Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 25 Mar 2007 (Sunday) 15:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Try this.

 
tmonatr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,585 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 25, 2007 15:31 |  #1

Another take on a flash diffuser. I have not seen this done before (probably has been done, though). I did'nt like my omni-bounce's habit of throwing that shadow when vertical. The Better Bounce Card was better, but I didn't like the rubber band. So, I took my omni-bounce and an Exacto knife and cut the top out of the omni-bounce. I now get a lot more light being bounced off the ceiling and no rubber band to fool with. The shadow, when vertical, is still there, but MUCH less pronounced.


Tim
Bartender - "So, you guys are dictionary salesmen."
Roy Munson - "You would be punctilious in assuming that."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Halliday
Goldmember
Avatar
1,135 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central Iowa, USA
     
Mar 25, 2007 15:38 |  #2

You just cut the top off the Omni? Got any photos to share of the results?


lanceshuey.com (external link)
flickr (external link)
"Like a mechanic who forgets to wipe his hands on a shop rag and then goes home, hugs his wife, and gets a grease stain on her favorite sweater — love touches you, and marks you forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmonatr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,585 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 25, 2007 15:43 |  #3

I kept the side panels intact, which throw light in all directions. I simply cut out the top panel with the knife, which allows much more light to be thrown upward and be bounced.


Tim
Bartender - "So, you guys are dictionary salesmen."
Roy Munson - "You would be punctilious in assuming that."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Mar 25, 2007 15:44 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

next try adding a gel to it


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmonatr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,585 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 25, 2007 15:46 |  #5

Coreypolis, that looks just like mine, minus the gel.


Tim
Bartender - "So, you guys are dictionary salesmen."
Roy Munson - "You would be punctilious in assuming that."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Mar 25, 2007 19:45 |  #6

Controlling the percentage of light that get thrown at the ceiling vs. the percentage that gets thrown straight toward your subject is one of the keys to successful bounced flash.

This is why I recommend the tried-and-true index card & rubber band method. You can slide the card up or down as required. The BBC is sort of like an index card on steroids.

Covering your flash with translucent plastic can be an improvement, but it's not very versatile.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Mar 25, 2007 20:40 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #7

Got any comparison shots? with and without?
I have an eBay Stofen knock-off and was considering doing something similar but didn't want to slice it up unless it really made a difference.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
Avatar
3,365 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2005
Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
     
Mar 25, 2007 23:19 |  #8

tmonatr wrote in post #2928720 (external link)
I kept the side panels intact, which throw light in all directions. I simply cut out the top panel with the knife, which allows much more light to be thrown upward and be bounced.

If you had left the top attached on one side (so its sort of hinged) you would have a home made Fong John.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Mar 26, 2007 05:51 |  #9

mbellot wrote in post #2930733 (external link)
If you had left the top attached on one side (so its sort of hinged) you would have a home made Fong John.

And, you could market it for a ridiculas price and get rich.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,152 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Try this.
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2423 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.