GSH wrote in post #2888284
Fairly standard T&C's to be honest. There's nothing to prevent personal use of any shots taken but if you sell them without accreditation they might chase you.
I wouldn't attend the British GP due to the cost. A weekend ticket for F1 here would finance several visits to smaller event which are much more enjoyable.
Re-read the terms again. Any public display. These very forums would be legally regarded as a public display. I also note that the OP has a 400mm f5.6 lens, which is in direct trouble with rule 5(q). If the Australian grand prix organisers wanted to do so, they could easily do a DMCA take down notice of the POTN forums until it was removed (yes, after Australia agreed to the FTA, we now recognise the US DMCA laws). Of course, the POTN servers aren't located in Australia, but from a legal perspective, they could do it. Probably not worth their time and money, but anything is possible these days.
I personally detest these sorts of rules, they're intended to make money for the establishment when they've done nothing to earn it. They intend to unfairly control overs, beyond reasonable means. They intend to give preferential treatment to the "pros". Gee, the pros must be really scared and insecure if they're worried about some amateurs besting their images. I believe in competition on fair and equal ground, if I, as an amateur take a better shot than a pro, then I did my job right - picking the right location, right time, right gear etc. Why should I get penalised, and not be able to sell the image for a profit because I did a better job than the pro?
I personally doubt that these T&Cs are legally enforceable anyways, since this is an event held on a public course.
Dave
hell, I'm sick and tired of the average people being so gullible as to let all of their rights be unreasonably taken away from them. Wake up people.