Anyone here ever use a Kata H-14 bag?
If so, what could you fit in it, and how do/did you like it?
Thanks! 
SoundsGood Goldmember 1,968 posts Joined Nov 2006 More info | Feb 15, 2007 10:43 | #1 Anyone here ever use a Kata H-14 bag?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 13:53 | #2 Hmmm... not exactly as popular as the Crumplers, eh?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kster Senior Member 551 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: California, USA More info | Feb 15, 2007 15:54 | #3 I use one as my primary walkaround bag; usually carrying my 5D mounted with a 24-105 and my 220EX (fill) flash in the side pocket. The bag is very well built and does an excellent job of protects its contents. 1DmkIII and some lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 15:58 | #4 kster wrote in post #2714532 I use one as my primary walkaround bag; usually carrying my 5D mounted with a 24-105 and my 220EX (fill) flash in the side pocket. The bag is very well built and does an excellent job of protects its contents. Thanks! Do you know how a mounted 70-200 f/4 does in this bag?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kster Senior Member 551 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: California, USA More info | Feb 15, 2007 16:05 | #5 I don't have the 70-200 f4 but I doubt it would fit mounted on a 5D. I know the 70-200f2.8 IS has no chance of fitting with a 5D. 1DmkIII and some lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 16:15 | #6 kster wrote in post #2714579 I don't have the 70-200 f4 but I doubt it would fit mounted on a 5D. Sorry, this would be on a 30D, not a 5D. kster wrote in post #2714579 there isn't a "rain cover pocket". Bummer. I was hoping it would have one (similar to the Lowepro).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Feb 15, 2007 16:20 | #7 I can fit a 5D and 70-200 2.8L IS (hood reversed) in the H-14. Snug fit, but it works. 30D and 70-200 f/4 would fit just fine. My favorite combination, the 5D and 24-70L, fits with a bit of room to spare. The 24-70L with hood in shooting position is at least as big as the 70-200 f/4L. On top of that, I can fit a 580 in one side pocket, and a 100 macro or smaller in the other. The nice thing, however, is that those side pockets don't stick out if you don't have anything in them, giving it a rather low profile. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kster Senior Member 551 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: California, USA More info | Feb 15, 2007 16:24 | #8 Interesting. I do have a tripod L bracket mounted on my 5D so I wonder if this is preventing me from fitting the 70-200f2.8 IS. But then again, I haven't tried really forcing it yet either. 1DmkIII and some lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 16:26 | #9 Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2714648 30D and 70-200 f/4 would fit just fine. Excellent! Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2714648 It does come with a rain cover/heat shield. Just stretches over the bag and tightens with a drawstring. Where in the bag do you keep this cover?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 16:28 | #10 Oh, one other thing:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 15, 2007 16:28 | #11 I've had the H-14 for a little over year now, and it's the bag that I use most. By the way I use this in combination with the Kata S-308 for greater comfort and additional storage rooms. Both look like one unit and VERY stylish.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Feb 15, 2007 18:16 | #12 SoundsGood wrote in post #2714685 Excellent! Question: if the 30D / 70-200 f/4 combo is in the middle with a reversed hood, would there be room on the sides for a 17-55 lens (in one side slot) and an external flash (on the other side slot)? Plenty of room for the flash, and being that the 70-200 f/4 is noticeably smaller than the 2.8 IS, I'd say the lens would fit, too, since my 100 macro fits with my 2.8 IS. Where in the bag do you keep this cover? Thanks in advance... There's a place on the bag, much like the lowepros. However, I usually just cram it either in the bottom of a side pocket, or in the little "extra" pocket in the front of the main compartment. Or, you can put it in the tight plastic-y section that's on the inside of the top flap. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 18:31 | #13 Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2715211 Plenty of room for the flash, and being that the 70-200 f/4 is noticeably smaller than the 2.8 IS, I'd say the lens would fit, too, since my 100 macro fits with my 2.8 IS. There's a place on the bag, much like the lowepros. However, I usually just cram it either in the bottom of a side pocket, or in the little "extra" pocket in the front of the main compartment. Or, you can put it in the tight plastic-y section that's on the inside of the top flap. Very cool. Thank you!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Feb 15, 2007 19:16 | #14 Nah, don't like the Crumplers. Not enough protection for me, and a bit too "fluffy". I like utilitarian design, like the Katas. Extreme protection, style also, in a sensible design. The Crumplers always seemed, imo, to be a bit short on the sensibility, and a bit too thin, literally, to protect my huge investment. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 15, 2007 20:04 | #15 Thanks again. I think Kata's the one for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2799 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||