Who owns a 70-200 L?

I used to have an f/4L non-IS but then I sold it because I wasn't using it at all.
Now I'm looking into getting the f/2.8L IS because I feel it would be a useful addition for (indoor) sports (135L is great but often a bit short, 300/4L IS is too long and slow)

Where's the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 option?

2.8 IS

I first bought non IS, bought IS after two shaky hands months, no regrets.

I've got the 2.8 non IS and love it. Great lense and super sharp.

f/4 IS. Got it recently and haven't even USED it yet because Canon is taking longer than expected on calibrating my camera.

70-200 F/2.8L IS for me

and me

blackshadow wrote in post #2635311
Loving my f2.8L

As am I.

I have the older, 80-200 f/2.8L. I voted for the 70-200 f/2.8L non-IS, as the 80-200 is just as good optically (if not a bit better), and there's no way I'm buying the 70-200 variant unless mine breaks.

I would consider the 70-200 f/4L IS if I had the money....good for a more compact general usage / travel lens.

one more xD
f4 non-IS

70-200 2.8 YAY!

Havent used my f4 since I got my 300 f2.8. Too slow, too short, and only one body, so it languishes at home while I go play. Anyone looking for mint used....?

f2.8 non IS works for me.

Stu

It is the first lens I bought. 70-200 f2.8 IS.