Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 03 Feb 2007 (Saturday) 01:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

HDR Chicago Bears Skyline...

 
chicagoastronomer
Member
Avatar
73 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 03, 2007 01:23 |  #1

Chicago Skyline Lights up for the Chicago Bears

This evening after a very freezing & bitter cold night of guiding public astronomical viewing at the Adler Planetarium as a Telescope Operator, I took time out to capture a rare photographic event with our skyline. Chicago is going nuts over the Chicago Bears going to the Super-bowl, (Over doing it really - get a life, eh?), But I wanted to record it, and this time I took the 3 bracketed shots to create a post HDR image.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/josephguzman/PowerShot%20S3/HDR/skyline3a.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/josephguzman/PowerShot%20S3/HDR/skyline3b.jpg

The first one is the combined three image HDR shot. The second one is the normal exposed shot from the S3. The city shore of Lake Michigan is frozen over now and makes for a nice glaze.


IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/josephguzman/PowerShot%20S3/HDR/skyline3c.jpg

A close up of our buildings in a Non-HDR image.

The HDR process could use a bit more tweaking, but I'm satisfied with it.

It was incredibly cold and bitter standing out the howling winds to get these shots, but well worth it!...:smug:

Chicago Astronomer Joe
Administrator
www.chicagoastronomer.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxZoom
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Feb 03, 2007 07:15 |  #2

As an astronomer you took this shot to complain about light pollution?:D
Sweet shot, I for one appreciate you getting cold.:mrgreen:


Max :rolleyes:
There's no such thing as a bad photo, just the wrong audience.
EQUIPMENT: Canon Powershot S3 IS, 2x Transcend 2GB x150 SD, 2x 4GB Class 4 Dane-Elec SDHC, LensMate 52mm Adapter Tube and lots of stuff to hang on it.
A couple of flashes and a couple of strobes. My other camera is a Sony DSC-P200.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chicagoastronomer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
73 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 03, 2007 09:51 as a reply to  @ MaxZoom's post |  #3

As an astronomer you took this shot to complain about light pollution?



The Irony!

It's amazing that even with this tremendous source of light pollution right off our front door step at the Adler Planetarium, we can still target celestial objects with modest equipment. Galaxies, Nebulae, star clusters...it's all there mocking the intense orange glow of Chicago's light pollution.

Thanks for the appreciation.


Chicago Astronomer Joe
Administrator
www.chicagoastronomer.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAS ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
502 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois
     
Feb 03, 2007 10:40 |  #4

very nice work. On panoaramics you might want to crop the shot more to get rid of all that empty space (not hte reflection but at least some of the sky). It will enlarge your image and give more detail. Heres a shot of mine from the same place. 8 images merged together. http://www.pasphotogra​phy.com …o_Skyline_Poste​r_Copy.jpg (external link) (at night)
http://www.pasphotogra​phy.com …/CHI_Cityscape_​2_copy.jpg (external link) (daytime a few weeks ago)

Paul


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/photographypas/ (external link)
http://submit.shutters​tock.com/?ref=66057 (external link)
Catch my "How to Take Lightning Photos" Article and Photos in Shutterbug Magazine coming out soon this Year!!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gospastic
Member
185 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Feb 03, 2007 14:52 |  #5

i went out last night to get some shots of the city. i couldn't feel my toes. it was pretty damn cold. but it was worth it.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheresaH
Member
40 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: maple ridge, bc
     
Feb 03, 2007 16:31 |  #6

those are some very cool shots




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chicagoastronomer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
73 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 03, 2007 17:36 |  #7

Thanks for the comments.

No, I deceided to keep the sky above the skyline as it was on the HDR version. You can see from the original that some of the sky was cropped, but to have it just on the sklyline would have overpowered the image. It shows the light pollution glow drop off and keeping it small here for display keeps the loading time down.

It follows the 1/3's philosphy anyway, but is any image a poor one?

Nice pana of the skyline.


Chicago Astronomer Joe
Administrator
www.chicagoastronomer.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mishnogram
Senior Member
Avatar
264 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
     
Feb 03, 2007 17:43 |  #8

Sorry but what is HDR? I've seen some people talk of it.


Min
Canon Rebel xt with kit len, Sigma 55-200mm F4-5.6 DC, Canon S2IS, & not enough time to use them all.
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/mishnogram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAS ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
502 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois
     
Feb 03, 2007 18:14 |  #9

Chicagoastronomer, So whats the best way to find out when the northern lights will be visible down this far again?


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/photographypas/ (external link)
http://submit.shutters​tock.com/?ref=66057 (external link)
Catch my "How to Take Lightning Photos" Article and Photos in Shutterbug Magazine coming out soon this Year!!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxZoom
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Feb 04, 2007 02:13 |  #10

mishnogram wrote in post #2649652 (external link)
Sorry but what is HDR? I've seen some people talk of it.

High Dynamic Range - is a specialist technique which can give hyperrealistic results or simply avoid loosing information in a high contrast scene beyond the capability of a normal sensor (digital or film).
It involves combining the same scene at two or more different exposures, by underexposing you capture details normally blown out and by over exposing to capture details lost in shadows.
ChicagoAstro has achieved a natural looking result which may not seem like HDR but notice how the sky fades from orange to deep blue (from an overexposed shot) and the colors of the lights have retained their full intensity (from an underexposed shot).


Max :rolleyes:
There's no such thing as a bad photo, just the wrong audience.
EQUIPMENT: Canon Powershot S3 IS, 2x Transcend 2GB x150 SD, 2x 4GB Class 4 Dane-Elec SDHC, LensMate 52mm Adapter Tube and lots of stuff to hang on it.
A couple of flashes and a couple of strobes. My other camera is a Sony DSC-P200.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chicagoastronomer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
73 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 04, 2007 09:34 |  #11

PAS,

Aurora activity is caused by large Coronal Mass Ejections and the resulting sunpots.

The best way to monitor sunspot activity is to visit spaceweather.com on a regular basis. There, notice will be provided when to expect a good display.

On the HDR process...

Max is correct,

I was intimidated by the HDR process and thought it was out of my reach when I first read about it. But with a simple basic free HDR program (FDR Tools), it's relatively easy. There are more sophisticated programs out there, but for now this is fine.

On this one of the skyline, I exposed three shots. With the Powershot S3, we have an option to bracket shots and I exposed them 2-/+ on each side of the normal exposure. As long as you keep the same perspective of the image using a tripod, it's almost foolproof.

Not too bad.


Chicago Astronomer Joe
Administrator
www.chicagoastronomer.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxZoom
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Feb 04, 2007 09:53 |  #12

chicagoastronomer wrote in post #2652736 (external link)
Max is correct,

Phew! Would hate to have got it wrong. Thanks.


Max :rolleyes:
There's no such thing as a bad photo, just the wrong audience.
EQUIPMENT: Canon Powershot S3 IS, 2x Transcend 2GB x150 SD, 2x 4GB Class 4 Dane-Elec SDHC, LensMate 52mm Adapter Tube and lots of stuff to hang on it.
A couple of flashes and a couple of strobes. My other camera is a Sony DSC-P200.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eccles
Goldmember
Avatar
2,948 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Feb 04, 2007 18:11 |  #13

Sounds similar to the technique of focus stacking used by macro photographers except it's exposure stacking. Whatever, the results are very impressive.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAS ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
502 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois
     
Feb 05, 2007 00:42 |  #14

To me HDR looks better than a standard image for "most" low light landscapes like chicagoastronomer did. The image seems to pop more even if it is slighly surreal and almost looks fake as described by some. This is an HDR I took from North Ave. beach a few months back composed of 3 images merged with photomatix, 1 stop above and below. Its a very popular stock photo seller too.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Paul

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/photographypas/ (external link)
http://submit.shutters​tock.com/?ref=66057 (external link)
Catch my "How to Take Lightning Photos" Article and Photos in Shutterbug Magazine coming out soon this Year!!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,011 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
HDR Chicago Bears Skyline...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2469 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.