I have the 17-55 F2.8 IS, and it is by far sharper than my previous 28-70 F2.8L lens.
| POLL: "Do you consider your IQ from your 17-55 2.8 IS is "L" quality?" |
 Yes I think the image quality is up to L standards, but not other things (weather seal, durability, ect.) | 39 81.3% |
| No L lens image quality is better. | 7 14.6% |
| I have noticed dust inside my lens and I see it in the picture. | 2 4.2% |
Toogy "I like pictures of myself!"  6,248 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Feb 13, 2007 07:48 | #31 I have the 17-55 F2.8 IS, and it is by far sharper than my previous 28-70 F2.8L lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrkgoo Goldmember 2,289 posts Joined Aug 2006 More info | For the record here are some 70-200/17-55 pics (I know I'm not pushing the limits of the lenses, but these are 'real world' pics, and the kinds of things I take). Unmodified:
ef70-200f4l, 70mm, f8.0, 1/200s, iso100
ef70-200f4l, 70mm, f11.0, 1/1250s, iso100
efs17-55IS2.8, 20mm, F11.0, 1/4000s, iso100
efs17-55IS2.8, 17mm, F8.0, 1/50s, iso100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1722 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
