Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 12 Apr 2004 (Monday) 20:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Model Shoot #2

 
shafiq
Member
158 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Apr 12, 2004 20:18 |  #1

Comments on style/technique/compos​ition would be appreciated.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Regards
Shafiq



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Apr 12, 2004 22:53 |  #2

I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
G3
Senior Member
593 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2004
     
Apr 13, 2004 00:52 |  #3

shafiq,

Please don't take any of my comments personally or as negative. I'm only trying to give you some constructive criticism.

As a photojournalistic type shot, this is OK.

As a portrait, it just doesn't work for me. For one thing, I find the backround distracting. It is bisected almost down the middle by starkly contrasting tones, white on the right half and reddish brick on the left. A more uniform background would help immensely, preferably the reddish brick. Another problem (for me) is the completely sideways pose. This would have been better if you had moved around a little to your left and had her turn just a little to her right so the pose was just a little more frontal, and that way you wouldn't have ended up dividing her arm right down the center and cutting off her elbow. The model is attractive, good choice there.

These are only my opinions...and are largely a matter of personal taste. If it helps you in any way, good...but like I said, please don't take it as negative.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shafiq
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
158 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Apr 13, 2004 05:14 |  #4

Radtech1 wrote:
I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.


Sorry for the small image. This is the largest size usefilm.com allows. I still have not figured out how to post directly here in the forum.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Idoc
Senior Member
295 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Apr 13, 2004 09:55 |  #5

shafiq wrote:
Radtech1 wrote:
I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.


Sorry for the small image. This is the largest size usefilm.com allows. I still have not figured out how to post directly here in the forum.

Do you mean you don't know how to use the image tags? Easy as pie :)

[IMG]
your images url
you can get this info by right clicking on the image in your gallery and it will show you the exact url it is located at.

Is this what you meant? ?


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shafiq
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
158 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Apr 13, 2004 20:14 |  #6

Idoc wrote:
shafiq wrote:
Radtech1 wrote:
I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.


Sorry for the small image. This is the largest size usefilm.com allows. I still have not figured out how to post directly here in the forum.

Do you mean you don't know how to use the image tags? Easy as pie :)

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

you can get this info by right clicking on the image in your gallery and it will show you the exact url it is located at.

Thanks for pointing the correct way of posting the picture.


Is this what you meant? ?


IMAGE NOT FOUND
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Apr 13, 2004 20:22 |  #7

Now that I see it larger, I like it even better. I know that the sideways pose is, well, less formal than traditional portrait photgraphy. In this case I think that it really enhances the playfulness of the shot in general.

The background is still unfortunate, but I do not see it as a fatal flaw. It is not like you have a tree growing out of her head! We already know that this is not a *formal* portrait. I am willing to let it be a little less than perfect as the woman and her pose/expression is what I am looking at anyway.

Nice

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shafiq
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
158 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Apr 13, 2004 20:28 |  #8

Radtech1 wrote:
Now that I see it larger, I like it even better. I know that the sideways pose is, well, less formal than traditional portrait photgraphy. In this case I think that it really enhances the playfulness of the shot in general.

The background is still unfortunate, but I do not see it as a fatal flaw. It is not like you have a tree growing out of her head! We already know that this is not a *formal* portrait. I am willing to let it be a little less than perfect as the woman and her pose/expression is what I am looking at anyway.

Nice

Rad

Thanks for your comments.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,837 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Model Shoot #2
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1738 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.