I know a few of the Already 1D'ers are looking at upgrading to the new Mark III, but for some of us wanting to take the leap into investing in a 1D the transition might be worth a little further investigtion.
I’ve been weighing up the pros/cons* (*not many) of moving to a 1D series body way before the release of the mark III.
I’m at a position where I can afford it, but find myself toying with a few other possibilities.
1D Mark III or 1D Mark II N + 5D (OR)
1D Mark III or 1D Mark II N + Hasseblad XPAN (love this camera)
I haven’t quite found an area in which I’d like to concentrate on so Wildlife and Landscape photography are my main interests. Whilst the Mark III has 10fps (great for Sports/Action) the 8.5FPS that the 1D Mark IIN will me more than enough for a lot of people, the same can be said on the focus system, the Mark IIN with 45 point focus system vs. Mark III 45point + Cross point focus is negatable.
But here is the but “Dynamic Range” – will the 1D mark III offer better Dynamic Range (measurable) against the 5D and Mark IIN? (As more reviews appear I hope to get the answer)
From my point of view it looks as if the 1D mark III is a culmination of the 5D with its high ISO low noise capability and the Mark II N Focus/Speed.
So am I better off just buying the 1D Mark III or the 5D + Mark IIN?



