My sig is one line, about ten characters. Yours in the same place would take up 1/4 of the image, or be too small to read easily. This is assuming a 500px wide image, I don't post bigger than that because then people print them, watermark or not.
| POLL: "Which one?" |
 1) | 9 34.6% |
| 2) | 1 3.8% |
| 3) | 11 42.3% |
| 4) | 5 19.2% |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Feb 05, 2007 03:52 | #16 My sig is one line, about ten characters. Yours in the same place would take up 1/4 of the image, or be too small to read easily. This is assuming a 500px wide image, I don't post bigger than that because then people print them, watermark or not. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2007 03:55 | #17 oh - sorry I mis-understood. I thought you meant the logo was too big...yes I agree with you - the sig is too big www.jolenestewartphotography.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2007 03:59 | #18 better?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. www.jolenestewartphotography.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Feb 05, 2007 03:59 | #19 I'd make the words bigger so you can read them, and lose the balloons. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2007 04:02 | #20 tim wrote in post #2657123  I'd make the words bigger so you can read them, and lose the balloons. They are not balloons...but now you mention it they do look like them! www.jolenestewartphotography.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
italianfemmy Goldmember  2,252 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2007 04:10 | #21  Permanent banJo.. I love them whatever they are but this is my personal taste. I think it would be boring without them. But, to each their own. Gear List - Rebel xTi; Kit Lens 18-55mm; Canon 75-300 mm f/5.6; 2 batteries; 8 GB of CF cards; Canon 430 EX flash, diffuser, lens hoods, couple Uv filters
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2007 04:14 | #22 italianfemmy wrote in post #2657143 Jo.. I love them whatever they are but this is my personal taste. I think it would be boring without them. But, to each their own.  Thanks www.jolenestewartphotography.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Feb 05, 2007 05:07 | #23 Why are you putting something on the images? Take a look at my 20 second effort removing your watermark.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2007 05:27 | #24 tim wrote in post #2657234 Why are you putting something on the images? Take a look at my 20 second effort removing your watermark. Tim, it is not there to stop you "copying" the image - more a signature. If I were to upload for viewing on the web I would change the resolution. And - very clever cloning. www.jolenestewartphotography.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lin-z Goldmember  1,247 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: GA More info | Feb 05, 2007 05:29 | #25 I think they are nice, but the drop shadow on Photography, and Wedding photography, and the small wording undernear makes it kinda hard to read at a glance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Feb 05, 2007 05:31 | #26 _Jo_ wrote in post #2657294 Tim, it is not there to stop you "copying" the image - more a signature. If I were to upload for viewing on the web I would change the resolution. And - very clever cloning. Patch tool, 5 seconds... i've seen prints that my customers made from images this size. They're horrible prints, but they're happy with them, and don't even know they've done anything wrong. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2007 05:34 | #27 Lin-z wrote in post #2657302 I think they are nice, but the drop shadow on Photography, and Wedding photography, and the small wording undernear makes it kinda hard to read at a glance. I prefer the JS inside the cirlce as the logo, but I always like thinks inside a circle.. Thanks for your comments www.jolenestewartphotography.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberPet Hiding Under a Rock  4,052 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Piteå, Sweden More info | Feb 05, 2007 10:47 | #28 I think you need to find a better font... none of the samples you've given is "dead on". /Petra Hall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gateruner Senior Member  358 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Katy, Texas More info | Feb 05, 2007 11:15 | #29 I like #1 but i would place the little script above the name to the left of the name instead. That would be my choice. Scott { Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1722 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
