Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 01 Feb 2007 (Thursday) 18:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

F stops for various shots

 
lil_miss
Goldmember
Avatar
4,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Feb 01, 2007 18:45 |  #1

this is probably already somewhere in here - but I've done a brief search and not found what I'm looking for...

I'm trying to decide if our new Sigma 24-70 F2.8 EX DG (replacement version) is still not performing as it should. I believe I should be getting better quality images from it..

What would be a standard f stop for say a full length bride and groom shot that you would use? Bearing in mind it would be at say 50mm approx and standing a couple of meters away...

Some photos I took on the weekend were on F7.1 and still weren't overly sharp.. Light was bright.. I would have expected alot more from it.. i'm beginning to wonder if I'm doing something wrong ... :S


A bunch of Canon bits and pieces.

Blog (external link) :: Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberPet
Hiding Under a Rock
Avatar
4,052 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Piteå, Sweden
     
Feb 01, 2007 18:51 |  #2

Maybe it's not you, but the lens?

Pixel peep and see if there's an issue with front or back focus, which is sometimes the issue with some lenses. With an f-stop at f/8 or close - with only one or two people in the frame, you should have good focus where you aimed your focus point.

If you feel unsure if you had everything within the focal plane, try this link and calculate the numbers: http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)


/Petra Hall
Click here to view my geeky gear list
I shoot as much as possible in available light... sometimes, my flash is available – Joe Buissink

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobKirkwood
Goldmember
1,124 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
     
Feb 01, 2007 19:04 as a reply to  @ CyberPet's post |  #3

What was your shutter speed?
Can you post an image so we can see what you mean?

We used to have a Sigma 24-70 f2.8 and it was generally a good, sharp lens - a bit soft at F2.8, and it would sometimes miss focus (on a 350D at the time), but we still got many good sharp photos out of it.

Rob




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 01, 2007 19:22 |  #4

http://www.focustestch​art.com/ (external link)

Do the test on a tripod, 3 times, refocus to infinity in better each time. Do it in a well let room, at F2.8, and at F8. Post the most representative images, preferably a 100% crop.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lil_miss
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Feb 01, 2007 19:30 |  #5

Thanks - we did all the test charts on the original lens and it was about 40mm front focusing! Hence why we got a replacement.. this one is about 5-10mm front which I would consider not too bad.. yet the photos are still not looking right :S I will post some tonight


A bunch of Canon bits and pieces.

Blog (external link) :: Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 01, 2007 20:53 |  #6

Send it back, or have it calibrated.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lil_miss
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Feb 02, 2007 02:12 |  #7

Seems to be consistent with shooting at 24mm or at the other end.. apparently a trait of the lens.. we are going to try and take it back and exchange for something else.. may have to pay more but you get what you pay for .. perhaps Canon this time! :P


A bunch of Canon bits and pieces.

Blog (external link) :: Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 02, 2007 06:05 |  #8

Get the 17-55, I likey.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lil_miss
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Feb 02, 2007 15:11 |  #9

that's what we're possibly considering..


A bunch of Canon bits and pieces.

Blog (external link) :: Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
i2iSTUDIOS
Goldmember
1,010 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 02, 2007 15:25 as a reply to  @ lil_miss's post |  #10

5-10mm is far too much. On testing if it's not spot on, I'm not happy. :( Send it back to get it calibrated.


i2iSTUDIOS.com (external link)
My Blog (external link)

D800
D3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lil_miss
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Feb 02, 2007 20:07 |  #11

Yeah and that would take too long. Apparently it can't be done here in NZ the sigma agents have told me. They would need to send it to Japan. I dont have that long to wait. I have weddings to do. This is why they replaced our first one and after being told it would take a few days - that took 3 weeks too!! I'd rather take it back and get a refund and spend my money on something else that I can use straight away.


A bunch of Canon bits and pieces.

Blog (external link) :: Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wilky95
Senior Member
Avatar
658 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Isle of Wight, England
     
Feb 03, 2007 09:40 |  #12

Well I have had niggly focus problems with my Tameron 28-75 2.8 and often wondered if it was a lens problem, well thanks to Tims link and 10 mins of my time I now know that its the operator not the lens at fault:rolleyes:

Thanks for the link tim.

Martin.


i2iSTUDIOS wrote in post #2644303 (external link)
5-10mm is far too much. On testing if it's not spot on, I'm not happy. :( Send it back to get it calibrated.


"I am an incompetent so ignore :p "
http://www.wightphotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,051 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
F stops for various shots
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1630 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.