Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 22 Mar 2007 (Thursday) 23:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for a tripod

 
fredmitcham
Member
219 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Mar 22, 2007 23:06 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I've read some threads but there are so many choices.. I'm looking for the best value that packs as small and light as possible that can solidly hold a 30D and 70-200 F2.8. Help!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DenZ
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Mar 23, 2007 00:15 |  #2

That's quite a heavy combination you have there and I'm no tripod expert at all, but I think you'll need something that's fairly heavy/large.

I own the Slik 400DX, bought it before my XTi and 24-105mm. It handles very well with the load, although I'm sure the 70-200 f/2.8 is significantly heavier than the 24-105 so perhaps you'll need something larger.

*I think this belongs to the accessories & storage forums.


BLOG (external link) | Equipment | flickr (external link) | dentonzhou.com (external link) | Learn something new from 16,000+ online courses (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Linkzi
Goldmember
Avatar
4,263 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Paradise*Hawaii
     
Mar 23, 2007 01:06 |  #3

This thread will be moved soon by the Mods. A whole bunch of info here.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=53864


Aloha,
Lincoln
"Be creative, don't make your photos look like everyone elses"
Eyes F20/40, Brain 5GB, Finger 20mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 23, 2007 08:43 as a reply to  @ Linkzi's post |  #4

I got the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021BPro with a 488RC2 ball head. Go here to see it:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …EG&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)

One thing to bear in mind when shopping for tripods is the weight it will carry. If you get too close to the tripod & head weight limits, they will become unsteady, especially if there's a breeze blowing.

What I did was consider the weight of the camera, lens, flash, strap, possible sandbag, and whatever else might be on the tripod, then added 20% as a safety factor. The 3021BPro fit the bill.

You might wish to check out the Bogen Imaging site:

http://www.bogenimagin​g.us/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomHuckWa
Senior Member
Avatar
257 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Goldendale, Washington state
     
Mar 23, 2007 08:47 |  #5

I agree with 20Droger. Its a great setup.


Please speak slowly and distinctly. I have a wife, AND a computer, I don't need any more confusion in my life.
---------------
I wanted to be a nude photographer, but when I went outside naked, everyone pointed and laughed, so I gave it up.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 23, 2007 09:07 |  #6

fredmitcham wrote in post #2916070 (external link)
I've read some threads but there are so many choices.. I'm looking for the best value that packs as small and light as possible that can solidly hold a 30D and 70-200 F2.8. Help!

The really limiting factors in your spec are the "packs as small and light as possible" and the "solidly hold a 30D and 70-200 F2.8". Those two specs do not usually apply to the same tripod.

There are three variables that apply to tripods - size/weight, rigidity, and price. The most desirable features are small size (low weight), high level of rigidity, and low price. All three cannot be had together. For example, small size/weight and high level of rigidity are not coming together in one tripod without a very high price.

I have used the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021BPro (055ProB outside the U.S.) topped off with their 488RC2 ball head for several years. About a year ago I bought the parts to upgrade mine to the latest configuration. It is a superb package, but cannot be carried attached to the typical camera case. A "long strap" (an accessory from Bogen/Manfrotto) makes it fairly easy to carry across one's back, but it is not a featherweight tripod. It is, however, a medium weight tripod which is superbly versatile and quite acceptably rigid for even some fairly long and heavy lenses.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benandbobbi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,554 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas USA
     
Mar 23, 2007 09:16 |  #7

Another vote for the 3021BPro and the 486CR2


My Gear
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
captainbk
Member
Avatar
89 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: West Coast of Florida
     
Mar 23, 2007 09:21 |  #8

I have a SLIK Pro 700DX to which I have added a SLIK ball head. If you do an online search for reviews on this tripod you will find that it is rated quite high for the price.

I bought the tripod only at B&H for $79 (on special) and found the SLIK balhead on ebay for $40. Other than being heavy (7.5 lb) it is a great tripod. Even my friend with HI-end tripods are impressed with the quality and stability. It is rated at 15 lbs.

Also look on Calumetphoto.com for their Calumet 7100 tripod. It is new and has some pretty good specs. for $69 it is worth a gamble. It holds up to 11 pounds. weighs 4.5 lb and is only 21.25" when collapsed. See this link:http://www.calumetphot​o.com/item/CK7114.html (external link)
I am thinking of bying one of these for my upcoming Alaska vacation. At that price it is almost diposable.

Hope this helps.


Captain Chip
"The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing"

EOS 30d, Sigma 18-200, Sigma 50 Macro, Sigma 135-400 APO, Sigma EF 500 dg Flash, Domke FX-1B bag, Lowepro Toploader 65. (Non-Canon: Fuji S7000, Vivitar 283, 2x Fuji A203 P&S) Flashtrax 40GB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:28 |  #9

I use a Slik CF Pro 613 for my small and light tripod. With a 486RC2 head it supports a 20D (no grip) and 70-200 f/2.8 IS quite well. At 1.5 lb. they don't come much lighter. It only extends to 4 ft., but for the weight, I'm willing to make that sacrifice. It's around 18" including head when collapsed.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Specs
Member
193 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Minnesota
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:48 as a reply to  @ captainbk's post |  #10

This is a very timely thread for me as well since I'm diligently searching for the 'perfect' hiking tripod. I also bought the Slik Pro 700DX with their 3-way pan head ($129.95 at Adorama). It's a terrific tripod, but at nearly 8 pounds, not so portable.
Right now in my shoppng cart, awaiting more blood from my credit card, I have an Induro 8X C014 carbon fiber tripod and SA-12 ball head ($352.00 total). The whole combination weighs about 3.5 lbs, folds to under 20", and will support 8.8 lbs. The heaviest camera/lens combo I have right now is my XTi with a BG-E3 grip, and 100-300 f/5.6 L series zoom. Compared to some of the 'hi-end' CF tripods that rival my mortgage payment in cost, this Induro is looking very inviting. But being a fairly new product, there just ain't much to find as far as critical reviews go. Maybe I'll just be a guinea pig, unless anybody here has first-hand experience with this new brand?


Canon XTi w/BG-E3 Grip
17-85 IS USM, 28-135 IS USM, 100-300 f/5.6 EF'L', 100 1:1 Macro
Hoya/Cokin filters
Support by Slik and Induro. Transport by Tamrac. Processing by the seat-of-my-pants. Screw-ups by myself!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:57 |  #11

another vote for the 3021Bpro and 488RC2


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fredmitcham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
219 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Mar 23, 2007 20:18 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

ok and now whats the cheapest solution if i just want something for the occaisonal nighttime long exposure?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kharakim
Member
83 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Encino, CA
     
Mar 23, 2007 20:45 |  #13

Don't know what your budget is, but I'm using the same setup--30D and 70-200L--with the Velbon EL Carmagne 540A Carbon Fiber Tripod, and I'm very happy with it. The tripod itself (without head) weighs 2.7 pounds, which was a big selling point for me, and it sells at B&H for $275. It's rated at 25 pounds load capacity, which is more than you're likely to need. This particular model is 55 inches fully extended, although of course you add the head height and camera body dimensions (from the base plate to the VF) to get the total height.
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …&O=productlist&​sku=378780 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dannybritton
Senior Member
331 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma
     
Mar 23, 2007 21:57 |  #14

I use the Bogen/Monfratto 3001BPRO with the 3437 three-way head
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …mLargeImage&Q=&​sku=222268 (external link)
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …mLargeImage&Q=&​sku=186289 (external link)

I like this setup. Not too heavy to carry, so I actually use it.


My Photo Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 24, 2007 06:15 |  #15

fredmitcham wrote in post #2920435 (external link)
ok and now whats the cheapest solution if i just want something for the occaisonal nighttime long exposure?

The cheapest solution would be a bean bag filled with sand and placed on a solid surface.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,077 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Looking for a tripod
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1093 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.