these two items:
Sigma EF-500 DG ST EO-ETTL II Flash for Canon EOS
&
Sigma EF-500 ST EO for Canon
Jaime Goldmember 2,464 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 More info | Feb 11, 2007 23:14 | #1 these two items: "My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 11, 2007 23:28 | #2 Same thing. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember 4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Feb 12, 2007 07:07 | #3 Actually, they both are just as crappy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 12, 2007 08:24 | #4 jr_senator wrote in post #2694965 Actually, they both are just as crappy. To each his own, I suppose. The Sigma EF-500 DG ST is a fairly powerful unit with limited manual controls and lacks some features of the high end Canon Speedlites. But those features are only useful to some people. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOS_JD Goldmember 2,925 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland More info | Feb 12, 2007 08:25 | #5 The EF-500 DG Super is an excellent flash unit akin to the Canon 550EX. Not built as well and slightly clunky to use but an excellent flash with lots of features. Well worth the asking price if cash is tight. I still have one but rarely use it. the 580EX is my preferred option now. All My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Feb 12, 2007 08:30 | #6 EOS_JD wrote in post #2695212 The EF-500 DG Super is an excellent flash unit akin to the Canon 550EX. Not built as well and slightly clunky to use but an excellent flash with lots of features. Well worth the asking price if cash is tight. I still have one but rarely use it. the 580EX is my preferred option now. The Super, yeah. But the ST is pretty crippled, IMHO. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 12, 2007 11:57 | #7 I appreciate your answers guys, My exposure (no pun intended) to flashes is very limited to the built in on the 350 or to a 220 speedlight i have which limits me to straight on. For me money is always a concern and though I realize that some people say it is best to spend high money for the best my philosophy is to spend less initially until I am ready to move to the high end models. The reason I was asking is because I asked someone that is selling one of these and this was his response: "My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Feb 12, 2007 12:00 | #8 The Sigmas (both Super and baby brother ST) are compatible with E-TTL II. Either would work on your XT. It's only a matter of deciding which features you want and are willing to pay for, or whether you can live without them to save money. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 12, 2007 12:37 | #9 KonTiki wrote in post #2696314 Sigma EF-500 ST EO Flash for Canon Being an amateur photographer, I can't say with any precision whether or not it will work with your Rebel XT. What I can tell you is that the flash uses (is compatible with) TTL metering (i.e. not E-TTL or E-TTL II). Hang on a minute. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Feb 12, 2007 14:49 | #10 Curtis N wrote in post #2696490 Hang on a minute. I initially overlooked the fact that the letters "DG" are not in the model designation. If the seller says that it's not compatible with E-TTL or E-TTL II, it's probably an earlier version, made for film cameras. If there is no "DG" (designation for digital) in the model name, it won't work with your RebelXT or any other Canon Digital SLR. Sorry for the initial oversight. ![]() I was just about to point that out but it looks like you caught yourself and beat me to it. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Feb 12, 2007 14:52 | #11 Hmm. I didn't notice the lack of "DG" in the title either. Saw it in the first (longer one) and guess took it for granted that it'd be in the second as well. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 12, 2007 14:55 | #12 Wow, now I am real glad I asked. I almost bought it too. Thanks guys. "My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Feb 12, 2007 14:56 | #13 OEM is pricier but a lot less confusing. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 26, 2007 19:58 | #14 Well I passed on it and I know maybe this was not the best move in terms of features (as I said before this area is all new to me), but I bought instead from a member here a 430 EX that came today. I have played with it a bit obviously not knowing much about it but I am happy with it so far. "My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1612 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||