5D for me also, FF, 12-Mp, Better battery life, newer design.
Newer by a couple of months... but thats it.
| POLL: "Which would you rather own?" |
5D | 70 44% |
1D MK IIN | 89 56% |
Photolistic Goldmember 1,632 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Oregon City, Oregon More info | Feb 18, 2007 00:11 | #31 Permanent banJanika wrote in post #2724149 5D for me also, FF, 12-Mp, Better battery life, newer design. Newer by a couple of months... but thats it. FOR SALE: Canon 30D, 10D, and D2000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 18, 2007 00:19 | #32 In my honest opinion, I would get the 5D for the FF. I know the 5D doesn't have speed but, the 30D will do the job for sports,events,etc. I just got my 5d and I'm in love. If you really want the speed and don't mind the 1.3 crop on the Mark II N than go for it. The Mark II N is not in my needs for what I do since, I do mostly landscape,portraiture and these 2 bodies I own currently fit the bill in my book.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanGSR Member 185 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: New York More info | Feb 18, 2007 00:23 | #33 5D: Canon 1D Mark II | Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L| Canon 50 f/1.4 USM | Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L USM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I have been considering the mkII myself,but I am going to wait a few months to see if Canon drops something new to replace it.I heard from a guy who lectures at our school that a 1ds replacement is on the way,so a mkII should be too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Choderboy I like a long knob More info | 2 30Ds and a 20D should sell for close to the cost of a 5D, so the "BOTH" option does not seem out of reach if you are allready considering an extra body. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LaniKai "blissfully unaware" 2,136 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Connecticut More info | Feb 18, 2007 01:03 | #36 The way I see it, a 5D with a 24-105L would be a nice, lightweight travel camera. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samnz Goldmember 1,315 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Blenheim, Marlborough More info | Feb 18, 2007 02:24 | #37 One dee mark two en "cause it rolls off the tongue" better than "five dee". SAM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tag141 Goldmember 3,247 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Trans Trans Tasman? More info | Feb 18, 2007 02:39 | #38 1D2N, only because I have one. Don't want to pick up a 5D as I might like it too much.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samnz Goldmember 1,315 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Blenheim, Marlborough More info | Feb 18, 2007 02:48 | #39 Will check it out tomorrow. Have to go to bed SAM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Feb 18, 2007 02:50 | #40 Too bad you couldn't make the poll so that 5D and II N owners couldn't vote. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zacker Cream of the Crop 6,006 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Oxford, CT. More info | Feb 18, 2007 05:22 | #41 why is the 5 d Not faster? sensor size??? for me, thats the deal breaker and I dont really use it on my 30D but its a great feature to have because the few times i did use it, it was awesome!!! id love to get a 5D though, i have seen some high ISO shots that were just amazing, plus I do alot with my 17-40L and it just cranks on a FF. http://www.theanimalhaven.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackshadow Mr T. from the A team 5,732 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Melbourne, VIC Australia More info | Feb 18, 2007 06:02 | #42 |
PhilLight "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate" 2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Feb 18, 2007 07:06 | #43 joegolf68 wrote in post #2728391 ...Althoguh the more I read about the 5D from owners here, the more appealing it appears. zacker wrote in post #2728604 ... id love to get a 5D though, i have seen some high ISO shots that were just amazing, plus I do alot with my 17-40L and it just cranks on a FF. When I was debating this in my mind, I really agonized over which model to get. The factors that tipped the scale for me were things like, 1) the rebate made the 5D a much better value than the 1D MkIIN, and 2) although the 8.5 fps would be nice on rare occasions, the FF sensor is nice on every single shot I take. As KevC stated, most of the time at that speed all you get is a card full of the same shot. I have no doubt that the 1D MkIIN is a nice camera, I would love to have one, but the advantages of the MkIIN just didn't justify the additional expense for me. I don't think I've seen anyone who bought the 5D say they wish they hadn't. Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2007 09:59 | #44 thekid24 wrote in post #2727720 Im not sure if I have or someone else has asked but what sport(s) do you shoot? Because if you shoot just one sport then youll know that the season is only so long. Sports are seasonal, portraits, events, and weddings (not as much, often taken when the weather is very nice) can be shot year round. I shoot: Don Martelli
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Well if you shoot mainly sports then you need to get the 1dm2n.The crop factor helps in that case and the speed is important,as is the af.I just really like the pro style body of the 1d,by the time you get the grip for the 5d you will have spent the same.Plus you can shoot raw to one card and jpeg to the other,thats a big plus to me.The 1d is almost 3 times as fast (8.5fps to 3fps) as the 5 too,thats a lot of missed shots when shooting action.Plus the 1d has a 200,000 rated shutter whereas the 5 only has 100,00,you may never use it that much but it just shows that one is indeed a "pro" body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1722 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||