Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Mar 2007 (Wednesday) 20:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EOS 5D + studio lighting - strong red bias on skin tones

 
photocat_uk
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
     
Mar 07, 2007 20:37 |  #1

After many years of owning various Canon prosumer digital SLR (D30, D60, 10D and 20D), I have recently upgraded to Canon EOS 5D. The new camera works perfectly, however my tests under studio lighting conditions indicate a very strong red bias on skin tones

I want to understand if this is a problem with a camera or if I am doing something wrong. I will provide full details below, but in a nutshell the camera exhibits a strong red bias on human skin under studio lighting conditions despite all attempts to achieve proper white balance

Conditions:
1) Camera body - Canon EOS 5D
2) Lenses - Canon 28-135 mm f3.5-5.6 or Canon 100 mm f2.8
3) Studio lighting setup - two Elinchrom Style FX400 compacts (rated at 5650 K) supplemented by a few Portaflash fill-ins. Softboxes on all main flashes.
4) Light balance - custom (using Jessops gray card) or explicit Color Temperature Compensation (set to 5700 K)
5) Control gray card shots indicate no problems with white balance
6) Color space - Adobe RGB 1998
7) Studio background - black velvet or white paper; studio walls are painted neutral pale yellow, no reflective or strong-colored surfaces within flash range
8 ) Ambient light - non-existent for all practical means and purposes (about 16 f-stops under main flash)
9) Model - caucasian female, blond, fair skinned, minimum make-up
10) Picture Style – 0 0 0 0
11) Aperture - around f/8

Problem manifestation:
1) The camera shows a significant red tint on all photographs which is particularly pronounced on the subject's skin
2) This tint is much stronger then I ever experienced with any other EOS camera body. It is also the “wrong color” from what I experienced before with EOSes - my previous bodies tended to have a slight yellow or blue tint, never red.
3) The RGB histogram indicates a strong red bias.
4) This bias could be compensated with a custom “Picture style”, but it requires a “Skin Tone” of 2 or 3 (out of -4 to +4 range). This appears to be excessive.
5) EOS 10D body demonstrates no such problem

I know that red-skin is a common problem for portraiture, but I have never experienced it so strongly under what is supposed to be highly controlled conditions.

Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AmpedPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,165 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2006
Location: socal
     
Mar 07, 2007 20:43 |  #2

hum my 5D does great in studio. Are you shooting in RAW or JPEG? If your shooting in JPEG set the Picture styles to Faithful. if your shooting in RAW and not editing in Canons software it doesnt matter which Picture style you shoot in....


Canon 5D Mark II (x2), 30D, 40D, G10, 70-200 F4 IS (x2), 16-35 f2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, 430 EX II (x2), 580 EX II Tamron 28-75 F2.8 (x2), Tonkia 12-24 F4, 10-18 Fisheye, Full studio with some light :)
AmpedPhoto.com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sboerup
Senior Member
Avatar
841 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AZ
     
Mar 07, 2007 21:29 |  #3

Never had a problem with that. I shoot raw, leave it on "normal" picture style and process in DPP.

Is your color shift all normal, and your factory settings on the default? I can't imagine that being a sensor problem, just the internals.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doug ­ Pardee
Senior Member
838 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Southern California, USA
     
Mar 08, 2007 01:17 |  #4

You didn't mention which Picture Style you're using. Canon's "Portrait" picture style is rather notorious for producing pink-to-red skin tones; it's not clear if that's supposed to add color to pale skin, or maybe if it looks good with Asian skin. But whatever the reasoning, the result is still over-pink for most subjects at the default settings. The usual recommendation is to turn the saturation down one or two notches, and turn the color tone up one or two notches. Or just use another picture style, such as Faithful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Mar 08, 2007 11:59 |  #5

There was quite a long detailed discussion of this problem on the Rob Galbraith forum last year. It was the consensus that it is due to the DIGIC II processor in the newer cameras. The best solution posted, which I use now, was to correct it in Photoshop. Make a Channel Mixer adjustment layer. Select the Green output channel and set it for Green-80% and Red-20%. Now select the Blue output channel and set it for Blue-90% and Red-10%. You can tweak the values to get the exact color you want.

It is a bit of bother to have to do this, but you can create an action if you have many images to correct. Here is a sample of the effect.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ninab
Senior Member
Avatar
411 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
     
Mar 08, 2007 12:52 |  #6

chtgrubbs wrote in post #2837466 (external link)
There was quite a long detailed discussion of this problem on the Rob Galbraith forum last year. It was the consensus that it is due to the DIGIC II processor in the newer cameras. The best solution posted, which I use now, was to correct it in Photoshop. Make a Channel Mixer adjustment layer. Select the Green output channel and set it for Green-80% and Red-20%. Now select the Blue output channel and set it for Blue-90% and Red-10%. You can tweak the values to get the exact color you want.

It is a bit of bother to have to do this, but you can create an action if you have many images to correct. Here is a sample of the effect.

Thanks! I've been working on my own little tweaks for this, but will try this one. Glad this is not another case of me "seeing things". :D


2x5D/grip; 24-70 f/2.8L, 85 f/1.2L II, 70-200 f/2.8 ISL, 70-200 f/4L, 15 fisheye, 28-200, Sigma 105 Macro, lensbaby 2.0; 580EXII, 580EX, 550EX

focusphototahoe.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elTwitcho
frustrating as ....
Avatar
1,478 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Mar 08, 2007 13:18 |  #7

chtgrubbs wrote in post #2837466 (external link)
There was quite a long detailed discussion of this problem on the Rob Galbraith forum last year. It was the consensus that it is due to the DIGIC II processor in the newer cameras. The best solution posted, which I use now, was to correct it in Photoshop. Make a Channel Mixer adjustment layer. Select the Green output channel and set it for Green-80% and Red-20%. Now select the Blue output channel and set it for Blue-90% and Red-10%. You can tweak the values to get the exact color you want.

It is a bit of bother to have to do this, but you can create an action if you have many images to correct. Here is a sample of the effect.

I'm glad it's not me either. I've noticed a reddish/magenta hue to skin tones that has been making colour balancing absolute hell. I'm going to give this a try and I'm pretty optimistic considering the two examples look pretty much just like how my shots look before correcting, and how I'd like them to look post correcting.

Thank you :)


Rich
Some of my recent projects
Portraits from 2007 (external link)
Urban Gallery (external link)
Where Toronto Was Built (external link)
People and such (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ninab
Senior Member
Avatar
411 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
     
Mar 08, 2007 14:13 |  #8

I tried this and ended up toning the corrections down a bit, the results were a tad too yellow; but it's a great way to deal with this! :)


2x5D/grip; 24-70 f/2.8L, 85 f/1.2L II, 70-200 f/2.8 ISL, 70-200 f/4L, 15 fisheye, 28-200, Sigma 105 Macro, lensbaby 2.0; 580EXII, 580EX, 550EX

focusphototahoe.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tixeon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,251 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2004
Location: 44644
     
Mar 08, 2007 17:57 |  #9

I had that problem also until I set Picture style to "neutral" in DPP when processing RAW to TIF.


Tim
______
Any cat owner will tell you -- no one really owns a cat...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Mar 08, 2007 18:57 |  #10

Not owning a 5D, but knowing bits and pieces of color management theory my answer would be that the camera can't capture wrong color. There's an error in a processing step somewhere (look like the DigicII processor)

So you'll have to manually override the in-camera processing. You should be able to cure it by chooting raw and calibrating to a color checker like this (external link).

Hopefully if you're using third party RAW converter it would not be affected by the in-camera processing.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
Avatar
3,275 posts
Likes: 85
Joined May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
     
Mar 09, 2007 01:04 |  #11

Mine does great in the studio, oh wait, I set the custom white balance first. ;)


5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elTwitcho
frustrating as ....
Avatar
1,478 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Mar 09, 2007 09:40 |  #12

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #2839509 (external link)
Hopefully if you're using third party RAW converter it would not be affected by the in-camera processing.

With ACR it still comes up.

Through my experience, there is no color temperature that corrects this issue. I've used a white card/color checker (wahtever you want to call it) to set my white point off of, and there is still too much magenta in the skin tones. It isn't that all the colours are shifted in any one direction (something that can be fixed with colour balance) but rather the pinks are more saturated than the rest of the colours.


Rich
Some of my recent projects
Portraits from 2007 (external link)
Urban Gallery (external link)
Where Toronto Was Built (external link)
People and such (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Mar 09, 2007 10:23 |  #13

elTwitcho wrote in post #2842508 (external link)
With ACR it still comes up.

Through my experience, there is no color temperature that corrects this issue. I've used a white card/color checker (wahtever you want to call it) to set my white point off of, and there is still too much magenta in the skin tones. It isn't that all the colours are shifted in any one direction (something that can be fixed with colour balance) but rather the pinks are more saturated than the rest of the colours.

Beats me then.

It'd be interesting to know what they suggested on rob gailbrath's forums as the solution.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ninab
Senior Member
Avatar
411 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
     
Mar 09, 2007 11:56 |  #14

I applied this

chtgrubbs wrote in post #2837466 (external link)
There was quite a long detailed discussion of this problem on the Rob Galbraith forum last year. It was the consensus that it is due to the DIGIC II processor in the newer cameras. The best solution posted, which I use now, was to correct it in Photoshop. Make a Channel Mixer adjustment layer. Select the Green output channel and set it for Green-80% and Red-20%. Now select the Blue output channel and set it for Blue-90% and Red-10%. You can tweak the values to get the exact color you want.

to about 200 shots and it works great!!!! Just make an action and link it to a key, then it takes .2 seconds to apply

Thank you, chtgrubbs!:)


2x5D/grip; 24-70 f/2.8L, 85 f/1.2L II, 70-200 f/2.8 ISL, 70-200 f/4L, 15 fisheye, 28-200, Sigma 105 Macro, lensbaby 2.0; 580EXII, 580EX, 550EX

focusphototahoe.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Mar 11, 2007 11:43 |  #15

You are very welcome.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,617 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
EOS 5D + studio lighting - strong red bias on skin tones
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2699 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.