Can anyone enlighten me to the difference / advantages between HDR and simply applying different exposure compensations to a single RAW image and then applying maks to the relevant areas of the RAW image please
Taxboy Member 97 posts Likes: 14 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Feb 05, 2007 11:30 | #1 Can anyone enlighten me to the difference / advantages between HDR and simply applying different exposure compensations to a single RAW image and then applying maks to the relevant areas of the RAW image please
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrandonSi Nevermind.. I'm silly. More info | Feb 05, 2007 11:34 | #2 They're pretty much the same thing.. If I had to pick out a difference, I'd say HDR concentrates more on increasing the dynamic range of the shot as a whole, where as blending really utilizes the multiple exposures to bring out lost detail and portions of the shot that were not able to be captured due to the extreme range of lighting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Virtual_D Member 70 posts Joined Aug 2006 More info | Feb 05, 2007 11:36 | #3 Taxboy wrote in post #2658822 Can anyone enlighten me to the difference / advantages between HDR and simply applying different exposure compensations to a single RAW image and then applying maks to the relevant areas of the RAW image please The most obvious one is that HDR works with bracketed exposures. There is more dynamic range to work with from 3 or more exposures then with one exposure. Equipment:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcrebelxt Goldmember 3,016 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Feb 05, 2007 12:38 | #4 Virtual_D wrote in post #2658875 The most obvious one is that HDR works with bracketed exposures. There is more dynamic range to work with from 3 or more exposures then with one exposure. Agree with post above. David C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ebann Once an ugly duckling 3,396 posts Joined Jan 2003 Location: Chimping around Brazil since 1973! (Sometimes NYC) More info | HDR from multiple shots (i.e. bracketing) requires a scene with little to no movements. RAW doesn't have that restriction because it is a single shot. RAW is limited to the dynamic range of the camera sensor and of that specific exposure. HDR has no limit, i.e. you can keep on adding more and more exposures at different stops and merge it all together. It is common to merge between 3 to 8 exposures to form an HDR image. Ellery Bann
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krazziecliff Senior Member 761 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Dubai, Mumbai and Goa More info | Feb 05, 2007 12:46 | #6 HDR primarily increases the dynamic range, although in situations where multiple exposures are not possible due to subject motion the use of a single RAW is the only option with satisfactory results I must add.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for clarifying this so quickly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1148 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||