Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 26 Mar 2007 (Monday) 21:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Pissed off at CANON!(no built in remote flash trigger)

 
grinchy
Senior Member
Avatar
942 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Central Florida
     
Mar 26, 2007 21:52 |  #1

I was at a camera club meeting tonight (I know might sound stupid):D ...but I am still in the learning stages of DSLR...anyways I noticed a bunch of people tonight that were using Nikons were able to take off their hotshoe flash and handhold it or put it on a table and it was synched up with the onboard flash. Apparently Canon has not opted to do this and instead want you to buy ANOTHER flash or wireless transmitter to make this work:evil: . It is either genius by canon for doing this and making us spend more money on their products or very ancient in their flash technology...which is it?:confused:


Body:
40D
Lenses:
Canon 50mm f/1.4
Canon 85mm f/1.8
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4
Misc:
580EX..Better Beamer..4 & 8gb Ridata 150X CF..Opteka Battery Grips..Kenko 1.4 TC..UV Filters..Lowepro Slingshot..Tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Mar 26, 2007 21:59 |  #2

One of the BIGGEST missing features of Canon DSLR's.


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fensterbme
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Columbus OH
     
Mar 26, 2007 22:01 |  #3

Yeah no iff's and's or but's about it... The Nikon flash system is nicer and more full-featured than Canon's, deal with it...

I own the Canon transmitter (ST-E2) and a few 580EX's and it works okay, not amazing... I'd perfer Pocket Wizard based system. I guess when I want real lighting I go for monolights and pack and head systems. The Strobist stuff is nice, cool and good to have up your sleeve but me likes the big lights best.

I could complain about the Canon system but what good does it do? Nobody from Canon is going to listen to me or read this forum so I'm not going to waste my time, it is what it is...


My Gear: Doesn't Matter, but I have more than my fair share of it.
My Web Site:
http://www.fenstermach​er-photo.com/ (external link)
My flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/fensterbme/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Mar 26, 2007 22:11 |  #4

grinchy wrote in post #2936196 (external link)
It is either genius by canon for doing this and making us spend more money on their products or very ancient in their flash technology...which is it?:confused:

I say making us spend more money.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
overclock
Goldmember
1,191 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
     
Mar 26, 2007 22:17 |  #5

And if Canon were to ever implement this it would be a copycat situation essentially admitting defeat and that a competitor's product is better. Not going to happen.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 26, 2007 22:17 |  #6

Is having off camera flash control built into the camera body fairly new for Nikon?

I think it's just a few years they've had that.. but I could be wrong. I hope it's recent and that Canon will follow there example soon.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whakojacko
Member
166 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: San Jose, CA/Pittsburgh, PA
     
Mar 26, 2007 22:35 |  #7

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2936350 (external link)
Is having off camera flash control built into the camera body fairly new for Nikon?

I think it's just a few years they've had that.. but I could be wrong. I hope it's recent and that Canon will follow there example soon.

yes, a quick google reveals that the wireless i-TTL is onhttp://www.kenrockwell​.com/nikon/d2h.htm (external link) D80, D200, D70, D70s, F6, D2X, D2H, so it appears to be relatively recent. Canon should do this too


40D, 400D, 35L, 70-200 F4L IS and junk. flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Mar 26, 2007 22:40 |  #8

I don't think it would be all that useful for me, but there are those who swear by Canon's wireless E-TTL system and such a feature would essentially eliminate the need for the ST-E2 (well, except for the AF assist light).

I guess if Canon integrated wireless master capability into the camera, then at least the built-in flash would be good for something. :rolleyes:

In the meantime, there are alternatives that aren't very expensive and sometimes more versatile. An old-fashioned automatic flash can be fired off-camera via PC cord, radio slave system, or digital slave attachment.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,105 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 456
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Mar 27, 2007 00:39 |  #9

I would just like manual control of the on board flash, so it can be fired with out the pre-flash.
If they can do it on most of the compact range they can definitely do it on the SLR range.



So long and thanks for all the flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wilvoeka
Senior Member
599 posts
Likes: 43
Joined Jan 2007
     
Mar 27, 2007 01:09 |  #10

The Canon system has a steap learning curve, but once you master it you will ba able to see how much more flexable it is than Nikons.

With the Nikon System if you change the Cameras exposure you must re set all your flashes.

Ie. If you want One flash to be 1 Stop over one set at 0 and the camera at -1 and you change the camera to 0 your flash will change to +1 and +2.

With the Canon system the Flash and Camera are independant of each other. So you can afjust the Flash esposure or Camera whenever you want and the other will maintain whatever setting you have set.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Mar 27, 2007 01:36 |  #11

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2936350 (external link)
Is having off camera flash control built into the camera body fairly new for Nikon?

I think it's just a few years they've had that.. but I could be wrong. I hope it's recent and that Canon will follow there example soon.

One big area where Canon has been slow, wide angles and flashes. At least there's a new 16-35 coming out, which hopefully improves what it was lacking. Now onto the flash!! I wonder if the new 580 will bring more of what they should have.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Mar 27, 2007 01:41 |  #12

Moppie wrote in post #2936937 (external link)
I would just like manual control of the on board flash, so it can be fired with out the pre-flash.

Is this true (that it uses a pre-flash)? I have been wondering for quite a while if the built-in flash used a pre-flash the way that the Speedlites in ETTL-II mode do. I have not been able to find anything in Canon's documentation about this.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Mar 27, 2007 01:55 |  #13

wilvoeka wrote in post #2936991 (external link)
The Canon system has a steap learning curve, but once you master it you will ba able to see how much more flexable it is than Nikons.

With the Nikon System if you change the Cameras exposure you must re set all your flashes.

Ie. If you want One flash to be 1 Stop over one set at 0 and the camera at -1 and you change the camera to 0 your flash will change to +1 and +2.

With the Canon system the Flash and Camera are independant of each other. So you can afjust the Flash esposure or Camera whenever you want and the other will maintain whatever setting you have set.

Yes but the n00bs want bells and whistles not ACTUAL benefits. An ST-E2 isn't a big purchase and it is far more robust than the built in Nikon system. :D

I own a relatively new Nikon flash. It's good for a remote pocket wizard mounted flash as it can calc (on screen) what output you beed from distance/iso/aperture etc. But it's clunky and can't even be used on a new (Nikon) DSLR. WTF?

The Nikon system is fun to play with and show Grandma the tricks. The Canon system takes a nice picture of Grandma. Yes, a little "blending" of features and benefits would make people happy but it's a big picture sorta thing.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,105 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 456
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Mar 27, 2007 02:06 |  #14

bill boehme wrote in post #2937092 (external link)
Is this true (that it uses a pre-flash)? I have been wondering for quite a while if the built-in flash used a pre-flash the way that the Speedlites in ETTL-II mode do. I have not been able to find anything in Canon's documentation about this.


The on board flash uses either ETTL or ETTL-II depending on the camera model, so yes there is a preflash.
The compacts also use some version or form of TTL flash exposure metering, although its no where near as advanced as the SLR ETTL versions, however, on the compacts with manual exposure control, there is also manual flash control.



So long and thanks for all the flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Mar 27, 2007 08:40 |  #15

Moppie wrote in post #2936937 (external link)
I would just like manual control of the on board flash, so it can be fired with out the pre-flash.
If they can do it on most of the compact range they can definitely do it on the SLR range.

What is on-board-flash??
:) ;0


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,022 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Pissed off at CANON!(no built in remote flash trigger)
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2374 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.