Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Mar 2007 (Saturday) 15:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 300mm f/2.8

 
cyberhounds
Member
Avatar
92 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: North Buckinghamshire, UK
     
Mar 10, 2007 15:27 |  #1

Hello all,

I've been saving for a while and almost have enough to buy the Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 (lucky old me!).

I'm after opinions on the lens. It's one of those "lens for life" type of purchases for me (it's either replace my car or get the lens, and although the car's getting on a bit, it still works!) and I want to make sure I don't regret getting it.

I'm after it for it's speed and image quality (it'll be going on the front of my 1D mk2n which will no doubt turn into a 1D mk3 in due course!). I photograph anything with fur or feathers and find my Canon 100-400 struggles with focusing speed if anything moves towards me at any sort of speed or in low light (although don't have the same sort of issues with my 70-200 f/2.8 ) I also occaisionally shoot motorsport (cars).

Does anyone know of any solid rumours of this lens being replaced any time soon? Or if Canon may bring out a zoom lens with a similar focusing speed (I'm dreaming of a 200-400 f/4!).

I've also considered waiting a while longer and going for the Canon 500mm f/4, but I've a feeling it may be a bit overkill for me (this year anyway!). And I could always (shock horror) get closer to the subject rather than going for bigger glass (which I've found to be more fun anyway)!

Thanks for any help.

Cheers,
Ben


Comments & critique always welcome...

http://www.benpage.co.​uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Mar 10, 2007 15:31 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

its about the finest lens Canon makes. works great with a 1.4 or 2x, can't ask for much else


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rocklyons
Goldmember
Avatar
1,362 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma
     
Mar 10, 2007 16:27 |  #3

I agree. Great lens.


ROCK

My Gear
You can see my life in pictures at http://rocklyons.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
(or at least parts of it)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
runninmann
what the heck do I know?
Avatar
8,156 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Michigan-U.S.A.
     
Mar 10, 2007 16:31 |  #4

cyberhounds wrote in post #2848896 (external link)
Hello all,

I've been saving for a while and almost have enough to buy the Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 (lucky old me!).

I'm after opinions on the lens. It's one of those "lens for life" type of purchases for me (it's either replace my car or get the lens, and although the car's getting on a bit, it still works!) and I want to make sure I don't regret getting it.

I'm after it for it's speed and image quality (it'll be going on the front of my 1D mk2n which will no doubt turn into a 1D mk3 in due course!). I photograph anything with fur or feathers and find my Canon 100-400 struggles with focusing speed if anything moves towards me at any sort of speed or in low light (although don't have the same sort of issues with my 70-200 f/2.8 ) I also occaisionally shoot motorsport (cars).

Does anyone know of any solid rumours of this lens being replaced any time soon? Or if Canon may bring out a zoom lens with a similar focusing speed (I'm dreaming of a 200-400 f/4!).

I've also considered waiting a while longer and going for the Canon 500mm f/4, but I've a feeling it may be a bit overkill for me (this year anyway!). And I could always (shock horror) get closer to the subject rather than going for bigger glass (which I've found to be more fun anyway)!

Thanks for any help.

Cheers,
Ben

How about Sigmasaurus Rex?;)


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5005
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Mar 10, 2007 16:37 |  #5

I would think the fact that literally thousands of sports 'togs are lugging this lens around the worlds venues would be validation enough...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy ­ Bright
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Watford, Herts, England
     
Mar 10, 2007 16:41 |  #6

Love mine. If it's fast and sharp you want, then it's as good as it gets. Fast moving subjects coming directly towards you are about the toughest job... but your camera's AF will be the main factor with a 300/2.8.


Andy
1Ds MkII | 5D MkIII | 600mm f4 | 300mm f2.8 | 70-200 f4 | Sigma 15-30mm f3.5-4.5 EX | Gitzo GT5541LS | Gitzo GT2541| Wimberley WH-200
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Mar 10, 2007 16:48 |  #7

Yes it's a great lens. If you find your 400mm to be generally enough reach already then you'll be happy with the IQ and speed of the lens. If you are using the 100-400 at 400 all the time then you need the 500 f/4.


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cyberhounds
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
92 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: North Buckinghamshire, UK
     
Mar 11, 2007 03:31 |  #8

Thanks for all the responses. I'll be going for the 300mm then! I can always slap on an extender if I need the extra reach and start saving for the 500mm later ;-)a

I think I'll pass on the new Sigmonster!

Cheers,
Ben


Comments & critique always welcome...

http://www.benpage.co.​uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
busterboy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,436 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire Born n Bred.
     
Mar 11, 2007 04:35 |  #9

cyberhounds wrote in post #2851584 (external link)
Thanks for all the responses. I'll be going for the 300mm then! I can always slap on an extender if I need the extra reach and start saving for the 500mm later ;-)a

I think I'll pass on the new Sigmonster!

Cheers,
Ben

Good call, I have both the 300mm and the 500mm and both are top of the foodchain in Canon's line-up.:)

You will not regret buying this lens, The results are astonishing..;)


[COLOR=blue][COLOR=bla​ck][COLOR=blue]| Canon 1DMkIII | 16-35mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm F/2.8L IS | Canon 1.4X Extender | Canon 2X Extender |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Mar 11, 2007 08:06 as a reply to  @ busterboy's post |  #10

I got that Lens yesterday.
I swear it is on my 1Dmk2N till now, and not sure when it will leave that body, i think by one of two options: either when i will get 1D III then definitely that lens will move to 1DIII or when i will get 600 or 400 then my 300 has to withdraw for higher majesty glasses.;):p
I got shots of the Half Moon yesterday by 300 + 2x TC, i can't tell that but i swear it is sharper than my 100-400 bare.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cyberhounds
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
92 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: North Buckinghamshire, UK
     
Mar 11, 2007 09:31 |  #11

Cool - fingers crossed I should be able to get it in a couple of weeks, can't wait!! :-D

Cheers,
Ben


Comments & critique always welcome...

http://www.benpage.co.​uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Mar 11, 2007 09:34 |  #12

cyberhounds wrote in post #2852376 (external link)
Cool - fingers crossed I should be able to get it in a couple of weeks, can't wait!! :-D

Cheers,
Ben

So it is 300 f2.8?


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cyberhounds
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
92 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: North Buckinghamshire, UK
     
Mar 11, 2007 09:57 |  #13

Certainly is!


Comments & critique always welcome...

http://www.benpage.co.​uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Mar 11, 2007 10:17 |  #14

cyberhounds wrote in post #2852485 (external link)
Certainly is!

Welcome to the club [Even i am so late to join myself].
We will see many shots by this lens then, tempting me more to use this lens.

Good Luck and Congrats for now.:D


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 11, 2007 10:24 as a reply to  @ Tareq's post |  #15

I have put thousands of shots through my 300 and it is just an oustanding lens. It is probably in the top 5 sharpest lenses that Canon has. Slap a 1.4TC on the front and it is still amazing.

I have heard of no rumors to it being replaced. Even if it was going to be replaced the current version is so good that it would be hard to improve on short of making it less than 2.8.

I have the 500 and 600 as well and while they are sharp, they don't come close to the 300. You can walk and handhold the 300 for most of a day.

It is a purchase that you will cherish for a long time.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,180 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Canon 300mm f/2.8
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1312 guests, 153 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.