Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 24 Mar 2007 (Saturday) 07:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ultra II on a 300D. Will I notice the difference?

 
segasaturn
Senior Member
849 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Mar 24, 2007 07:59 |  #1

Sorry if this question comes up about once a day, but this is my situation.

Will I notice a difference between a normal PNY 1gb (not even sure what speed it is, just the normal PNY compact flash), and an Ultra II 1gb on a Rebel 300D?

In my case, is the PNY or the 300D the limiting factor in the write speed?

Would I notice an even bigger jump in speed going to an extreme iii?

Thanks for your help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 24, 2007 08:14 |  #2

Rob Galbraith CF Test on the 300D (external link).
Rob on the 10D (external link).
He doesn't have any results for PNY in the 300D, but the slightly older 10D is about 20-25% faster writing to a "new" Ultra II than to a PNY. The 10D's also a bit faster with the Ultra II than the 300D is. You won't magically see your camera's performance jump, but if you need more memory, an Ultra II would be a good choice. An Extreme III is another 10% faster than the Ultra II, so you're looking at potentially 40% better performance in writes. That's almost a full frame's difference in clearing that 3 frame buffer if you shoot bursts or close-together shots.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,915 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10108
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 24, 2007 09:34 |  #3

segasaturn wrote in post #2922203 (external link)
In my case, is the PNY or the 300D the limiting factor in the write speed?

Would I notice an even bigger jump in speed going to an extreme iii?

Thanks for your help.

The 300D is the bottleneck.
When you look at the charts linked above, also take a moment to see how the same cards perfrom in a 30D...

the 300D and 10D, (and older models) are notoriously slow.. and can not take full advantage of a high speed card. That said, as Jon pints out, if you do get a fast card, you will at least get the best the camera has to offer, but the difference in speed will be very small.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Mar 24, 2007 10:36 |  #4

I have a 1 gig PNY card that is painfully slow on my 300D, compared to Sandisk Extreme III cards on the same camera.

However, on my 20D, the speed difference between CF card brands is hard to notice. The PNY on the 20D is much faster than the Sandisk cards on the 300D. Go figure.

Aparently there's more going on than just read/write speeds of cameras and cards. Some just seem to interact better than others.

In any event, I would not recommend a PNY card for a 300D based on my experience.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orisky
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: the oc
     
Mar 25, 2007 01:32 |  #5

Check out this little test I ran here: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=294188

Compares my UltraII with a cheapy $10 PQI. Yes there's a difference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,391 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Ultra II on a 300D. Will I notice the difference?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
917 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.