Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Feb 2007 (Wednesday) 12:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

F4 shots brighter than F2.8?

 
fredmitcham
Member
219 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:04 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Is it normal that if I take two pictures of the same thing, with flash or not, one at F4 and one at F2.8, that the F2.8 shot is always slightly less exposed/darker (i'm guessing 1/3 stop) than the F4 shot?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Heatseeker99
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:18 |  #2

What mode are you shooting in? Manual, AV, Tv? Is this a controlled setup with a tripod shooting the same subject, at the same focal length? AWB?

This will help. But in general, no, it shouldn't be any darker.


A.J.

1D mkIII \ 24-105L \70-200 2.8IS II \ 35L \ 85 1.8 \ Kenko 1.4x \ 580EXII \ 430EX + every piece of Nikon/Photogenic equipment imaginable at the studio.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:46 |  #3

If all settings, environmentally and the camera settings (i.e. manual mode), are the same, and the only thing that changes is the aperture between the two shots, then the 2.8 should be brighter.

Could you post the two pics using "Go Advanced" and/or post the exif data so we can compare?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:47 |  #4

if you are in full manual, with the same shutter speed, and ISO, then the larger aperture can only make the image brighter.


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:51 |  #5

Billginthekeys wrote in post #2748831 (external link)
if you are in full manual, with the same shutter speed, and ISO, then the larger aperture can only make the image brighter.

As above. If that's not the case, then your computer is not consistenly processing your photos.


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Whiteriver, AZ
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:54 |  #6

I will assume you are shooting in Av mode.

Are you sure its not a metering issue? If you are not on a tripod with a subject that isn't moving, the metering would easily change.

Even the tiniest shift could make the light meter change by 1/3 stop.

Also, as discussed with certain lenses, the vignetting at 2.8 could be allowing less light in. This has been noticed with lenses like the 50 1.4 and 50 1.2 where one is brighter (1.2) at the same f/stop.


www.trickoflight.net (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345 (external link)
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Feb 21, 2007 12:56 |  #7

This is a case where some example photos would be most beneficial. Show us what you have...with exif data intact.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Feb 21, 2007 13:00 |  #8

The question here is ... are the images really always darker on the f/2.8 than on the f/4?

Or did you see that in some cases the f/2.8 images were darker than the f/4 images. As already mentioned, a tiny difference in the light can change metering ... and if your camera did select a longer shutter speed in some cases than in others, it might explain it.

If you get these results consistantly, then something might be amiss with your camera/metering system/lens/...

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fredmitcham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
219 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Feb 21, 2007 13:27 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

I shoot in Av. If the camera is supposed to give an identical shot at F2.8 1/50 and F4 1/25 then mine is not, lens is a 17-55. The F2.8 shots often come out slightly darker, it may not be 1/3 of a stop but the difference is noticable (although somewhat negligible at the same time). When using my 430ex in Av with 1/250 sync the difference is noticable in a different way (they're illuminated a bit different) but I guess thats unavoidable as at F4 (compared to F2.8 ) the flash has to fire brighter so you get slightly more flash lighting/glare/reflect​ions/shadows and less ambient lighting. Correct?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bieber
Goldmember
Avatar
1,992 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
Feb 21, 2007 14:14 |  #10

The ambient light exposure will be the same either way, but it's possible the flash metering changed slightly.


EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
Nifty fifty, EF 28mm f/2.8, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Speedlights SB-25/SB-26/580EX, Pocket Wizards and such
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fredmitcham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
219 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Feb 21, 2007 14:36 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

bieber wrote in post #2749194 (external link)
The ambient light exposure will be the same either way, but it's possible the flash metering changed slightly.

Right but what I mean is the flash will have to fire stronger at F4 to get the same exposure as it did at F2.8, so there's more flash light bouncing around which can change the look of the picture, correct?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tixeon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,251 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2004
Location: 44644
     
Feb 21, 2007 16:18 |  #12

Would your 17-55 lens focal length setting (for the f:2.8 shots) happen to be towards the 55mm range?


Tim
______
Any cat owner will tell you -- no one really owns a cat...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fredmitcham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
219 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Feb 21, 2007 16:49 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

Chigger wrote in post #2749800 (external link)
Would your 17-55 lens focal length setting (for the f:2.8 shots) happen to be towards the 55mm range?

yes




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tixeon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,251 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2004
Location: 44644
     
Feb 21, 2007 17:12 |  #14

For some reason, I read 17-55 & my mind said 18-55. I assumed the kit lens with it's variable max f:stop. My mistake.


Tim
______
Any cat owner will tell you -- no one really owns a cat...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RgB
Goldmember
Avatar
1,323 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 21, 2007 18:07 |  #15

I did a lens test at different apertures in AV. Each setting from 2.8 up got darker. I used a tripod and shot the in quick succession.

In AV 2.8 should be the brightest.


Daniel Speranza
30D - 580EX II
Lee ND Grad Filters---77mmWide Angle Adapter
10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM --- 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Website (external link) * Flickr (external link) * Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,850 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
F4 shots brighter than F2.8?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1613 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.