Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Jan 2007 (Monday) 09:58
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "135 L, or the unknown"
135 L - go with the red ring. . . .
39
90.7%
The mysterious and wonderful unknown
4
9.3%

43 voters, 43 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

135 L or. . . I don't know!

 
goatee
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 29, 2007 09:58 |  #1

So, my 30th is fast approaching, and my wonderful wife asked if there's a lens I want. The only lens I would like (and is anyway affordable) is a 135 f/2 L (otherwise the 50mm f/1.2L would be on the list!). The thing is, she said she's more than happy to co-ordinate between her and my family, and hers to get everyone to chip in to pay for one, and. . . . I'd have the most awesome portrait lens that I would treasure for ever. If not, well, I don't know - she's sorting something out for me, and said I'd still get it, but a very scaled down version if she gets me the L (plus my family, and in-laws will just chip in as opposed to getting me different things).

Now, if I don't go for the L, there's next to no chance of me being able to afford it for around 20 years - the kids are growing fast, and their demands on my wallet are also growing! But, I still have my 85mm f/1.8 (her present to me last year :D), so it's not as though I'm without a great portrait lens. . . .


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bacchanal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,284 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
     
Jan 29, 2007 10:18 |  #2

If you like the FL, I don't think you can go wrong buying the most affordable L prime that I can think of. If it were me, I'd want the 35L, which would be great indoors around the house and isn't too much more expensive.


Drew A. | gear | photosexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KAS
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
     
Jan 29, 2007 10:19 |  #3

Personally, I think 135 woudl be a bit long on a 20d...so I say have a fun birthday with whatever they have planned, and wait for the next lens announcement....

but then again, it is a great lens...

just my 2 cents


1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)

| Niagara Weddings & Portraits - Afterglow Images (external link)
| Niagara Weddings & Portraits - Afterglow Images Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidEB
Goldmember
Avatar
3,117 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 29, 2007 10:19 |  #4

awesome for portraits, awesome for indoor events (think of those kid music performances on a poorly lit school auditorium stage), awesome for sports (fast fast fast focus). Get the 1.4x tc with it -- this lens performs really well with that combo and adds a lot of versatility.

I love mine. Can't take a bad photo with it.


David
my stuff - [URL="http://www.pbase​.com/davideb"]my gallery - [URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=3928125&postcou​nt=1"]go Rats!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inthedeck
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,579 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1140
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. Augustine, Florida
     
Jan 29, 2007 10:23 |  #5

I was thinking about the same thing. Either the 135L, or the 15mm Fisheye. I spoke to my wife about it...and she said either one would be a great addition...but since I have been wanting the 15mm fishy for a while, I opted to get that instead. Should be here soon...

As for the 135L...that might show up later this year...once we move...or around that time. Who knows...it's on my list...and from what I hear, is a great lens. I doubt many owners would have a hard time recommending it. Go for it!


MCSquared Photography (external link) on WWW
MCSquared Photography (external link) on Flickr
MCSquared Photography (external link) on IG
My name: Manish.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stan43
Goldmember
Avatar
1,206 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Louisville KY
     
Jan 29, 2007 11:00 |  #6

I think David nailed it. The 135 is a little long on a crop body but it offers all the things in his reply. There will be many uses for this fast ,sharp, contrasty lens.
I know you will love it.

Stan


Canon: 5DSr,5Dmk3,1DXmk2 5d MK4,11-24L,35L,70-200 2.8L2,24-105L,24-70L,Sigma 24-105 Art,50 1.4 Art,Tamron SP85 1.8,Tamron SP90 Macro. Zeiss 135 F2 Milvus
Pentax 645Z,90 2.8 Macro,55 2.8,24-48 . Fuji: EX2,XT1,14mm,18-55,56,55-200,Zeis Touit 2.8 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 29, 2007 11:14 |  #7

Well, when I was talking about it with my wife, I said it would only be useable outdoors because of the focal length, and she quickly piped up "yes, but you spend increasing amounts of time outdoors with the boys", which is true. Hmm, atm it's looking like the lens :).


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markbluemica
Senior Member
Avatar
420 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: derbyshire,uk
     
Jan 29, 2007 13:48 |  #8

goatee when i had my 30d id never use my 135 on it as i did find it too long but its a dream on my 5d


www.markhaywoodphotogr​aphy.co.uk (external link)
canon 5d with grip
canon 135 f2L,canon 17-40 f4 L,canon 24-70 f2.8 L
canon 70-200 2.8 L is,canon 2x converter
epson stylus pro 4000 and Elinchrom lights

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Jan 29, 2007 14:42 |  #9

I don't think you'd regret going for the 135L. Just about everything about it is good. Plan to add a 1.4 TC to it for your next birthday and it'll be even better.


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger ­ Cicala
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
     
Jan 29, 2007 14:47 |  #10

I'll be the alternative viewpoint: I loved my 135L on a 20D when I shot it. It gave superb head and shoulders portraits outdoors or at a distance indoors. And as David mentioned good at school events, kids sports, etc. It lived on my camera.


My gear is www.lensrentals.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 29, 2007 16:03 |  #11

Thanks for the votes of confidence for it on a crop body. To be honest, I love my 85 on a crop body, and 105mm isn't that far from 135 and is useable indoors carefully - though the extra 2 stops of light that the 135 has will be lovely, not to mention the colours, contrast, and razor sharp focus. . . Hmm, I think I'm definitely falling for the 135 :). The TC is a great idea for next year's pressie - is the 2x TC useable, or should I stick to the 1.4?


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inthedeck
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,579 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1140
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. Augustine, Florida
     
Jan 29, 2007 17:30 |  #12

1.4xTC has been better for me. Used to have a 2xTC, but sold it. Didn't think to keep it, but didn't really like it. The 1.4xTC will never leave.


MCSquared Photography (external link) on WWW
MCSquared Photography (external link) on Flickr
MCSquared Photography (external link) on IG
My name: Manish.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jan 29, 2007 17:35 |  #13

Ah, go with the 135L. Once you've used it a while, you'll love it. I've used it on both 1.6 crop, 1.3 crop and FF bodies and it's just a lovely lens all the way around.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inthedeck
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,579 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1140
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. Augustine, Florida
     
Jan 29, 2007 17:43 |  #14

Mark hath spoken. You can count on his advice, should you need further persuasion.


MCSquared Photography (external link) on WWW
MCSquared Photography (external link) on Flickr
MCSquared Photography (external link) on IG
My name: Manish.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 30, 2007 02:12 |  #15

Hmm - 85% of the polled results (with no hanging thingummies) so far go with the lens. Will talk to the wife tonight :)


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,816 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
135 L or. . . I don't know!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1739 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.