Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 07 Mar 2007 (Wednesday) 01:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Spider Net

 
captain_70
Member
40 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
     
Mar 07, 2007 01:52 |  #1

Hello everybodyFor weeds I am trying to photograph a spider web, Finaly and hardly, i find one, but I find it prtty hard to take a picture to the web, it's invisible to my digital camera ( Canon PowerShot A 350 ) ,somebody help me to find out how can I make it and get a spider web image my self.Thank you


Captain_70
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/captain_70 (external link)
http://www.panoramio.c​om/user/434158 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ S.
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Canada's Capital
     
Mar 07, 2007 08:47 |  #2

A spider web is pretty much invisible to the autofocus beam of a point and shoot camera. The web is so thin that the focus beam will just go right through it. One way to capture a web is to either use manual focus (and focus bracketing to help if you are off by a bit) of by placing your hand directly behind the web, focusing on your hand, then moving your hand and the camera should be focused on the web. If you have control of it, use a larger aperture so that you have a larger depth of field and the web wont be outside that and blurry.

I hope I make sense. Good Luck


...Thomas

Canon 40D w/ EF-S 17-85IS USM | 50 1.4 | 70-200 f4L | 580EX II
Olympus OM1 (1970)
Praktica FX3 (1957) w/ Westanar 2.8/50 & Takumar 4/50 (I miss you grandpa)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Mar 07, 2007 09:19 as a reply to  @ Thomas S.'s post |  #3

What would really be nice, is to simply have a spider on the web, then focus or "spot' focus on the spider. Then you got-er! Umm, maybe I will see if I can find one of those little critters myself. I just hope that one of these Florida spiders don't eat my camera! :lol:


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 07, 2007 17:32 |  #4

Thomas S. wrote in post #2830710 (external link)
A spider web is pretty much invisible to the autofocus beam of a point and shoot camera. The web is so thin that the focus beam will just go right through it. One way to capture a web is to either use manual focus (and focus bracketing to help if you are off by a bit) of by placing your hand directly behind the web, focusing on your hand, then moving your hand and the camera should be focused on the web. If you have control of it, use a larger aperture so that you have a larger depth of field and the web wont be outside that and blurry.

I hope I make sense. Good Luck

Actually you want a smaller aperture - the bigger numbers represent a smaller opening in the lens. So use as small an aperture (large an f/stop number) as you can.

If you can catch the web early in the morning, while it's got dew on it sparkling in the sun it'll show up better in your photos too. Some people mist webs to simulate this effect.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
greygoose
Senior Member
437 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: New York aka Noo Yawk
     
Mar 07, 2007 21:24 |  #5

Thomas S. wrote in post #2830710 (external link)
A spider web is pretty much invisible to the autofocus beam of a point and shoot camera. The web is so thin that the focus beam will just go right through it. One way to capture a web is to either use manual focus (and focus bracketing to help if you are off by a bit) of by placing your hand directly behind the web, focusing on your hand, then moving your hand and the camera should be focused on the web. If you have control of it, use a larger aperture so that you have a larger depth of field and the web wont be outside that and blurry.

I hope I make sense. Good Luck

manual focus like it has been stated. then set the distance (move the bar) to 4" or 6" or whatever distance it would take to get it in focus. im assuming the a350 should have manual focus


Canon 1D Mark IIn, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.4, 70-200mm f/4, 580ex, 580ex II, 580ex II, vivitar 285, tripod, android

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ S.
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Canada's Capital
     
Mar 08, 2007 19:00 |  #6

Jon wrote in post #2833045 (external link)
Actually you want a smaller aperture - the bigger numbers represent a smaller opening in the lens. So use as small an aperture (large an f/stop number) as you can.

Yeah, thats what I meant. What he said. In my head I still dont have the whole larger number/ smaller aperture thing down. It comes out confusing to me then I 'try' and fix it. Damn brain.


...Thomas

Canon 40D w/ EF-S 17-85IS USM | 50 1.4 | 70-200 f4L | 580EX II
Olympus OM1 (1970)
Praktica FX3 (1957) w/ Westanar 2.8/50 & Takumar 4/50 (I miss you grandpa)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 09, 2007 08:29 |  #7

The way to remember is that the aperture at f/8 is 1/8 the focal length. At f/4 it's 1/4 the focal length. And 1/4 is bigger than 1/8 so f/4 is bigger than f/8.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
captain_70
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
40 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
     
Mar 11, 2007 07:30 |  #8

Fellows, thank you so much,
All of you try hard enough to help me, and I think i get the point, the problem is my digital camera, Canon PowerShot A350, it's not good enough for this stuff, by the way i get a new spider web, I think it's my lucky week, and I check the best time to photo it, it was the end of the day, that is means now dew drops and this is bad :((


Captain_70
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/captain_70 (external link)
http://www.panoramio.c​om/user/434158 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Mar 11, 2007 07:55 as a reply to  @ captain_70's post |  #9

I was not familiar with your Canon 350, and I just looked up the specs. I see it's from 1996. In the world of digital cameras, I'm afraid that's a real dinosaur. I still don't know that it wont take a picture of your spider web, but I doubt that it would do a good job. The good part is, you can buy a compact digital now for much less than your 350 was, and it will take a fantastic picture of your spider web, and many other things.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrysalis
Senior Member
317 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Sudbury, Canada
     
Mar 11, 2007 10:06 |  #10

both of these were taken with manual focus .....

IMAGE: http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g150/chrysalis1/August06Photobucket.jpg


IMAGE: http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g150/chrysalis1/August06009.jpg

marc
S3IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheresaH
Member
40 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: maple ridge, bc
     
Mar 11, 2007 11:47 |  #11

those are extremely large spider webs i dont think i have ever seen them so big before!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
captain_70
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
40 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
     
Mar 12, 2007 02:38 |  #12

well, I agree with TheresaH, they pretty big spider net, and they are awsum, good job.


Captain_70
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/captain_70 (external link)
http://www.panoramio.c​om/user/434158 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Mar 12, 2007 07:45 as a reply to  @ captain_70's post |  #13

Nice shots, though I would liked to have seen a more shallow depth of field. However, I realize that's not always easy with the compacts. Be that as it may, they are still great shots.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,756 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Spider Net
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2252 guests, 93 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.