Comments on style/technique/composition would be appreciated.
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
Regards
Shafiq
shafiq Member 158 posts Joined Jun 2003 More info | Apr 12, 2004 20:18 | #1 Comments on style/technique/composition would be appreciated.
Regards Shafiq
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper 6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | Apr 12, 2004 22:53 | #2 I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
G3 Senior Member 593 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2004 More info | Apr 13, 2004 00:52 | #3 shafiq,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2004 05:14 | #4 Radtech1 wrote: I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Idoc Senior Member 295 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Apr 13, 2004 09:55 | #5 shafiq wrote: Radtech1 wrote: I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.
Do you mean you don't know how to use the image tags? Easy as pie [IMG] your images url you can get this info by right clicking on the image in your gallery and it will show you the exact url it is located at. Is this what you meant?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2004 20:14 | #6 Idoc wrote: shafiq wrote: Radtech1 wrote: I like it, at least, as far as I can tell. It is a very small image. The pose is lovely, the expression, though not toothy, it appealing. The background nither adds nor detracts. Nice work.
Do you mean you don't know how to use the image tags? Easy as pie IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] you can get this info by right clicking on the image in your gallery and it will show you the exact url it is located at. Thanks for pointing the correct way of posting the picture. Is this what you meant?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper 6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | Apr 13, 2004 20:22 | #7 Now that I see it larger, I like it even better. I know that the sideways pose is, well, less formal than traditional portrait photgraphy. In this case I think that it really enhances the playfulness of the shot in general. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2004 20:28 | #8 Radtech1 wrote: Now that I see it larger, I like it even better. I know that the sideways pose is, well, less formal than traditional portrait photgraphy. In this case I think that it really enhances the playfulness of the shot in general. The background is still unfortunate, but I do not see it as a fatal flaw. It is not like you have a tree growing out of her head! We already know that this is not a *formal* portrait. I am willing to let it be a little less than perfect as the woman and her pose/expression is what I am looking at anyway. Nice Rad Thanks for your comments.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1738 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||