Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 26 Mar 2007 (Monday) 21:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Pissed off at CANON!(no built in remote flash trigger)

 
jamiewexler
Goldmember
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Grafton, MA
     
Mar 27, 2007 11:16 as a reply to  @ post 2937140 |  #16

The Nikon system is NOT a gimmick, and the freedom to use the pop-up to fire a remote Nikon flash is one of the best features of "the Nikon way". It makes for a very portable, very lightweight one to two light system.

Here ya go - some shots I took with a D80 pop-up firing a remote SB800:

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/StefaniShoot095a.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/KellyJohnP05.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/Paulette198a.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/17504.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/0780a.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/l_fe6d6021ef0466039861bda8cb2ce3d9.jpg

and here's a couple with the D80 pup-up firing two remote SB800's

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/StefaniShoot170a.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/jamiewexler/StefaniShoot087a.jpg


Extremely portable and lightweight. A real pleasure to use!

Having said all of that, you can do the same thing with a a Canon flash in the hotshoe firing another Canon flash remotely. It's just not as light a setup as the D80 + Sb800. I could fit the Nikon rig in my smallest camera bag and have a two light setup anywhere. With the Canon rig I have to pack my two 550ex's in addition to the body.

I would love for Canon to step up and put the technology into a body!

Massachusetts Wedding Photographer (external link)
My blog (external link)
my facebook (external link)
my gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 27, 2007 11:50 |  #17

Seems to me that for the difference in price you can buy an ST-E2. When I decided on Canon I decided on a system. The Nikon system is different in some ways, the same in others.

Buyer's remorse is easy to resolve - sell it.:lol:


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Mar 27, 2007 17:36 |  #18

The bad thing about the st-e2 is that it only has 2 groups and doesnt contribute to the exposure. With the newer nikons you can have more groups and have the pop up flash be used as fill if you chose to or turn it off compleatly. I agree with Jamie, it blows canons system away, more flexable, less combersome and less expensive.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 27, 2007 17:52 |  #19

cosworth wrote in post #2937140 (external link)
Yes but the n00bs want bells and whistles not ACTUAL benefits. An ST-E2 isn't a big purchase and it is far more robust than the built in Nikon system. :D

I'm not sure how an ST-E2 on top of a camera body can be more robust than a camera body...unless by "robust" you mean "feature-rich" rather than "durable."


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RuggerJoe
Senior Member
Avatar
899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Carbondale, IL, USA
     
Mar 28, 2007 17:58 |  #20

It's nice that Nikon can trigger other flashes from the on board flash, But from what I understand it is a little limited. You can't control ratios from the on board flash like you can with a 580ex or ST-E2, only with their equivelent of the 580ex.

I just don't understand why neither goes RF wireless (as opposed to IR/VL) to maintain E-TTL capability over longer distances. I would love to see a Pocket Wizard-like device that can maintain E-TTL.


Joe

Comments / critiques always welcome.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ruggerjoe/ (external link)
Canon 350D
EF-S 17-85 IS USM | EF 50 1.8 | EF 70-300 IS | 580EX | a couple of kit lenses
All of which are all better than my skills.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Mar 28, 2007 18:44 |  #21

RuggerJoe wrote in post #2946100 (external link)
It's nice that Nikon can trigger other flashes from the on board flash, But from what I understand it is a little limited. You can't control ratios from the on board flash like you can with a 580ex or ST-E2, only with their equivelent of the 580ex.

It depends on the body, the consumer bodys are limited but D200 and up have mutiple groups allowing ratios.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 28, 2007 18:46 |  #22

RuggerJoe wrote in post #2946100 (external link)
...
I just don't understand why neither goes RF wireless (as opposed to IR/VL) to maintain E-TTL capability over longer distances. I would love to see a Pocket Wizard-like device that can maintain E-TTL.

It would be nice but I can't afford pocket wizards now. If Canon made them I would have no hope ever ever affording them.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photojournalista
Senior Member
365 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 28, 2007 20:57 |  #23

Wow! after seeing jamiewexler's images, I'm now pissed off at Canon as well.


photojournalista.blogs​pot.com (external link)
Nice painting, got photos?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grinchy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
942 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Central Florida
     
Mar 28, 2007 21:49 |  #24

photojournalista wrote in post #2946908 (external link)
Wow! after seeing jamiewexler's images, I'm now pissed off at Canon as well.


see what I mean?...LOL:lol:


Body:
40D
Lenses:
Canon 50mm f/1.4
Canon 85mm f/1.8
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4
Misc:
580EX..Better Beamer..4 & 8gb Ridata 150X CF..Opteka Battery Grips..Kenko 1.4 TC..UV Filters..Lowepro Slingshot..Tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Mar 28, 2007 21:52 |  #25

cdifoto wrote in post #2940803 (external link)
I'm not sure how an ST-E2 on top of a camera body can be more robust than a camera body...unless by "robust" you mean "feature-rich" rather than "durable."

AF assist beam, elevated above lens obstruction, higher output power, ability to be extended off camera for oblique angles. Yeah, a little more than a little led on the body.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 28, 2007 22:02 |  #26

cosworth wrote in post #2947176 (external link)
AF assist beam, elevated above lens obstruction, higher output power, ability to be extended off camera for oblique angles. Yeah, a little more than a little led on the body.

Ah so you're thinking features. I'm thinking "if I drop it, there's only 50% chance it'll snap off, rather than 100% chance." :)


Either way I think both systems suck. I wanna set ratios by TALKING to it! :mad:

At least then someone[thing] would listen to me. :lol:


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Mar 28, 2007 22:03 |  #27

BAHAHAHA. So very true.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jamiewexler
Goldmember
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Grafton, MA
     
Mar 28, 2007 22:17 |  #28

RuggerJoe wrote in post #2946100 (external link)
It's nice that Nikon can trigger other flashes from the on board flash, But from what I understand it is a little limited. You can't control ratios from the on board flash like you can with a 580ex or ST-E2, only with their equivelent of the 580ex.

You can control three groups and 4 channels (just like Canon) from both the D80 or D200 body or the SB800 flash. As for ratios, Nikon gives you the ability to adjust the FEC for each group on the body/flash allowig you to set your own ratios (e.g. On camera -2 FEC, Group 2 +1 FEC)

photojournalista wrote in post #2946908 (external link)
Wow! after seeing jamiewexler's images, I'm now pissed off at Canon as well.

Ha ha - thanks photojournalista. If it makes you feel any better, I sold off all of the Nikon gear a couple of weeks ago because the Nikon files were no where near as nice as the files from my 5D...Now a Canon FF sensor and Digic III processor in a Nikon body - THAT would be a camera!


Massachusetts Wedding Photographer (external link)
My blog (external link)
my facebook (external link)
my gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2MuchMark
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 02, 2007 16:06 as a reply to  @ jamiewexler's post |  #29

Hello Everyone,

This is my first visit to this BBS - I am a complete photo newbie - forgive me if this question is stupid.

Please look at this picture:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.

I am using a Cannon D80 in manual mode at 1/125 shutter speed, using the built-in flash to trigger an external flash & parasol, situated just to the right and above the subject. ISO is 1000

It looks to me like the shutter and the external flash are out of sync. Am I right?

Sometimes the black deadzone appears, and sometimes it doesn't. It is as if my camera doesnt "see" the external flash, even though it does trigger every time.

Any help would be appreciated!

2MuchMark



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Apr 02, 2007 16:10 |  #30

The external flash is probably being fired by the ETTL pre-flash.

Not sure of the D80 has a FEL button... press FEL, let the flashes recharge and then try it.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,025 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Pissed off at CANON!(no built in remote flash trigger)
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1758 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.