Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 23 Mar 2007 (Friday) 10:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Will a 30D be good enough?

 
cincojoe
Member
66 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:45 |  #1

Ok here is my situation. I have a budget of $3500.00 and want to get into portrait and wedding photography. I was just starting to build my portfolio last year with my Nikon gear (d200) but had to sell it and all my gear due to job loss. Everything is great now and I'm back on my feet but I was never really with the D200 high ISO photos. So now I want to buy Canon but I'm not sure if I should spend most of this money on a 5D and maybe one good lens (24-70L) or buy a couple of good lens and get a refurbed 30D. Will the 30D be good enough for IQ and building a nice portfolio or am I wasting my time and money by not just getting the 5D now? Man, why didn't Canon come out with that 40D....lol:mad:

any input would be appreciated.


Canon | Mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ Mike
Goldmember
Avatar
1,023 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Edmonton
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:49 |  #2

The 30D is plenty good enough for most wedding photographers, combined with a good wide lens (like the 17-50 F2.8 IS), it would be perfect for weddings.

When considering your budget to get started in wedding photography...don't forget that you will need plenty of backup. That means at least two bodies and a couple flash units etc.


Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre (external link).
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cincojoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
66 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:54 |  #3

Thanks for the quick response!

I assume you meant the 17-55 F2.8 IS??? The only reason I would want to steer away from that lens would be because it's able to be used on the XTi. 20D, 30D etc. If I decided later to FF, I'll have to lose that lens. But what do I know??...lol


Canon | Mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spphoto
Senior Member
Avatar
387 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
     
Mar 23, 2007 10:56 |  #4

The 24-70 is a good lens, but you'll loose a lot of wide angle on a crop body like the 30D. Ask any of the photogs here and they'll tell you that wide angle is their bread and butter!


~ Stefanie Pletscher
www.spphoto.ca (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:03 |  #5

30D is plenty of camera. If you are serious about this, get the best tool for the job NOW. That means, if the 17-55 is the best tool for the job for a 30D, then get it. Why compromise a couple years of photos for the POSSIBILITY of moving to full frame? Just sell it and get the best lens for a full frame.... WHEN YOU GET THERE.

I had the 24-70L and used it with my 30D. In my humble opinion, it sucked on that camera. It just wasn't wide enough indoors in more crowded spaces. And when I'd back up enough to get the framing I'd want, people would be walking through getting in the shots. 17mm is MUCH MUCH nicer for me on a 1.6 crop camera.

Mind you, if you were using a 5D, the 24-70L would be the lens of choice.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidgr
Member
147 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: near Seattle
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:03 |  #6

cincojoe wrote in post #2917930 (external link)
If I decided later to FF, I'll have to lose that lens.

So what? If you're good enough, you'll have enough money to spend on the new gear. :)

Until the 17-55, I haven't been all that impressed with the EF-S lenses, although the 17-85IS isn't bad. So I started out with a 20D and got a 16-35L, 24-70L and 70-200L. Recently I gave the 20D to my daughter and replaced it with a 30D cuz I couldn't afford a 5D. But someday, I'll get that 5D, and another for backup, and I'll be a happy shooter. :) :cool:


David
Canon 20D & 30D, EF 28-80, EF 75-300, 17-35L, 24-70L and 70-200L f/2.8 IS, 8x1GB Sandisk Ultra II CF, Quantum T5D flash on a Custom Bracket 35-EV powered by a 80W DigitalCameraBattery. Sekonic L-358 light meter.
Older Elan IIe (you remember the film days, don't you?)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ Mike
Goldmember
Avatar
1,023 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Edmonton
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:03 |  #7

I assume you meant the 17-55 F2.8 IS The only reason I would want to steer away from that lens would be because it's able to be used on the XTi. 20D, 30D etc. If I decided later to FF, I'll have to lose that lens. But what do I know??...lol

Sorry, I did mean the 17-55.

I think a lot of photographer did have reservations about investing in lenses that don't cover a full frame...especially one as expensive as the 17-55 F2.8 IS. However, it seems that Canon will be sticking with their 1.6 sensor for a while...so it's unlikely that it will suddenly become obsolete. And if you do upgrade to a full frame body, high quality lenses like this retain their value very well, so I wouldn't worry about getting soaked.


Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre (external link).
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:05 as a reply to  @ spphoto's post |  #8

aBuying the best means you'll never have to look over your shoulder

5D and 24-70 - then flash then build from there




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cincojoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
66 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:13 |  #9

wow....I really didn't expect this much advice so fast! Thank you.

I really want the 5D but it would reallt crash by budget. Could you build a decent portfolio with a 5D and 24-70L? Seems kinda limited?


Canon | Mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jessiper
EEK! I don't want a title anymore!
Avatar
2,067 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR USA
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:35 |  #10

I'd say get a 30D, 17-55Is, and try for a 70-200 2.8 IS soon after. I just don't think $3500 is enough to get everything you need, even just the basics. You'll need 10-12GB memory, at least two camera bodies (because my 30D chokes up on me sometimes), two flashes, a wide angle lens, zoom, and a fast prime like the 50 1.4. Then, do you have the computer needed to process all the RAW files? Also, if you decide to do weddings in the winter, you'll need some sort of studio light and flashmeter, extension cord or battery pack, etc. With only $3500, I'd start out shooting very poor friend's weddings, and wait to charge people until you at least have backup gear. Oh yeah, 24mm on my 30D, as Lloyd said, is just not wide enough, but it's perfect on the 5D.


*Gear: 5D Mark II, 2 5D's, 30D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 24mmL 1.4, 45mm TS-E, 16-35mmL 2.8 II, 70-200L 2.8 IS, 100mm 2.8 macro, 15mm 2.8 fisheye, 580EXII, 580EX, 430EX, AB 800, AB Ring flash, lots of PW's, stands, umbrellas, etc.
Oregon wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:39 |  #11

I'm poor, but I didn't want to not have the 24-70. What I went with was the 30D/10D backup combo, with a 12-24mm (because it can fit the 10D) so when I need wide I can REALLY go wide, 24-70 because it's a beaut, and 70-200 for the long. I seldom use the 70-200 but the other 2 really get the jobs done.

While the IS of the 17-55 is appealing to me, I never liked the range of the kit lens anyway.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cincojoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
66 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:45 |  #12

Thanka for the advice Jeesiper. I already have a few memory cards left over. I also have a DC2.0 G5 Mac system for processing that end is taken care of as well. All i want to do right now is build my portfolio. I have access to tag along with a good friend and be a second photographer at some of his wedding shoots. I just want to be smart about my purchases.

I guess what my real question is would the 30D produce high enough IQ at 8.2? I understand that the 5D is FF and 12mp, but is there going to be a huge difference that people will notice when reviewing photos?


Canon | Mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:47 |  #13

cincojoe wrote in post #2918144 (external link)
I guess what my real question is would the 30D produce high enough IQ at 8.2? I understand that the 5D is FF and 12mp, but is there going to be a huge difference that people will notice when reviewing photos?

The "lowly" 6.3 of the 10D is good enough...


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Mar 23, 2007 11:49 |  #14

cincojoe wrote in post #2918144 (external link)
I guess what my real question is would the 30D produce high enough IQ at 8.2? I understand that the 5D is FF and 12mp, but is there going to be a huge difference that people will notice when reviewing photos?

NO, people will not notice a diff. Actually, I find 8 excessive. Many people here actually downsize their files to about 6MP 3000x2000 when they deliver. I've gotten beautiful 24x36 prints from 8mp. Large billboards you see around town don't even need more than 8mp. How big do you really want to go?


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cincojoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
66 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Mar 23, 2007 12:03 |  #15

ok, here is what I have in my cart now.

Refrubed 30D
Refurbed 17-55 2.8 IS
70-200 2.8L IS

Grand total 3548.90

Sound like a good start?????


Canon | Mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,951 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Will a 30D be good enough?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1046 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.