Thanks, everybody, for the comments....
adamlc wrote in post #2932290
Liquidstone, would you say that the original shot on the 100-400+TC is sharper the the siggy combo or not?? and with the term "sigmonster"... do you mean the 300-800? (sorry, I'm always getting mixed up!)- don't worry, just saw it in your sig!
BTW, they are both great shots!
My 100-400 is an excellent copy (as sharp as my 400 5.6L) but both aren't in the same league as my Sigmonster (300-800) or 500 f4.
At 100% view, the Sigmonster + 2x moonshot is sharper. I can even stack a 2x+ 1.4x behind the Sigmonster and still get decent moonshots.
Here's a 100% crop from the Sigmonster + stacked 2x/1.4x, on the 1DM2:
| HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' |
Romy