Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 Mar 2007 (Thursday) 00:12
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Matte vs. Glossy ?"
Matte
36
63.2%
Glossy
21
36.8%

57 voters, 57 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Matte or glossy

 
90blackcrx
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Mar 29, 2007 00:12 |  #1

As the topic says, feel free to write why


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Mar 29, 2007 00:14 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Pearl ;)

semigloss/luster/pearl is my preference, I've just not seen many good prints on glossy paper from ink jets, and matte is too dull for me. a Pearl gives you some sheen and tooth to it, has amazing archivalness, doens't show fingerprints as much, and still has vivi colors and decent sharpness


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
August ­ 15 ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
423 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Mar 29, 2007 00:26 |  #3

Well based on the two options, I would say Matte, but I also agree with coreypolis with the semigloss/luster/pearl​. Us Seattle Photogs know whats up :) :) Im going to try and make one of the meets if I can.


Oooooh they have the internet on computers now. - Homer Simpson
Cameras and Computers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Mar 29, 2007 00:34 |  #4

I like Matte myself :)


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Mar 29, 2007 00:47 |  #5

It really depends on what you are trying to get.
I would recommend glossy for landscape and other shots where you really want fine details to be very visible. Matte in my view makes a better general purpose print paper.

But I actually prefer matt/semi gloss paper.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Mar 29, 2007 01:00 |  #6

I love pearl.


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thuringer
Senior Member
Avatar
356 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Idaho
     
Mar 29, 2007 01:19 |  #7

When choosing a paper for an image there is more to than just Matte or Glossy; Also sliver halide or inject? Subject matter? Production cost? When you want to get down and dirty there are so many different options as well; how is the image going to be displayed? You gonna throw the image in a family photo album or is it going to be in scanned and then put in the local news paper? What medium was your image from digital film? Do you like Kodak’s chemicals or Fuji’s? Me if its going up on a wall with low lighting and a photo glass over the image eh glossy is all right but I would use a pearl or Simi-matte if it’s of a portrait. If were a landscape, I have no idea because I suck at them and never wanted to display one. I try to keep this in mind each image is unique and requires some thought as far as choice of paper, mattes beveled edge ect, I don’t think the job is done once the shutter release has been used on the camera but the whole “picture” must be looked at. That’s the kind of control I like, and need when I am trying to put my images on paper. Then I am always asking my self what is the final product?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 29, 2007 01:23 |  #8

Lustre. There was a big poll done perhaps 6 months ago, not sure if it was in wedding or raw forum.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Mar 29, 2007 01:41 |  #9

Ok I never heard of pearl


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Mar 29, 2007 11:20 |  #10

I love Pearl as well, but don't tell the wife!! :-)


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jun 02, 2007 13:00 as a reply to  @ kevin_c's post |  #11

So is there any places online that offer these options ?


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Jun 02, 2007 14:16 |  #12

Matte for landscapes. Any thing you can do to allow the print to be viewable from all areas of a room is what your after. Glossy will produce mutiple reflections at different viewpoints.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Jun 02, 2007 14:18 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

I voted matte, but lustre or pearl are really better options, IMO.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jun 02, 2007 14:21 as a reply to  @ liza's post |  #14

I like them all.
I see glossy photos i like them, i see matte photos i like them.
For landscape i prefer glossy or semiglossy, for portraits i prefer matte.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jun 02, 2007 16:23 |  #15

Just want an opinion, what would look good for this pic ?

http://i3.photobucket.​com …lackcrx/IMG_474​1unt-1.jpg (external link)


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,930 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Matte or glossy
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1721 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.