Well spotted! I thought it was pond weed, but what do I know. Are you an expert on goose droppings? ha ha
| HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html' |
Everybody has to be good at something...
spitfirejd Goldmember 1,524 posts Likes: 123 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Delaware. More info | Feb 13, 2007 14:00 | #31 Ukuleleman wrote in post #2701408 Well spotted! I thought it was pond weed, but what do I know. Are you an expert on goose droppings? ha ha
Everybody has to be good at something... Jeff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2007 14:23 | #32 |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Feb 13, 2007 15:05 | #33 Treat me like a tourist wrote in post #2703133 Tareq should you change your mind about your 70-200-2.8is let me know ![]() How is your 1d working out? i still havent purchased the 8mm sigma yet. Soon i will do tests, just be patient Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anthonyl Member 232 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Brisbane Australia More info | I am in a quandry as to whether to go with a 70-200 f/4 IS or a 70-200 f/2.8 NON IS.....HELP ME DECIDE NOW..I need to make up my mind in the next 30 minutes!!!!!! EOS 500D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2007 17:41 | #35 Easy. Get the f/4 IS. It's weather-sealed, weighs less [a plus for most people], has a fantastic image stabiliser, and has superior image quality. It will hold its resale value better, though I doubt many will get rid of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anthonyl Member 232 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Brisbane Australia More info | Feb 13, 2007 17:56 | #36 strat666 wrote in post #2704129 Easy. Get the f/4 IS. It's weather-sealed, weighs less [a plus for most people], has a fantastic image stabiliser, and has superior image quality. It will hold its resale value better, though I doubt many will get rid of it. Thats the one...Im off to the shop RIGHT NOW.....back in 30 minutes!! (Hopefully with an f/4 IS tucked under my arm)!!!! EOS 500D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Feb 13, 2007 18:15 | #37 The only reason I got the f/4 IS over the f/2.8 was the weight. But I'am highly pleased with the f/4 IS. The IQ is excellent and that 4-stop IS is immensely effective. I find myself constantly able to take blur-free shots at shutter speeds as low as 1/13th second at 200mm. Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2007 18:46 | #38 Tareq wrote in post #2703325 Soon i will do tests, just be patient you asked me about 1D? which one, 1DN or 1Ds2? Both are great and i kicked those 5D and 30D and xt in the bags, only showing 1-series the top of both worlds, one with white lens with red line on, and the other one with black glass with red line on. ![]() ![]() Such a show off now- Have you sold all but the 1's now? I am in the market for a 5d but i want to see what canon have planned this year, hopefully all will become clear soon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitaljoe Senior Member 345 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Cape Town South Africa More info | Feb 13, 2007 20:52 | #39 That new f4 70-200mm knocks spots off the 2.8mm. It is just so sharp with brilliant contrast. To my eyes that 2.8 is not the best at that aperture - I would not choose to use it at that f stop. Consider it was designed years ago and technology has improved radically. QC on the 2.8 also seems to be a problem.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anthonyl Member 232 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Brisbane Australia More info | Im back! 70-200 f/4 IS in hand........took a few shots and so far I am impressed. EOS 500D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Feb 13, 2007 21:56 | #41 anthonyl wrote in post #2705312 20-200 f/4 IS..is waaay better and sharper! A 10x zoom L with better IQ than the 70-300? Tell me the store now! Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Feb 14, 2007 00:21 | #42 just mistake in typing, its happen when someone so happy like a crazy. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anthonyl Member 232 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Brisbane Australia More info | Feb 14, 2007 07:02 | #43 Huh? EOS 500D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samnz Goldmember 1,315 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Blenheim, Marlborough More info | Feb 14, 2007 07:34 | #44 Buggaya Buggaya Buggaya!!! I can see another night in the dog box comin up cause I'm gonna trade up my F4L for the F4LIS. Thanks guys! (I think)??? SAM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Feb 14, 2007 07:58 | #45 anthonyl wrote in post #2706905 Huh? anthonyl wrote: 20-200 f/4 IS..is waaay better and sharper! Don't worry dude, I was just being a smartarse. Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1144 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||