I was just surprised we have products coming at us weekly for promotional exposure etc, not even a discount whatsoever.
Mar 20, 2007 14:00 | #46 Permanent banI was just surprised we have products coming at us weekly for promotional exposure etc, not even a discount whatsoever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigRed450 Senior Member 635 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2003 Location: South Gillies, Ontario, Can More info | Mar 20, 2007 16:55 | #47 2KOOL Performance.com wrote in post #2900376 Jeff can you tell us what settings, lens you used for that 2nd shot which is amazing?? First image 1DmkII w/ 100-400L AV mode ISO 200 1/800 sec f-8 @ 400mm 2KOOL Performance.com wrote in post #2900376 Talked to CANON about help for the site etc for free advertising and promotion etc. They have no interest whatsoever and won't even give any discount on any product so honestly? at this time I'm a bit disappointed we went with CANON over another brand, surely there would have been 'some' degree of support for what we had to offer. Furthermore, the rep I spoke with would not even give any advice whatsoever on lenses ? Keep an eye on the link provided above ... I'll be adding the drag shots tonight You would actually be better off getting your camera gear sponsorship through your local camera dealer. He is the one that inevitably will benefit from the promotion. Jeff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2007 17:11 | #48 Permanent banNice photo's Big'n ... your shutter speed 1/800 and 1/1200 I was told to try max 1/500 other guys were suggesting 1/320 ??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2007 17:30 | #49 Permanent banWould this lens be ok guys, considering we're getting pretty close to the action and since accepted a perfec lens is like $1500 US ( see ridiculous )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigRed450 Senior Member 635 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2003 Location: South Gillies, Ontario, Can More info | Mar 20, 2007 18:57 | #50 The 28-135 is a good lens, but you're going to have to go at least the 70-300 IS for action.. http://www.canogacamera.com/detail.aspx?ID=22655 Jeff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2007 19:02 | #51 Permanent banor how about this and call it a day L! and use a tripod to keep images stable? seems like a good way to save $1200 Canadian?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2007 19:04 | #52 Permanent banBigRed450 wrote in post #2903513 The 28-135 is a good lens, but you're going to have to go at least the 70-300 IS for action.. http://www.canogacamera.com/detail.aspx?ID=22655 Where in Ontario are you? Eastern Ontario....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigRed450 Senior Member 635 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2003 Location: South Gillies, Ontario, Can More info | Mar 20, 2007 19:06 | #53 The 75-300 may work for a while but its not a very good lens. Totally up to you.. Jeff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Mar 20, 2007 19:12 | #54 can you explain your post.... why the 70-300 IS ( considering I could use a tripod at all times if necessary ) is better for action than 28-135 especially when we can get pretty close to these sleds racing or during radar events? FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2007 19:15 | #55 Permanent banagreed... good point PhotosGuy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigRed450 Senior Member 635 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2003 Location: South Gillies, Ontario, Can More info | Mar 20, 2007 19:32 | #56 The 70-300 IS is a better lens all round then the 75-300 ie better glass, better build etc. The 100-400 on the otherhand is even that much better and carries the L (Pro) designation. You'll soon find, you get what you pay for in the photo equipment world. There is good reason those lenses are $2000+. Jeff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mortgage101 Senior Member 477 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Orange County, CA More info | Mar 20, 2007 20:50 | #57 I have a Tamron 70-300 F4-5.6 honestly I get great pictures out of it. It wasn't expensive as my other 2 lenses and it takes great pictures on a tripod so no complaint. Capture the moment that took your breath away. Savor each one and look for more to come!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2007 20:54 | #58 Permanent bandoes it have image stabilization Mortgage 101 ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 21, 2007 07:20 | #59 Permanent banTTT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PaulEY Senior Member 346 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Mar 21, 2007 07:32 | #60 For taking anything that's moving using a tripod especially for motorposrt peronsally speaking is pointless, you you can't get a steady shot of something moving fast with whatever lens in the 200mm range with a shutter speed of 1/250 or above then you must have shaky hands.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2724 guests, 144 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||