Is it normal that if I take two pictures of the same thing, with flash or not, one at F4 and one at F2.8, that the F2.8 shot is always slightly less exposed/darker (i'm guessing 1/3 stop) than the F4 shot?
fredmitcham Member 219 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:04 | #1 Permanent banIs it normal that if I take two pictures of the same thing, with flash or not, one at F4 and one at F2.8, that the F2.8 shot is always slightly less exposed/darker (i'm guessing 1/3 stop) than the F4 shot?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Heatseeker99 Senior Member 591 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Ohio More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:18 | #2 What mode are you shooting in? Manual, AV, Tv? Is this a controlled setup with a tripod shooting the same subject, at the same focal length? AWB? A.J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:46 | #3 If all settings, environmentally and the camera settings (i.e. manual mode), are the same, and the only thing that changes is the aperture between the two shots, then the 2.8 should be brighter. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:47 | #4 if you are in full manual, with the same shutter speed, and ISO, then the larger aperture can only make the image brighter. Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:51 | #5 Billginthekeys wrote in post #2748831 if you are in full manual, with the same shutter speed, and ISO, then the larger aperture can only make the image brighter. As above. If that's not the case, then your computer is not consistenly processing your photos. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ijohnson Goldmember 1,646 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Whiteriver, AZ More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:54 | #6 I will assume you are shooting in Av mode. www.trickoflight.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend. 66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Feb 21, 2007 12:56 | #7 This is a case where some example photos would be most beneficial. Show us what you have...with exif data intact. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andy_T Compensating for his small ... sensor 9,860 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Hannover Germany More info | Feb 21, 2007 13:00 | #8 The question here is ... are the images really always darker on the f/2.8 than on the f/4? some cameras, some lenses,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2007 13:27 | #9 Permanent banI shoot in Av. If the camera is supposed to give an identical shot at F2.8 1/50 and F4 1/25 then mine is not, lens is a 17-55. The F2.8 shots often come out slightly darker, it may not be 1/3 of a stop but the difference is noticable (although somewhat negligible at the same time). When using my 430ex in Av with 1/250 sync the difference is noticable in a different way (they're illuminated a bit different) but I guess thats unavoidable as at F4 (compared to F2.8 ) the flash has to fire brighter so you get slightly more flash lighting/glare/reflections/shadows and less ambient lighting. Correct?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bieber Goldmember 1,992 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Bradenton, FL More info | Feb 21, 2007 14:14 | #10 The ambient light exposure will be the same either way, but it's possible the flash metering changed slightly. EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2007 14:36 | #11 Permanent banbieber wrote in post #2749194 The ambient light exposure will be the same either way, but it's possible the flash metering changed slightly. Right but what I mean is the flash will have to fire stronger at F4 to get the same exposure as it did at F2.8, so there's more flash light bouncing around which can change the look of the picture, correct?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2007 16:18 | #12 Would your 17-55 lens focal length setting (for the f:2.8 shots) happen to be towards the 55mm range? Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2007 16:49 | #13 Permanent banChigger wrote in post #2749800 Would your 17-55 lens focal length setting (for the f:2.8 shots) happen to be towards the 55mm range? yes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2007 17:12 | #14 For some reason, I read 17-55 & my mind said 18-55. I assumed the kit lens with it's variable max f:stop. My mistake. Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RgB Goldmember 1,323 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Feb 21, 2007 18:07 | #15 I did a lens test at different apertures in AV. Each setting from 2.8 up got darker. I used a tripod and shot the in quick succession. Daniel Speranza
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1613 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||