dirt lover wrote in post #2770122
Why did they not let you in? I don't get it.
I suppose one of two reasons could be behind the tightened restrictions:
1. When used in the normal seating areas, large lenses might pose a nuisance or safety issue for the people sitting in front of you.
2. Very large lenses could be used to carry significant amounts of explosive material; it's the Cav's job to provide as secure environment as possible.
As I indicated in the OP, I had attended Cavs games in the past and used my 70-300 lens - certainly there was enough room in the seating area. Interference with the row in front was never even a question. Even then, why deny my stubby little 17-55?
The security concern could be a more valid issue. Other venues have simply asked me to take the lens cap off so they could peer inside. I offered this action to the entrance supervisor, but he declined, saying it was a size thing. When I get my response from the Cavs management, I'll suggest this as an alternative to a total ban, assuming security is the reason they provide.
I'm not whining about this nor did I make a scene at the security entrance. The supervisor was just doing his job enforcing what he believed to be management's policies. I am, though, concerned about this becoming a trend at all sporting events. I hope not!
Somewhat interesting side note: I'm responsible for a business providing security systems to large global customers, so I know a thing or two about security. I'll bet the true answer is they are balancing:
1. risk of danger to patrons (explosives)
2. entrance throughput (good inspections take time)
3. employee skills (knowing what to look for when peering into a lens)
4. brand protection (what if something DID happen - attendance drops to zero)
5. Customer satisfaction / enjoyment
In today's world, the priorities are as listed.