedlight || 480 EX speedlight x2 || Manfrotto 190CXPro3 + 488 RC2 || Cybersyncs

Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tellingthm
Member
200 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: oakland
     
Jan 28, 2007 18:07 |  #14

verty wrote in post #2615509 (external link)
does the petal hood have to be alwayz sitting in the same way?
or can you just screw it in and it doesnt matter where the petals sit above the lens?

you can try locking the hood on, and then turning it back slightly. depending on the lens the and crop factor of the camea, you'll notice immediately why hood are petal-shaped. and unless they're in the correct position, they'll show up in the image.


i've made a huge mistake.

gear list


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tellingthm
Member
200 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: oakland
     
Jan 28, 2007 18:09 |  #15

calgaryphotographer wrote in post #2614771 (external link)
The 'petal' hoods are used on wider angle lenses (17-40, 16-35, heck even the 24-70 exhibits a petal detent) these are shaped perfectly so that when the lens is at it's widest setting the hood does not appear in the photos, yet still are shaped so that flare and glare can be controlled.

even certain tele's have petal-shaped hoods. i know my 70-200/2.8 IS does.


i've made a huge mistake.

gear list


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,348 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Why 'Petal' lens hoods?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1608 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.