Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 30 Mar 2007 (Friday) 21:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

General Flash Questions: Flash Duration / Asymmetrical or Symmetrical

 
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 30, 2007 21:14 |  #1

Two part question...

After I started looking into more pack / head flash system. I found the notes on Flash Duration being an important factor. If is typical that you PAY more moeny for a system that has a shoter flash duration? I Found two systems that output the same power (1200 watt seconds) and the only difference I can see if the one that has faster flash duration cost more money. (Ive been looking at profoto and Hensel, and Elinchrom lighting systems and Ive noticed two of the same (power) on a lot of packs.

If this typical to see shorter the duration the more expencive the pack?


Next Question is why get an Asymmetrical over a Symmetrical pack?

Which one is typically more expencive? I assume Asymmetrical since it allows for different powers to be set for each light?




[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awad
Goldmember
Avatar
1,067 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
     
Mar 30, 2007 21:55 |  #2

this isnt an answer to your question at all, but i use normans a lot, and i still prefer my AB because i can just adjust a slider and not have to worry about switches and knobs.


http://www.redfieldpho​to.com (external link)
http://www.theredfield​blog.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 30, 2007 23:35 |  #3

I do not equate flash duration brevity with cost of unit. Your observation is more related to country of origin of the product, and the relative expense of items from that country!

Symmetrical vs. asymmetrical...if you plug two heads into one pack, the symmetrical makes the output power the same to each head, regardless of output power setting. So a 1000 w-s pack at full power into 2 heads is 500+500; at half power, 250+250, etc. The assymmetric pack allows each channel to be independently controlled, so that a 1000 w-s pack could run at 500+500, 500+250, 500+125, 250+250, 250+125, etc. If the assymmetric pack permitted two heads into a single channel, three heads could be (250+250)+500 or (250+250)+250 or (250+250+125), etc. It is much more flexible and able to shoot portraiture with two or more heads on one pack with independent output control!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Mar 31, 2007 02:29 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #4

Maybe the shorter duration flash allows for slightly faster shutter speed. Whether it is useful depends on what the maximum X-sync shutter speed is for your camera.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 31, 2007 08:03 |  #5

bill boehme wrote in post #2959504 (external link)
Maybe the shorter duration flash allows for slightly faster shutter speed. Whether it is useful depends on what the maximum X-sync shutter speed is for your camera.

The max shutter speed is governed by the fastest that the shutter blades are fully open at the time that the flash goes off! If your shutter is fully open for 1/200 or 1/250, and if you have a veeerrrry sloooowww studio flash, the flash unit would have to have a flash duration of longer (e.g. 1/100) in order for it to be cut off by the closing shutter. The slowest studio units might actually have 1/400 as the Full Power flash duration, but no focal plane shutter cameras have shutters that are fully open at faster speeds! However, with the leaf shutters found on view cameras (or medium format HasselBlad and Bronica and Rollei), leaf shutters can synch at the fastest speeds so cutoff could indeed occur.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Mar 31, 2007 10:57 |  #6

Wilt wrote in post #2960122 (external link)
The max shutter speed is governed by the fastest that the shutter blades are fully open at the time that the flash goes off! .........

It is a little more complicated than that. I did mention X-sync shutter speed in my post. That is the length of time that both curtains are fully open plus the flash duration time plus a worst-case toerance to allow for manufacturing tolerances in timing for both the flash duration and for variation in the curtain timing.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 31, 2007 11:02 |  #7

Bill, what you just wrote I do not dispute. I was merely trying to point out that max shutter speed is not duration of the flash dependent unless the flash output duration is slower than the shutter speed, which is not likely for most focal plane shutter cameras.

a different factor is also the rise time to peak light output, and if the flash is slow on the rise time, that can affect things as well...like the flashbulbs of old caused the need for M synch.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Mar 31, 2007 12:20 |  #8

bill boehme wrote in post #2959504 (external link)
Maybe the shorter duration flash allows for slightly faster shutter speed. Whether it is useful depends on what the maximum X-sync shutter speed is for your camera.

I understand where you are coming with this from but a longer flash duration doesn't limit you to a slower shutter speed. Whatever the max shutter speed is on the camera is still usable. The only difference is that part of the light from the strobe is wasted because it isn't used to light the image so it's effective power is decreased.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Mar 31, 2007 12:39 |  #9

PacAce wrote in post #2961053 (external link)
I understand where you are coming with this from but a longer flash duration doesn't limit you to a slower shutter speed.......

I did not mean to imply that. My actual thought had to do with short flash duration and its effect on speeds above X-sync where both curtains are in the field of regard (in front of the sensor) at the same time and getting the full benefit of all of the flash energy. I did not mean to create chaos. But, maybe my thought pattern was not in "sync".


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,574 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
General Flash Questions: Flash Duration / Asymmetrical or Symmetrical
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2370 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.