Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 02 Feb 2007 (Friday) 02:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Recommend an Ultra-Zoom under $300?

 
Dario ­ D.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
221 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton, Georgia
     
Feb 04, 2007 21:32 |  #16

eccles wrote in post #2655096 (external link)
@Saudidave, you're right of course but I wouldn't mind betting others will look at this thread given its title. So despite the OP answering his own question, further input from owners is still useful for others. However, duplicating large photos in quotes is not so useful and merely wastes bandwidth.

Actually, if the image source is the same, it doesn't waste bandwidth. Your computer only downloads each image once, even if there are 10,000 instances of that image on a page.

And I don't know why you think I answered my own question, unless you meant something else, and didn't mean it in a negative way. I couldn't have come to the conclusion of sticking to my camea without the insightful input from others.


My site (external link) | GIMP, the free Photoshop clone (external link) | Bokeh (background blur) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
riley1
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Feb 05, 2007 00:48 |  #17

just a heads up that dell small business currently has the S2 for $227.96 + tax




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saudidave
Senior Member
415 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Poynton, Cheshire, UK
     
Feb 05, 2007 03:07 |  #18

eccles wrote in post #2655096 (external link)
@Saudidave, you're right of course but I wouldn't mind betting others will look at this thread given its title. So despite the OP answering his own question, further input from owners is still useful for others. However, duplicating large photos in quotes is not so useful and merely wastes bandwidth.

I agree regarding duplication of large photos - that was unintentional and I was not aware of how to remove it once posted. However an even greater watse of bandwith are the massive number of posts that are placed, where it is obvious that the poster hasn't read the thread and duplicates replies or replies incorrectly, as in this case. Furthermore, replies such as happened here, where a reccomend isd posted that has been discounted earlier in the thread are stupid, uneccesary and downright frustrating and irritating. The biggest single problem in this and other forums are well intentioned individuals who don't bother to read the damn thing properly.


Panasonic TZ5 ;Canon IXUS 850; (Canon 400D, 17-85IS; 75-300; bag; filters and all that stuff given to my very clever daughter for passing her exams!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mgw189
Senior Member
366 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 05, 2007 10:44 |  #19

Saudidave wrote in post #2656998 (external link)
I agree regarding duplication of large photos - that was unintentional and I was not aware of how to remove it once posted. However an even greater watse of bandwith are the massive number of posts that are placed, where it is obvious that the poster hasn't read the thread and duplicates replies or replies incorrectly, as in this case. Furthermore, replies such as happened here, where a reccomend isd posted that has been discounted earlier in the thread are stupid, uneccesary and downright frustrating and irritating. The biggest single problem in this and other forums are well intentioned individuals who don't bother to read the damn thing properly.


You click the edit button go back into your post and delete the image information from the post you quoted. The information should look something like [IMG].....[IMG]. By deleting that line of information the image will not show up in your quote.


My flickr (external link)

Canon 50D 28-135 f5.6 , 50mm f1.8 , 75-300 f5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,560 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Recommend an Ultra-Zoom under $300?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2469 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.