Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 01 Apr 2007 (Sunday) 20:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Too sharp???

 
Psychic1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,077 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Nov 2006
Location: New York
     
Apr 01, 2007 20:20 |  #1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Please advise, did I sharpen too much?

1DsIII - 1D IV - 5DS R - IR Rebel -TS-E17L - 14L II - 35L - 135L - 400L 5.6 - 50 Compact Macro - Sigma 60 - 600 - 2 x 580EX II & CP-E3 - 270EX II - 1.4xII - 25mm Ext. - Angle Finder C - Induro/Induro - SkimmerPod II - Toshiba I7 - NEC Spectraview - Pro 9000 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buddy4344
OM System Ambassador
Avatar
1,693 posts
Gallery: 412 photos
Best ofs: 14
Likes: 2174
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Allentown, PA
     
Apr 01, 2007 20:23 |  #2

No, looks fine on my monitor - sharpness wise. It does have a bit of a wahed out cast thought - it looks like you brightened or lowered contrast to pick up black detail like around the male's eye.


Buddy4344

OM System Ambassador, Gear: Olympus OM-1 and EM1X, Olympus/Zuiko Lenses: 150-400mm f/4.5, 40-150mm f/2.8, 12-40 f/2.8, Oly 2x and 1.4x TCon, Kiboko 30L and 22L+

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Apr 01, 2007 21:32 |  #3

Sharpness is so dependent upon the size (resolution) of the virtual image. Remember, we are looking at an 800 x 533 pixel image - not even up to the resolution of my little Nikon Coolpix 775 with its 2 megapixels.

In order to make a critical evaluation of your image, one needs either the original image (before sizing it for posting here) or a suitable fragment of the image in the form of a full detail, 100% crop.

See my tutorial on making Full Detail 100% Crop, somewhere in this thread:
https://photography-on-the.net …thread.php?t=34​606&page=2


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Apr 02, 2007 10:40 |  #4

I can't see the image. But regardless, I'm going to try disagreeing with Bob, for probably the first time ever...

I think sharpening is all about the target image size. If you're going to post the image on a web site at (say) 800x533 or 900x600 or 1200x800, then you resize it to those dimensions and then sharpen as appropriate. If you're going to print it large, you keep it at the original dimensions (say around 3600x2400 if you have an 8Mp camera) and sharpen as appropriate. If you want to do both, then you create two versions and sharpen each separately.

So Bob's comment about needing to see a 100% crop is only relevant if you're intending to make a large print - and then we should be judging whether the 3600x2400 version is sharp, not the 800x533 version.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Attic
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,371 posts
Likes: 101
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Rural Hampshire
     
Apr 02, 2007 12:02 |  #5

Sharpness likes fine to me but would say check levels and tweak with curves to make it pop.


Alby

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Psychic1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,077 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Nov 2006
Location: New York
     
Apr 02, 2007 12:10 |  #6

Thank you all,
I'll try to post a tuned-up version later.
It's not easy when you are color blind, I try not to do too much.


1DsIII - 1D IV - 5DS R - IR Rebel -TS-E17L - 14L II - 35L - 135L - 400L 5.6 - 50 Compact Macro - Sigma 60 - 600 - 2 x 580EX II & CP-E3 - 270EX II - 1.4xII - 25mm Ext. - Angle Finder C - Induro/Induro - SkimmerPod II - Toshiba I7 - NEC Spectraview - Pro 9000 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Apr 02, 2007 15:30 |  #7

I can see it now. I think the sharpness is OK, though it's all a bit moot when the bird on the left is OOF.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Psychic1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,077 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Nov 2006
Location: New York
     
Apr 02, 2007 16:41 |  #8

StewartR wrote in post #2973100 (external link)
I can see it now. I think the sharpness is OK, though it's all a bit moot when the bird on the left is OOF.

The male poses but the female never listens to me, just like my wife :confused:


1DsIII - 1D IV - 5DS R - IR Rebel -TS-E17L - 14L II - 35L - 135L - 400L 5.6 - 50 Compact Macro - Sigma 60 - 600 - 2 x 580EX II & CP-E3 - 270EX II - 1.4xII - 25mm Ext. - Angle Finder C - Induro/Induro - SkimmerPod II - Toshiba I7 - NEC Spectraview - Pro 9000 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1960
Senior Member
689 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Hartwell, Georgia
     
Apr 03, 2007 04:29 |  #9

I agree with StewartR - sharpness is good to me but the bird on the left is oof.


T. Gray:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,684 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Too sharp???
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1606 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.