Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 04 Mar 2007 (Sunday) 18:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

900 ti vs 850 is ; is the image stabilizer worth it?

 
kazino21
Member
140 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 04, 2007 18:53 |  #1

Hi guys I am trying to decide between the two it appears the lens on the 850 is superior it has a wider angle, has more telephoto and has an image stabilizer. I have seen the review of the 900 ti - http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canonsd900/p​age10.asp (external link)

and they do a direct comparison of the shots taken with the 850 and the 900 and the 900 always kills it in terms of resolution but do I really need all that resolution and would I be better off with the image stabilization that comes with the 800 and the wider angle lens?

Thanks in advance
Karim


Canon 6D - Canon 24-105L, Canon 70-200 f2.8 is, Sigma 12-24mm, Sigma 105mm macro, , Canon 50 f/1.8, Canon Speedlite 420ex, Kenko 1.4x & 2xteleconverter, Kenko extension tubes, Joby Gorillapod SLR Zoom.
Giottos CF tripod with Giottos Ballhead; Kata 3n1 30
Lightroom, Photoshop, Photomatrix

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kazino21
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
140 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 04, 2007 19:25 |  #2

Sorry mate I'm not clued up on what you mean by that, is that something to do with generations of the CCD one being better than the other? what are S1, S2, S3?


Canon 6D - Canon 24-105L, Canon 70-200 f2.8 is, Sigma 12-24mm, Sigma 105mm macro, , Canon 50 f/1.8, Canon Speedlite 420ex, Kenko 1.4x & 2xteleconverter, Kenko extension tubes, Joby Gorillapod SLR Zoom.
Giottos CF tripod with Giottos Ballhead; Kata 3n1 30
Lightroom, Photoshop, Photomatrix

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Mar 04, 2007 20:21 |  #3

kazino21 wrote in post #2815299 (external link)
Sorry mate I'm not clued up on what you mean by that, is that something to do with generations of the CCD one being better than the other? what are S1, S2, S3?

Sorry, I posted in the wrong thread. I have deleted the post.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saudidave
Senior Member
415 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Poynton, Cheshire, UK
     
Mar 05, 2007 03:51 |  #4

IS & wide angle every time, assumung that IQ's are the same.


Panasonic TZ5 ;Canon IXUS 850; (Canon 400D, 17-85IS; 75-300; bag; filters and all that stuff given to my very clever daughter for passing her exams!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kazino21
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
140 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 05, 2007 05:40 |  #5

I've also now seen the Panasonic lumix with 28 mm wideangle aswell with a Leica lens - Panasonic Lumix DMC - LX2

What do you guys think of this in comparison to the canon 850 is, which only has 7 megapixels over teh panasonics 10.


Canon 6D - Canon 24-105L, Canon 70-200 f2.8 is, Sigma 12-24mm, Sigma 105mm macro, , Canon 50 f/1.8, Canon Speedlite 420ex, Kenko 1.4x & 2xteleconverter, Kenko extension tubes, Joby Gorillapod SLR Zoom.
Giottos CF tripod with Giottos Ballhead; Kata 3n1 30
Lightroom, Photoshop, Photomatrix

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saudidave
Senior Member
415 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Poynton, Cheshire, UK
     
Mar 05, 2007 16:29 |  #6

kazino21 wrote in post #2817769 (external link)
I've also now seen the Panasonic lumix with 28 mm wideangle aswell with a Leica lens - Panasonic Lumix DMC - LX2

What do you guys think of this in comparison to the canon 850 is, which only has 7 megapixels over teh panasonics 10.

I won't do chapter & verse on the megapixel myth, but 10 isn't better than 7, probably worse; more noise.


Panasonic TZ5 ;Canon IXUS 850; (Canon 400D, 17-85IS; 75-300; bag; filters and all that stuff given to my very clever daughter for passing her exams!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,345 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
900 ti vs 850 is ; is the image stabilizer worth it?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2252 guests, 93 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.