Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Mar 2007 (Tuesday) 17:22
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which one?"
135mm f/2.8
3
6.8%
85mm f/1.8
41
93.2%

44 voters, 44 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

85mm f/1.8 or 135mm f/2.8 ?

 
Swift
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
     
Mar 20, 2007 17:22 |  #1

I'm trying to decide on which lens to buy...

Based on my post here:
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=285310

I looked at a very stunning image taken with the 135mm f/2.8:
http://www.pbase.com/m​wayned/image/64048251 (external link)

Haven't browsed too many 85mm f/1.8 photos...

What do you think out of those two?


Canon 550D | Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM | Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon Speedlight 430EX | Raynox DCR-250 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Swift
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
     
Mar 20, 2007 18:34 |  #2

7 votes for 85mm, 1 for 135mm...Alright. Will wait for some replys and more votes.


Canon 550D | Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM | Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon Speedlight 430EX | Raynox DCR-250 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pturton
Senior Member
733 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Region Niagara, Ontario, Canada
     
Mar 20, 2007 18:36 |  #3

For your low light needs and portraits that you mention in your other post, the 85 f/1.8 will be of great use. My 85 f/1.8 has been getting more usage than my 135L the past few months.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Swift
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
     
Mar 22, 2007 09:00 |  #4

Any other comments?


Canon 550D | Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM | Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon Speedlight 430EX | Raynox DCR-250 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Mar 22, 2007 09:04 |  #5

I voted for the 85 F/1.8, a full stop + more than the 135 F/2.8


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
farrukh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,969 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
     
Mar 22, 2007 09:05 |  #6

85 got the edge, very fast ring USM, better build, better IQ.


5D Mark II + 40D | Lenses: Sigma 150-500mm BigmOS / Canon 24-105mm F4L IS / Canon 70-200 F4L IS / Canon 85mm 1.8 / Sigma Macro 70mm f/2.8 EX / Sigma 10-20mm EX / Canon 50mm f/1.8 II / Sigma 1.4x APO TC / Kenko 2x PRO300 DG. Lighting: Canon 580EX II + Metz 58 AF-1 + Sunpak 383...
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrcoons
Senior Member
Avatar
436 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Normal, Illinois, USA
     
Mar 22, 2007 10:55 as a reply to  @ farrukh's post |  #7

I had to make this same choice several months ago and I went with the 85 F/1.8 for the extra light. Have not regretted it so far and don't think I will. I do not appear to need the extra reach of the 135. (I use my 85 for candid portrait shots at school events.)


Mark
Photo Site (external link) blog (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Please be my Fan on Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mark III, 7D2 and 5D3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 22, 2007 11:27 |  #8

But I consider those 2 to be 2 different focal lengths. either you need an 85 or a 135. Both are sharp lenses and bargains.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,776 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Sussex UK
     
Mar 22, 2007 11:30 |  #9

The 85 is more suitable for a crop camera. IMO the 135 SF lens is a bit too long for routine use - unless you have a specific need - and the soft focus effect can be duplicated effectively in photoshop.

The 135 f/2.8 SF was a lens developed with 35mm film users in mind, as a long portrait telephoto, and the SF settings were designed to complement this.


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Swift
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
     
Mar 22, 2007 16:06 |  #10

Thanks everyone, I guess I will go for the 85mm f/1.8

One question, is the 50mm f/1.4 sharper than the 85mm f/1.8 ? Are they the same besides for focal lengths?

Thanks,
Swift


Canon 550D | Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM | Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon Speedlight 430EX | Raynox DCR-250 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,776 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Sussex UK
     
Mar 22, 2007 16:22 as a reply to  @ Swift's post |  #11

I believe the 85mm is far sharper than the 50

But absolute sharpness is not that important, especially where portraits are concerned.

Your models will not thank you for highlighting their imperfections ;)

The focal length is the real issue. whcih one suits you better? If you are a prime kind of guy, you will probably need both!


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Mar 23, 2007 07:29 as a reply to  @ steved110's post |  #12

I don't have 135 f2.8 SF but i have 135 f2L AF, is it better?


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Mar 23, 2007 14:46 |  #13

The 85mm f/1.8 for me - now if it were the 135L f/2...


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Mar 23, 2007 15:09 |  #14

kevin_c wrote in post #2919024 (external link)
The 85mm f/1.8 for me - now if it were the 135L f/2...

On a crop I'd still get the 85. Unless you're half a football field away, the 85 is plenty long.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pasukun
Goldmember
Avatar
1,388 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: US
     
Mar 23, 2007 15:48 |  #15

In the age of Photoshop..
Soft focus lens is pretty much pointless..
Other than that.. there is no merit for going with 135/2.8 over the 85.8.. except extra focal length.
It has no USM, 1 & 1/3 stops slower and only has 6 blades.


"the things we touch have no permanence.. as there is nothing we can hold onto in this world.. only by letting it go can we truly possess what is real.."

My Gears

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,144 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
85mm f/1.8 or 135mm f/2.8 ?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1721 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.