Comments/Critique please...
ISO 1600 shot, so a little processing is done.
 | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
RaphaelEmond Senior Member  430 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Quebec, Canada More info | Mar 27, 2007 13:30 | #1 Comments/Critique please...
Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ABrownPhoto Goldmember  4,676 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2006 Location: SoCaL More info | Mar 27, 2007 13:37 | #2 I think it looks really good for 1600 on the XT! He still has one more move.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SezzySue Goldmember  1,388 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV (Born and Raised in Detroit, MI) More info | Mar 27, 2007 13:41 | #3 that does look good for 1600. i love his eyes Sarah www.seibertphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sugarman Senior Member  890 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Blanche, Tn. USA More info | Mar 27, 2007 14:07 | #4 SkWeEkiE wrote in post #2939583  I think it looks really good for 1600 on the XT! Nice shot! Nice eyes! I agree! Can't seem to find any noise on this shot. Great post processing. Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2007 14:19 | #5 Keep in mind that the original passed through a noise removal software and has Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bbc14f Senior Member  682 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Toronto/Koeln Germany/Bree Belgium More info | Thats terrific, ISO 1600 unreal! http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelalexander2008/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imanyabob Senior Member  552 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Currently in Bay Area, CA. More info | wow... I love it!! Call me Ima - it should be pronounced EEMA, not AYMA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop  More info | Mar 27, 2007 16:42 | #9 Very nice. You hit the exposure which keeps the noise down. The pose and composition are good as is the lighting. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jej826 Senior Member 733 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Waterbury Ct USA More info | Nice shot. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewbieXT Goldmember 1,564 posts Joined Mar 2006 More info | Mar 28, 2007 01:23 | #11 Raphael Emond wrote in post #2939770 Keep in mind that the original passed through a noise removal software and has been reduced in size. This remove virtually any noise in the end result. The orginial has the normal noise found on the XT at high ISO. It would be a noticable ina 8x10 print. But not agressively. And I don't mind noise. I prefer to have a good shot with a little noise than a lousy one  Last time I printed an 8x10 from 400 ISO film alleviated any complaints about noise from my XT.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 28, 2007 01:35 | #12 Thanks for all your kind comments. Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kato1 Goldmember 1,093 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2006 Location: England More info | Mar 28, 2007 05:20 | #13 What noise reduction software did you run it through? EOS 40D + BG-E2N, EOS 10D + BG-ED3,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 28, 2007 12:41 | #14 Imagenomic Noiseware Community Edition... Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1043 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
