hey hey hey,
You guys ever here of any way of shooting long exposure with the s3, any cable releases that work, some obscure function hidden in the bowls of the tiny bugga?
superjdf Hatchling 4 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Mar 27, 2007 21:53 | #1 hey hey hey,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
O_T Member 209 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Outside of London, Ontario More info | Mar 27, 2007 22:35 | #2 15 second max........no stock shutter release that I know of. forest fungi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustShootin' Senior Member 820 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: South Florida More info | No remote shutter release, but your self timer can be set to two seconds. This works well for those times when you use a slow shutter, and don't want to touch the camera to release the shutter, or during exposure. Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agaupt Member 93 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Ma More info | Do you mean the longest shutter speed, or not moving the camera when you press the shutter button on long exposures?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 28, 2007 08:54 | #5 No, I am talking long exposures, greater than 15 seconds. Usually you can do that with a shutter release cable, just hold it down for as long as you want or until the batteries run out. Or a setting, like in SLRs their is the bulb setting or T setting. I was just wondering if anybody knew of a way to rig up some kind of Manuel release. Or some setting that allows you to work with longer exposures.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustShootin' Senior Member 820 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: South Florida More info | Mar 28, 2007 09:16 | #6 superjdf wrote in post #2943671 No, I am talking long exposures, greater than 15 seconds. Usually you can do that with a shutter release cable, just hold it down for as long as you want or until the batteries run out. Or a setting, like in SLRs their is the bulb setting or T setting. I was just wondering if anybody knew of a way to rig up some kind of Manuel release. Or some setting that allows you to work with longer exposures. I think you have the wrong camera for all this. The S3 is a fine camera when used for what it was intended. But for what you want to do, you seriously need to consider an SLR camera. Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ThomasS. Member 189 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Canada's Capital More info | You can hold the shutter release down for as long as you want, but the shutter will only be open for as long as is set in the camera (up to 15 sec). This is what you get with digital cameras. There is no bulb setting on any point and shoot camera out there. For that you need an SLR. ...Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Again I know what you are all saying. And no you cannot hold down the shutter button on the S3 at all period, you hold it down and it will take the picture and then you can look at the picture for as long as you want as long as your holding the shutter button down.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ba15ck Senior Member 271 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Southern California More info | Mar 30, 2007 13:45 | #9 You are right--there is a 15 second maximum with this camera....BUT... you may want to look into image stacking--there are some programs out there using sophisticated algorithms that... well to keep it simple (cause I am not all the well versed in it) set up a tri-pod and lock your camera settings in and take multiple 15 sec exposures--in the stacking program you can create the exact same effect as longer exposures--3x15 sec=45sec. 10x15 sec=2 and a half minutes. I have experimented with this software, but only that--experimented--It works, and it doesn't just darken your pictures--it works--but you gotta take exact exposures--the program I used (can't remember the name) did have some exposure allignment features--but depending on your subject, it is best to take static-exact exposures--unless of course you want a trailing effect. Polarize This!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hundsmiachn Hatchling 5 posts Joined Mar 2002 More info | Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Keoeeit Member 161 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | Apr 08, 2007 13:14 | #11 Permanent banhundsmiachn wrote in post #2993769 Hi I' am also looking for a way around the 15s. @ba15ck: Your numbers aren't correct. If you want to compare exposure times you can't simply multiply the numbers. The right definition is: 1x10min shot is the same exposure as 10^2x1min = 100x1min shots !! Other example 1x3min shot is the same as 9x1min shots ..... The programs you need to add them is giotto and fitswork.... So you can make 100 pics in a row (automatically) with 15s thus you get one pic with an exp.time of 10x15s is 2,5min..... I'm not sure I follow your reasoning behind this. Why wouldn't you be able to get the same light intensity/contrast out of eight 15-second exposures as you would a single 2-minute exposure? It would only depend on the stacking software/algorithm you are using, no?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ThomasS. Member 189 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Canada's Capital More info | Can image stacking be done in PS CS2? Or would it be a plug in? ...Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteCaspian Goldmember 1,103 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON Canada More info | Apr 12, 2007 00:16 | #13 Another issue on the constraints of a compacts!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hundsmiachn Hatchling 5 posts Joined Mar 2002 More info | Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2108 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||