Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 01 Mar 2007 (Thursday) 11:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

need help re: measuring watt per sec

 
clengster_77
Senior Member
Avatar
613 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Philippines
     
Mar 01, 2007 11:02 |  #1

is there a way to measure the watt per second in a studio flash? i'm planning to purchase a studio light but i want to know first if they are really the same watt per second as they claim their product to be. i have a sekonik l308s ( if this could help in my question) thanks in advance!

best regards
cleng


Canon 5D x 2
16 - 35L mk1 + 85 1.2L FD + 70 - 200 2.8L
50 1.4 + 85 1.8 + 580 EX + 420 EX + 055ProB + 488Rc2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Mar 01, 2007 11:28 |  #2

First off, it's not watts per second, it's watt-seconds, which is the same as a Joule.

Typically, this is a measurement of how much energy can be stored in the capacitor and released to light the bulb (ignore the "effective watt-seconds" ratings of some manufacturers).

It is not possible to back-calculate this measurement by measuring light at a specific distance. Small differences in reflectors, as well as other factors, will change this dramatically.

Take a look at the specifications page on the AlienBees website (external link). Scroll down to the output measurements and notice how different the guide numbers are with different reflectors. There is about a 2 stop difference between the 7 inch and 11 inch reflectors.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 01, 2007 11:53 |  #3

Look at the electrical specs, and you will notices comments like

"320 true Ws, 800 effective Ws, " That tells you that the capacitor holds as much electrical energy as another manufacturer's 320 w-s unit. Period. It also lets you know that they CLAIM to output as much light as someone else's 800 w-s unit. Marketing hype.

Now let me reveal how unbelievable the marketing claims can be!...
A decade ago, at a tradeshow, a XYZ 750 was tested against a Photogenic Powerlight 750. The XYZ 750 claimed '750 effective w-s', that it was as powerful as 750 w-s unit, even though the XYZ 750 capacitor was rated smaller. In the test, the Photogenic consistently outperformed, and provided about 1EV more light than the XYZ 750. For all tests, even bare tube with the reflectors removed entirely!
So in that series of tests the XYZ 750 was "1/2 as powerful as the Powerlight 750"...so much for claims that XYZ 750 is as powerful as another manufacturer's 750 w-s unit!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Mar 01, 2007 13:39 |  #4

wont the guide No tell you what you want to know the larger the Guide No the more power the unit has.
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 01, 2007 13:54 |  #5

Manufacturers of studio strobes just about never list Guide Number. The GN would be dependent upon which reflector is mounted, truly professional units very often have choice of reflector size and coverage area and even surface reflectivity and color. They are not light consumer speedlights.

Plus the OP wanted a way to test their truthfulness..and GN are often exaggerated, too!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Mar 01, 2007 14:21 |  #6

GyRob wrote in post #2796748 (external link)
wont the guide No tell you what you want to know the larger the Guide No the more power the unit has.

Rob, go to this page (external link) and lookup the specs of the 580EX, just as an example. Look at how much the GN changes at different zoom settings. The same thing happens when you mount different reflectors on a studio light. Changing the way the light is distributed changes the effective distance. This is why you don't see GN specifications on studio units, and why it's difficult to compare them with a flash meter unless they have identical reflectors.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlashZebra
This space available
Avatar
4,427 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Northern Kentucky
     
Mar 01, 2007 15:20 |  #7

With all it's faults, the best way to compare flash power from unit to unit, without accomplishing your own side by side shootout, is with the "true" Watt-second rating.

This is valid if :

  • You are comparing "true" Watt-second ratings from reputable manufactures of flash gear. If the rating seems high, then it it most likely is an inflated one. I have personally found that comparing the "true" Watt-second ratings on Speedotron, Novatron, Photogenic, Alien Bee "true" ratings (not those inflated "effective" units), Norman, Calumet, etc. is reasonable if not absolutely perfect way to compare available flash power.

  • You must totally dismiss any Watt-second rating that is not a "true" rating, like "effective" Watt- seconds or other such marketing hype.

* A "true" Watt-second rating is one that measures the amount of energy (in Watt-seconds - or Joules) that the unit's capacitors store.

Enjoy! Lon

*
http://flashzebra.com/ (external link)
*

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Mar 01, 2007 17:23 |  #8

The Chimera soft box company used to publish a product catalog. In it was a chart which compared the output of many strobe units in the same Chimera box. It was the most useful comparison of output I know of. You might still be able to get one from Chimera




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clengster_77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
613 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Philippines
     
Mar 01, 2007 18:28 |  #9

thanks for all your inputs guys!


Canon 5D x 2
16 - 35L mk1 + 85 1.2L FD + 70 - 200 2.8L
50 1.4 + 85 1.8 + 580 EX + 420 EX + 055ProB + 488Rc2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,775 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
need help re: measuring watt per sec
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1612 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.