Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Jan 2007 (Monday) 09:58
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "135 L, or the unknown"
135 L - go with the red ring. . . .
39
90.7%
The mysterious and wonderful unknown
4
9.3%

43 voters, 43 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

135 L or. . . I don't know!

 
mrfourcows
Goldmember
Avatar
2,108 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: london
     
Jan 30, 2007 04:34 |  #16

seriously try shooting at the 105mm end of your 24-105L for everything and see if you will be able to get used to it.

don't buy it just because you 'want' it. besides, you can get a few more shorter primes for the price of a 135L.


gear | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pturton
Senior Member
733 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Region Niagara, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 30, 2007 06:50 |  #17

Get the 135L and start saving for the 35L. The 135L is great for those tight crop portraits and some indoor sports and stage venues. The only reason to stop down is to get more DOF. It is very useful on crop bodies and works well with the EF 1.4 TC.


Almost forgot....
Happy Birthday and many more!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ianfp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Jan 30, 2007 07:00 |  #18

People told me I would find the 135L too long - I'm glad I ignored them! You can shoot close up indoors from around 1.5m and the results are fantastic. I haven't had much opportunity to shoot outdoors with it, but the few shots I have taken are really pleasing. It is a great lens!


Ian
Nikon D850, 85mm f/1.4G
5D2
EF17-40 f/4.0 L, EF135 f/2.0L EF200 f/2.8L

EF24-105L, EF100 f/2.8L Macro. EOS-M, 22mm f/2
Hasselblad 500C/M, Planar 80mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huhging
Goldmember
1,092 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 30, 2007 07:15 |  #19

135L is not the lense that stays on my 20D all the time, but it is the lense that I reach for when I anticipate best shots outdoors, and when I want a nice shoulder-up portraits shots.
I use it more than 70-200 2.8L.
It's that good.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrfourcows
Goldmember
Avatar
2,108 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: london
     
Jan 30, 2007 07:22 |  #20

Ianfp wrote in post #2624808 (external link)
You can shoot close up indoors from around 1.5m and the results are fantastic.

actually its 0.9m, isn't it. and the foucs limiter brings it to 1.6m thereafter.


gear | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 30, 2007 07:23 |  #21

I have a 20D and the 135L and the 1.4x TC. When I was shooting 35mm film the 200mm lens was one of my most used. The 135L gives me a simular field/prospective on the 20D that I was used to with the 200mm on my 35mm camera. It's too long for a serious head and shoulder shot (flattens prospective too much), I used a 90mm with the 35mm camera for these shots. I use my 24-70L for portrait, I would think you could do well with your 24-105L if you don't go too long.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrfourcows
Goldmember
Avatar
2,108 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: london
     
Jan 30, 2007 07:24 |  #22

Jaetie wrote in post #2624464 (external link)
don't buy it just because you 'want' it. besides, you can get a few more shorter primes for the price of a 135L.

you know what? i take back what i said. i too bought the 135L for the sole reason of wanting it. but i subsequently bought all the shorter primes too.


gear | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 30, 2007 07:50 |  #23

lol. Actually, I do find that I use the 105 end a reasonable amount, and can see that I would really like the 135. When I got my 85mm I used it as my walkaround for weeks - now I save it for portraits. My only concern is that my 85mm lens won't see so much action - unless of course I sacrifice it to help finance the 135. . .


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poah
Goldmember
1,003 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow
     
Jan 30, 2007 08:33 |  #24

get the 135 f2. FL is good on a crop body and if its too long swap to 85 and job done.


Free printer profiles PM me for info

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 30, 2007 08:37 |  #25

Thanks poah - I think you're probably right - then the only other lens I'll want to complete my setup is the Sigma 30mm f/1.4.


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ianfp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Jan 30, 2007 17:40 |  #26

Jaetie wrote in post #2624880 (external link)
actually its 0.9m, isn't it. and the foucs limiter brings it to 1.6m thereafter.

Yes, you are right!

BTW I bought an extension ring to allow closer work and I am planning on adding a 1.4TC to give me effectively a 200mm f/2.8 for longer stuff! So it is quite flexible and has stunning IQ even if not as practical as a zoom.
Ian


Ian
Nikon D850, 85mm f/1.4G
5D2
EF17-40 f/4.0 L, EF135 f/2.0L EF200 f/2.8L

EF24-105L, EF100 f/2.8L Macro. EOS-M, 22mm f/2
Hasselblad 500C/M, Planar 80mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,817 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
135 L or. . . I don't know!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1739 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.