Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Mar 2007 (Saturday) 09:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photoshop 7

 
dharris
Senior Member
Avatar
844 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
     
Mar 17, 2007 09:55 |  #1

For those of you who use Photoshop and the unsharpen mask tool, what do you have your set at?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EskoLius
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Helsinki
     
Mar 17, 2007 14:58 |  #2

[not knowing your familiarity with photo editing some preliminary remark:]
There are no such things as set values in Photoshop. The aesthetics, the picture itself, the intended use make a big difference what to do.

...but I find myself giving rarely any higher amount than 100-130%, and radius higher than 2,5 pixels. Mostly something like 80% and 1,6px.
It's important to find the right point of threshold: having too small threshold and you end up destroying the skin or other smooth areas, having too high and you get nothing done. Something like 8-18 levels will do for many pictures.

After having applied unsharp mask one needs to fade the effect either for whole image (fade-command and some percentage like 75), or with the History tool (eg. to blur the background)).

Trust your eye and consult your friend - and the output device :)


Canon Powershot Pro1, Nikon d80, Olympus 5050
home (external link) | picasa pics (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rowdyred94
Goldmember
Avatar
1,969 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN, USA
     
Mar 17, 2007 15:11 |  #3

In the G forum?

It totally varies with the image. To say there's a "setting" for sharpening is like saying there's an aperture for photography.


~ Clint :: Galleries (external link) ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
844 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
     
Mar 18, 2007 16:00 as a reply to  @ rowdyred94's post |  #4

Thanks guys, I understand that there is no real setting or really one that works for all, but for my 20d files, most of the time, a setting of amount 300%, radius .3 and threshold at zero worked great. Just wondering if anyone had such a starting point as that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EskoLius
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Helsinki
     
Mar 19, 2007 02:56 |  #5

I see that kind of settings working very similarly to the basic Sharpen command and as an other way to perform a basic overall sharpening. But works for that purpose, of course.

I haven't done any comparisons and I'd like to hear when does it give clear advantage over Sharpen command.

PS. sorry if we should be talking about this in some other lounge :)


Canon Powershot Pro1, Nikon d80, Olympus 5050
home (external link) | picasa pics (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,143 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Photoshop 7
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
853 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.