Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Motorsports 
Thread started 26 Mar 2007 (Monday) 17:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

motox first attemps

 
terryger
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Mar 26, 2007 17:58 |  #1

never shot moto sports so i just took the ones i liked.

i see others take very tight closeups but in my own mind this is great for recognizing an individual rider but not much for showing certain aspects of the sport.i have shots of the the intense side by side rivalry but, to me. they afre pretty much lifeless comapred to the action i am obswerving. these are the shots i would want to see as a viewer.

granted i know nothing of the sport other than the first one to get around wins.

along with any critique on the shots could those that do this more often than me express the reasons for or against this practice?

your moto x knowldge would be greatly appreciated.

thanx for your help

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirt1.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirt2.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirt3.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirt4.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirt5.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirt6.jpg

Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YFZ_52
Senior Member
Avatar
475 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
     
Mar 26, 2007 19:05 |  #2

I love numbers 1 and 5. I liek how in number one like you said its further away and it shows the jump and surroundings. This can be a godo method but make sure the background isn't too distracting. If you look at your number 2 the bridge almost grabes your eve before the rider. Very clear shot and all just the background is a little distracting. On an angle liek that is where Id use a more "close up" angle. Number 5 is great for me because I find it looks real urban. The track looks like its built underneath a bridge in a tight area near a river. This shot gives it that feel and the strcture of the bridge gives a solid background colour type idea and makes the rider stand out great. All great pictures but 1 and 5 stand out for me the most! Kepp on working with angles and playing with settings! Im an ATV racer myself actually! I also enjoy shooting motocross! You'll see lots of my stuff in the spring when the race season starts back up again!

Josh


| flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terryger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Mar 27, 2007 11:36 as a reply to  @ YFZ_52's post |  #3

thanx for the help josh. i see what you mean about the back ground. i actually framed it that way but i am not a moto photog and i can see that it could cause a problem for those more interested in the sportr than the scenery.;)

thats the info i was looking for. i'll be watching for your stuff.


Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YFZ_52
Senior Member
Avatar
475 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
     
Mar 27, 2007 20:22 |  #4

I know what you mena by you purposly had the object back there for something interesting in the background. In some cases it works and make the photo better, but you just have too choose carefully what you put in your background. Im like you aswell. I love shooting motocross but at time my scenery love comes out of me and I take all the attention away from the rider with something else ;) haha happens to the best of us! I see your from Cali. Must be a lot of tracks and such around you? I would love to move to Cali.


| flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barP
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: texas
     
Mar 27, 2007 20:35 as a reply to  @ YFZ_52's post |  #5

i'm a rider and a shooter, and for me, #5 is outstanding. it makes the rider clearly stand out, which is something the others lack.

wp.


www.dapixa.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terryger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Mar 29, 2007 14:49 as a reply to  @ barP's post |  #6

thanx for the info.

i will shoot some more here very soon and ask for your further help!;)

yfz, yes , we have 2 tracks in the little town i live in but that is becae there happens to be two awesom river bottoms that are dry and sandy 99% of the year.

yuba city and marysville. they are about 3 miles apart but on 2 different rivers. the feather and the yuba. this is the yuba.


Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barP
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: texas
     
Mar 29, 2007 15:54 as a reply to  @ terryger's post |  #7

the more i look at that number 5, the more i like it. the rider is obviously pretty skilled (the first requirement to a great moto pic!) and you have him framed against a backdrop that adds interest to the photo without taking any away from him. very well done!

wp.


www.dapixa.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terryger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Mar 30, 2007 12:02 |  #8

barP wrote in post #2950956 (external link)
the more i look at that number 5, the more i like it. the rider is obviously pretty skilled (the first requirement to a great moto pic!) and you have him framed against a backdrop that adds interest to the photo without taking any away from him. very well done!

wp.

thanx for the nice words:D

#5 and #6 are the same guy. he seems skilled in the high jump but you can also see that he is a "ball's out" rider as he came close to getting a good close up of the ground one the nextjump.

then again, ya don't win races without pushing the envelope!;)


Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barP
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: texas
     
Mar 30, 2007 12:09 as a reply to  @ terryger's post |  #9

nah, that last pic is just a standard landing from a whip. if he can whip, he's used to having to pull out of it, and landing on the front wheel first is always best. he probably didn't even blink!

wp.


www.dapixa.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terryger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Mar 30, 2007 17:53 |  #10

barP wrote in post #2955784 (external link)
nah, that last pic is just a standard landing from a whip. if he can whip, he's used to having to pull out of it, and landing on the front wheel first is always best. he probably didn't even blink!

wp.

i'll take your word for it;) ;) ;)

sounds like you've done it and lord knows i never will


Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YFZ_52
Senior Member
Avatar
475 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
     
Mar 31, 2007 12:10 |  #11

Have any more shots from that day to share?


| flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terryger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Apr 02, 2007 11:23 as a reply to  @ YFZ_52's post |  #12

i dug out a few more from a different perspective. they could be cleaner and some could have been lighter but i am after subject/pose right now.
i also cropped because i had background that should have not been there. i originally put the back ground in as i thought it would be interesting but it became a distraction instead.

another quetsion? i shot these stopped down and got plenty of dof.

would it be better to blur the background completely or perhaps just slightly to give the impression of speed or leave it clear.

thanx for any help!

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirta.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirtb.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirtc.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirtd.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v96/terryg/dirt/dirte.jpg

Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barP
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: texas
     
Apr 02, 2007 12:34 as a reply to  @ terryger's post |  #13

i think 2 and 3 work well, but the background in the others detracts from the action. slowing the shutter and blurring the background helps, but it's not always an option. i think (and don't mistake me for an expert!) that the best defense is positioning. check your line of sight to see how the background will affect your composition. also, getting closer helps. that way you get a tighter crop without having to enlarge.

wp.


www.dapixa.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terryger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: butte sink, california
     
Apr 02, 2007 14:22 |  #14

barP wrote in post #2972098 (external link)
i think 2 and 3 work well, but the background in the others detracts from the action. slowing the shutter and blurring the background helps, but it's not always an option. i think (and don't mistake me for an expert!) that the best defense is positioning. check your line of sight to see how the background will affect your composition. also, getting closer helps. that way you get a tighter crop without having to enlarge.

wp.

i think i understand your comment but no sure .i can close in with one of my bigger lenses but as a sepctator, rather than a rider , i would have nothing but the same shot of a guy sitting on a dirt bike.

2 and 3 are what i consider good action showing speed but that shot is pretty much the same to every other one in that curve. the only variety would consist of a dirt spray, 1 wheel off or 2 wheels off.

okay for one shot but hardlty showing the reason i would want to watch moto x.

am i missing soemthing here?

i have no problem turning the background to just color by opening the aperture while still keeping the bike and rider sharp. would this be something to try?

thanx for thre feedback


Started with nothing and still have most of it!;)
www.spitfirephoto.com/​digitalmagic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MX_Ant
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
     
Apr 04, 2007 20:19 |  #15

Good start :). The shots where the rider is small must be thoughtully composed or there will be a loss of impact -even when the rider may be doing something dramatic. As a place to start with, keep the action tight and use a small depth of field to blur the background out. Also make sure you keep the shutter speed high enough to ensure the shots are sharp but don't be scared to slow it down to experiment with speed blur and wheel motion. Spend a lot of time crouched down in corners as thats where you can get some action shots (the lower angle will lend impact). Check out the work of top MX professional photographers like Simon Cudby (www.cudbyphoto.com (external link)) or Geoff Meyer (www.mxlarge.com (external link)) to see what you like and figure out how they got it.


EOS 20D w/Battery grip
Sigma 70-200 2.8 APO HSM, Sigma 18-50 2.8 EX DC
Sigma 1.4x EX DG Teleconverter
Canon 580EX
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lyonphotography​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,823 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
motox first attemps
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Motorsports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1789 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.