Hello, I was told that Gimp is great for editing photos even though it's free I am having problem with their web site which is temporarily unavailable.
Is this software reliable for non professionals?
Any feedback, welcome
Thank you
Trek 9.9
trek9.8 Member 46 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: San Diego , Ca More info | Mar 15, 2007 13:04 | #1 Hello, I was told that Gimp is great for editing photos even though it's free I am having problem with their web site which is temporarily unavailable.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
purelithium Blithering Idiot 1,108 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada More info | Mar 15, 2007 13:45 | #2 It's a GREAT alternative to Photoshop, which can be a daunting investment for a hobby-photographer. R.M. Gelan Hopkins
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | Mar 15, 2007 14:03 | #3 purelithium wrote in post #2876049 It's a GREAT alternative to Photoshop, which can be a daunting investment for a hobby-photographer. This is the prime reason why Adobe developed and released Photoshop Elements. Elements in now in Version 5 and is a great alternative to the full version of Photoshop. You might look at that before trying GIMP. You can download 30 day trial versions from Adobe's website. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcrebelxt Goldmember 3,016 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Mar 15, 2007 14:58 | #4 Gimp is Great, I used it for a few years before starting to use Elements (only because it came free with my Wacom tablet.) I still use it for layer masks and other things elements can't do. David C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sathi Senior Member 656 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Albany, NY More info | Mar 15, 2007 15:29 | #5 My experience is limited to elements version 3, but compared to that version of elements gimp is far, FAR superior in my opinion. Although, if you are used to the photoshop interface already gimp might seem cumbersome...great features though. 20d / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Canon 10-22 / Canon 100mm macro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
slappysam Goldmember 1,452 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Near Plymouth, MA More info | Mar 15, 2007 15:46 | #6 Uhh, in my opinion I much prefer my old Photoshop Elements 2.0 to gimp. Not saying there is anything wrong with gimp (it is free after all) but there are quite a few more nice features that gimp doesn't provide. Also, a few of them that are the same are easier to use with PSE, as well as the fact that most tutorials use Photoshop and elements is going to be a lot easier to follow along with than GIMP. 40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcrebelxt Goldmember 3,016 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Mar 15, 2007 16:17 | #7 True, many tools are nicer in elements (Especially like healing brush, and spot healing tool.) Also readeye tool. I like the organizer in Elements also. Plus a majority of Plugins will work with Elements also. (And don't forget Camera Raw, in case DPP isn't doing it for you for some odd reason.) David C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2007 16:28 | #8 well the site is down again. It looks like one has to download two software in try gimp?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcrebelxt Goldmember 3,016 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Mar 15, 2007 16:32 | #9 try this link... seems to be up for me. David C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcrebelxt Goldmember 3,016 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Mar 15, 2007 16:33 | #10 also, install the GTK runtime environment FIRST, then install gimp David C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stackinchips Member 237 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Francisco, CA -SOMA- More info | Mar 15, 2007 17:49 | #11 does an open source raw converter exist out there somewhere? Canon 24-70 F/2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
purelithium Blithering Idiot 1,108 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada More info | Mar 15, 2007 17:51 | #12 Why not use the one that comes from Canon? R.M. Gelan Hopkins
LOG IN TO REPLY |
E-K Senior Member 983 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Canada More info | Mar 15, 2007 20:32 | #13 Stackinchips wrote in post #2877257 does an open source raw converter exist out there somewhere? I have CS but not Bridge Yes. I personally use UFRaw (ufraw.sourceforge.net). It works standalone or as a plug-in for the GIMP. If using it as a plug-in for the GIMP, make sure you install it after you have installed the GIMP.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
E-K Senior Member 983 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Canada More info | Mar 15, 2007 20:43 | #14 I have mainly been using the GIMP for my photo editing needs. I did recently get Photoshop Elements 3.0 with a Wacom tablet. I like Elements for doing digital photo painting as it feels a bit smoother with the tablet than the GIMP. I'm the other way around though in that the Elements interface seems a little wacked to me having used the GIMP for so long
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcrebelxt Goldmember 3,016 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Mar 15, 2007 22:32 | #15 Are you following me around, E-K? David C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1855 guests, 100 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||