Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Feb 2007 (Monday) 11:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Difference btween HDR vs RAW Blending

 
Taxboy
Member
97 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2006
     
Feb 05, 2007 11:30 |  #1

Can anyone enlighten me to the difference / advantages between HDR and simply applying different exposure compensations to a single RAW image and then applying maks to the relevant areas of the RAW image please




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 05, 2007 11:34 |  #2

They're pretty much the same thing.. If I had to pick out a difference, I'd say HDR concentrates more on increasing the dynamic range of the shot as a whole, where as blending really utilizes the multiple exposures to bring out lost detail and portions of the shot that were not able to be captured due to the extreme range of lighting.


[ www (external link)ยท flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Virtual_D
Member
70 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Feb 05, 2007 11:36 |  #3

Taxboy wrote in post #2658822 (external link)
Can anyone enlighten me to the difference / advantages between HDR and simply applying different exposure compensations to a single RAW image and then applying maks to the relevant areas of the RAW image please

The most obvious one is that HDR works with bracketed exposures. There is more dynamic range to work with from 3 or more exposures then with one exposure.


Equipment:
Doesn't matter.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidcrebelxt
Goldmember
Avatar
3,016 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Missouri, USA
     
Feb 05, 2007 12:38 |  #4

Virtual_D wrote in post #2658875 (external link)
The most obvious one is that HDR works with bracketed exposures. There is more dynamic range to work with from 3 or more exposures then with one exposure.

Agree with post above.

Also, even though working in RAW, if you go too far increasing or decreasing exposure, you can introduce noise or other problems into image... even for a typical image, I try not to push it past 1 1/2 stops if I can help it.

But if there is motion in image (people or other objects) or you MUST shoot handheld, you don't have any other option, and single RAW is viable alternative... plus single RAW is great for getting the hang of it using photos you already have in you library!


David C.
Equipment: Canon Dig. Rebel XT; 18-55mm EF-S; 28-105mm EF; 50mm 1.8 EF
Sigma ef-500 DG ST, Elements, Gimp, Lightroom
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dcrebelxt (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ebann
Once an ugly duckling
Avatar
3,396 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Chimping around Brazil since 1973! (Sometimes NYC)
     
Feb 05, 2007 12:45 as a reply to  @ davidcrebelxt's post |  #5

HDR from multiple shots (i.e. bracketing) requires a scene with little to no movements. RAW doesn't have that restriction because it is a single shot. RAW is limited to the dynamic range of the camera sensor and of that specific exposure. HDR has no limit, i.e. you can keep on adding more and more exposures at different stops and merge it all together. It is common to merge between 3 to 8 exposures to form an HDR image.


Ellery Bann
Fuji X100
6D | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 50 1.4
1D Mk IV | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 135 2L | 400 5.6L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krazziecliff
Senior Member
761 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Dubai, Mumbai and Goa
     
Feb 05, 2007 12:46 |  #6

HDR primarily increases the dynamic range, although in situations where multiple exposures are not possible due to subject motion the use of a single RAW is the only option with satisfactory results I must add.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Taxboy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
97 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2006
     
Feb 05, 2007 13:31 as a reply to  @ krazziecliff's post |  #7

Thanks for clarifying this so quickly




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,312 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Difference btween HDR vs RAW Blending
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1148 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.