Could someone please tell me why a tripod mounting ring is advocated (and provision made) for the 70-200 f/4 and not the 70-300, as they are both virtually the same length and weight?
RoyMathers I am Spartacus!  43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Feb 08, 2007 13:41 | #1 Could someone please tell me why a tripod mounting ring is advocated (and provision made) for the 70-200 f/4 and not the 70-300, as they are both virtually the same length and weight?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop  6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | Feb 08, 2007 14:01 | #2 I'm only guessing, but perhaps it's because they expect the L lens is more likely to be used by more serious photographers? It can't be weight, as the L is only just heavier than the 70-300 (705g v 670g). Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1608 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
