AB has two different wireless remotes which one should I get for using 3-4 lights. I will be in indoor & outdoor rodeo arenas possably with other photographers using flashes & strobes.
HammerCope Senior Member 803 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Nebraska More info | Mar 07, 2007 14:43 | #1 AB has two different wireless remotes which one should I get for using 3-4 lights. I will be in indoor & outdoor rodeo arenas possably with other photographers using flashes & strobes. Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kuanyu Senior Member 575 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fl. USA More info | Mar 07, 2007 16:51 | #2 The differance ( Other than price) is that the more expensive one allows you to adjust the speedlights from the 'master controler'. I recently purchased the RFT1TX/RFT1RX set and am quite happy with it. It requires a walk to the lights anytime I want to change their levels/settings but it's a small area I shot in and I need the exersice 50D & XTi w/Grip - Kit 18-55mm,75-300mm,EF 24-85 IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 macro, 100-400L,580ex,RC-1,(2) AB400s, RF602s ,SoftBox/Barndoors/Brolly Box/Sekonic L-308S Lightmeter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlashZebra This space available 4,427 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Northern Kentucky More info | Mar 07, 2007 17:07 | #3 The stickies at the top of the forum contains a nice review by Robert on one of these units. Always check the stickies.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 07, 2007 20:03 | #4 Well I talked to AB earlier. they told me if I was shooting more than 80 ft from the strobes to buy a pocket wizard remote. Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RSN Member 60 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Springdale Arkansas More info | I use the cheaper AB remotes in High school gyms all the time and have no problem with them sometimes I am a ways away from them too and still no problem. If I had it to do over again I would get the cheaper ones. One thing of intrest when I talked to them at AB they told me there is alot of problem with interference with the expensive ones. Hope this helps Equipment list:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Longwatcher obsolete as of this post 3,914 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2002 Location: Newport News, VA, USA More info | I have the more expensive Radio Remote One set (two of them actually now) "Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 08, 2007 09:28 | #7 I think I might buy the cheeper remote to begin with then save for the pocket wizard plus II or what ever AB comes up with. Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Mar 08, 2007 10:39 | #8 HammerCope wrote in post #2836694 I think I might buy the cheeper remote to begin with then save for the pocket wizard plus II or what ever AB comes up with. Aren't we talking about 2 different types of 'remotes' in this thread? Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 08, 2007 11:52 | #9 No I dont care about ajusting the levels from the camera. AB told me that if I needed a range of more than 70-80 ft too go with the pocket wizard Plus II. Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Hi HammerCope, Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Longwatcher obsolete as of this post 3,914 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2002 Location: Newport News, VA, USA More info | To be specific and for trivia, both AB and myself call the cheap ones "Radio Triggers" and the pricey ones "Radio Remotes" or "Radio Remote Controls" "Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1706 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||