Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 16 Mar 2007 (Friday) 01:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Shooting in RAW?

 
Ainoko
Stupidest Question Award 2008
Avatar
1,406 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
     
Mar 16, 2007 01:53 |  #1

Okay, I'm a pretty amateur photographer, and I was wondering if I should be shooting in RAW all the time? My biggest concern is the fact that I do not know much (actually anything) about white balancing. How effective is the AWB on my camera, and what are the biggest benefits to shooting RAW versus Large/Fine? I'm guessing the best thing to do would be to learn about white balance and manually set it... but until then...

I know my way around Photoshop pretty well, so if there is any easy way to fix white balance that would be better than shooting with AWB, please inform.

Thanks a lot!


Full Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …?p=4846834&post​count=1005

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snokid
Member
158 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Mar 16, 2007 03:54 |  #2

AWB does a pretty good job on the XT.

Set WB take a shot of white paper, then hit set in custom WB

In PS with a JPG image>adjustents>curves click on the far right eye dropper then click on something white in your photo, do the same with black.

In ACR you can still "eye dropper" it, but the temp slider is a better way to see cause an effect. Sometimes you don't want the correct WB, you might want it warmer for example.

But the other thing about RAW is you can save some missed shots you would have a harder time saving if shot in jpg.

Bob


shutterstock.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 16, 2007 03:57 |  #3

Must read:
http://www.ronbigelow.​com/articles/raw/raw.h​tm (external link)


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Mar 16, 2007 10:56 |  #4

First, I never trust AWB. More on that here: Gray card: Why your meter may be lying to you!
Notice that the very last exposure in the 2nd group was of a gray card.

and what are the biggest benefits to shooting RAW versus Large/Fine?

While this thread started out with the AWB subject, there's a great illustration on page 2 (Post #58.) that illustrate easily seen information loss in a web jpeg shot in the camera & one derived from a RAW file.
Auto White Balance - works really well

Then there's this: Take 2 identical shots, one in RAW & one at max jpeg. Use a tripod to be sure each shot has the exact information in it. Convert the RAW file to jpeg. Look at the two file sizes.
A max jpg from my 20D is 2,754 KB. The exact same shot with the jpg extracted from RAW is 4,315 KB which is 1.57X larger.
Why throw those extra bits away?

RE: "MiSTeaKs" When I screw up...
Why I love RAW - '53 Ford Sunliner

-=The RAW Faqs=- RAW Processing info and links
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=80337
-=The RAW Faqs=- RAW Processing info and links


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Mar 16, 2007 22:06 |  #5

The beauty about RAW as far as I am concerned is that you DONT need to know anything about WB per say. I do a CWB and then if I dont like it I can use the simple WB tool that comes with DPP. I just click on something I KNOW is white and it adjusts the pictures...

I found DPP MUCH more simple then any other program I tried, its gets alot of poopooing on here and I am SURE it doesnt do all the cool things that many other programs do, but it does pretty much all I need so far...


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,106 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Shooting in RAW?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is slipper1963
1462 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.